Thanks for your comments.Mods should check on this poster's IP. Seems very suspicious.
The phrasing of some of the questions are incredibly biased. If you really are doing your PHD you can basically throw away this survey as evidence.
For example:
I am concerned because Tesla keeps changing the rules for electric vehicle owners, such as the period of warranty.
(1) Strongly Disagree (2) Disagree (3) Somewhat disagree (4) Neutral (5) Somewhat agree (6) Agree (7) Strongly Agree
This question implies that as a matter of fact Tesla "keep changing the period of warranty" when in fact they do not.
There is a tone throughout the entire survey that risk of data theft, data leakage or any other mis-use of personal data is in fact higher with a Tesla than with another vehicle manufacturer. There is no basis for this. Why mention Tesla at all? Why not phrase the questions as
"Did Tesla's proven track record on security and privacy influence your decision in buying your vehicle?" Note that sentence would be biased too but just the other way around. If you are going to be biased in one direction, you have to have a balance the other way too so that your results aren't polluted with inherent negative bias.
We developed this question based on interviews conducted with Tesla owners and we checked this link: Tesla Cuts Down Warranty Period on Used Cars to Just One Year With No Explanation