felixculpas
Member
One could easily argue that the spirit of the EHVIP program was not bound to individuals or their level of income or anything really at the n=1 level. Public policy must rise above the lowest common denominators and often makes unpopular choices in the interest of the collective good - in this case, the environment...which we seem to be forgetting about. Traditionally we have entrusted governments to do these things however unfortunately we are now into an age of bad actors willing to take advantage of a mis-informed public and herd them to their own interests.
As has been stated numerous times, getting someone out of their over-sized luxury SUV and into a BEV has more impact (approximately TRIPLE) than getting someone out of their reasonably fuel efficient sedan.
Why incentivize people that can't afford to take the incentive in the first place? The EHVIP program worked. GreenON worked. Carbon pricing works. (and BTW is NOT merely a tax on citizens). To bring income levels into the argument is "popularizing" the issue and plays right into Ford's hands. It's no wonder he was elected. All hail Premier Ford!
As has been stated numerous times, getting someone out of their over-sized luxury SUV and into a BEV has more impact (approximately TRIPLE) than getting someone out of their reasonably fuel efficient sedan.
Why incentivize people that can't afford to take the incentive in the first place? The EHVIP program worked. GreenON worked. Carbon pricing works. (and BTW is NOT merely a tax on citizens). To bring income levels into the argument is "popularizing" the issue and plays right into Ford's hands. It's no wonder he was elected. All hail Premier Ford!