You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh not again! Neroden is correct: IF Telsa isn't distributing the GPL License itself and any code under it (and no one to date has reported seeing any such thing), THEN Tesla will lose their license to distribute the software according to the GPL, and THUS infringe on the copyrights of the copyright holders. HOWEVER Neroden has no rights to make this claim, being that he is not one of the copyright holders.One of the great strengths of open-source programming is the reliance on reuse of software. If the reused software is proprietary, this creates a grave problem when it comes to copyright enforcement.
Just because you claim copyright breach doesn't mean there has been one. No one is taking issue with Telsa for a very good reason: It has done nothing wrong!
Oh not again! Neroden is correct: IF Telsa isn't distributing the GPL License itself and any code under it (and no one to date has reported seeing any such thing), THEN Tesla will lose their license to distribute the software according to the GPL, and THUS infringe on the copyrights of the copyright holders. HOWEVER Neroden has no rights to make this claim, being that he is not one of the copyright holders.
Those who wish can make a donation to the Free Software Foundation or the Software Freedom Conservancy. Perhaps with more funding they can persuade more companies to comply.
Oh not again! Neroden is correct: IF Telsa isn't distributing the GPL License itself and any code under it (and no one to date has reported seeing any such thing), THEN Tesla will lose their license to distribute the software according to the GPL, and THUS infringe on the copyrights of the copyright holders.
they don't need to distribute the code if there hasn't been any changes to the source. all they need to do is make a clickable link somewhere to the license to satisfy the requirements (which can easily be pushed in a simple software upgrade). IF they make changes to the source, they must be made public (aka like publishing the changes to github). it's as simple as that.
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/COPYING3. You may copy and distribute the Program (or a work based on it,under Section 2) in object code or executable form under the terms of
Sections 1 and 2 above provided that you also do one of the following:
a) Accompany it with the complete corresponding machine-readable
source code, which must be distributed under the terms of Sections
1 and 2 above on a medium customarily used for software interchange; or,
b) Accompany it with a written offer, valid for at least three
years, to give any third party, for a charge no more than your
cost of physically performing source distribution, a complete
machine-readable copy of the corresponding source code, to be
distributed under the terms of Sections 1 and 2 above on a medium
customarily used for software interchange; or,
c) Accompany it with the information you received as to the offer
to distribute corresponding source code. (This alternative is
allowed only for noncommercial distribution and only if you
received the program in object code or executable form with such
an offer, in accord with Subsection b above.)
Not quite. According to the GPL even if they don't change the code they must still provide a copy of the GPL itself (from section 1), and according to Section 3:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/COPYING
So, while yes a link on their webpage to their upstream provider (Nvidia most likely) will should fulfill section 3c (assuming no changes from section 2), they still need to provide a copy of the GPL AND a this link, neither of which they seem to be doing.
Most likely no one. The terms of the GPL are a very low price to "pay" for use of an amazing suite of software. Just because no one is gonna sue you over it doesn't make it right to disregard the terms. It's an honor system, and honorable people and companies meet their obligations without needing someone to bring a law suit to make them.Who will sue for "breaching" that clause?
What does the Unix copyright mess have to do with Linux and the GPL? Have we learned nothing from the SCO days?The USL v. BSDi case had shown that the Unix copyrights are weak and unenforceable.
Have you read the Courts decisions on the issue of who owns Linux and alleged copyright violations?
Linux is free, as jury rules for Novell in SCO Unix copyright case
If it's free, can you really place copyright provisions, such as the ones you've put in your post above, on it? If so, how? Please support your position by reference to the law, not to what people or groups say you must do. Those are two very different things, as I trust you can appreciate.
Now, for the only bad thing so far.... One of my headlights went out last night, I'm 300 miles from service center... took a hour on the side of the road to convince a jackass cop that changing the headlight isnt a 5 minute project and that I need tools to pop out all the clips and what not to remove the liner in the wheel well to get at the bulb..... He let me off with a warning....so thats todays project in the rain.
Thankfully, I'm one of the few thousand that have the Halogens :-DFyi the xenon headlights are a completely sealed unit and impossible to repair or replace individual bulbs. A new headlight unit is required and it costs about $1500 each...it's something only Tesla can do (aka swap entire headlight unit, since they cannot repair either).
Fyi the xenon headlights are a completely sealed unit and impossible to repair or replace individual bulbs. A new headlight unit is required and it costs about $1500 each...it's something only Tesla can do (aka swap entire headlight unit, since they cannot repair either).
Wait a minute, you can't replace the Xenon bulb in the Model S headlight? That's crazy!
im happy that islandbay has mostly resolved his issue but....
yea, not being allowed to coordinate his own repairs, is def an issue, and will increasingly be more of an issue as more teslas are sold, and these rip off repair shops proliferate.
and my silly physical car key turns on my car100% of the time. 90% is...pretty bad.
and yes, signing an NDA comes off as real shady. not necessarily referring to you, but for any car manufacturer to do that (let alone tesla), for their own mistakes...yikes.
I believe Porsche does that too. NDA is standard fare so other people don't have unrealistic expectations when they make an exceptional deal. Tesla has enough complaining about unfairness as it is.and yes, signing an NDA comes off as real shady. not necessarily referring to you, but for any car manufacturer to do that (let alone tesla), for their own mistakes...yikes.