kizamybute'
Member
My 2016 X90D depreciated a bit over 40% in 3½ years, retaining almost 60% of its value. That's based on Tesla's trade-in credit for a new Long Range S. According to your math, was I better off buying than leasing?
Model X's have held their value better than the Model S. Aside from the AP1/AP2 change made shortly after the Model X was released, it hasn't really had any major hardware changes that have impacted its value.
I paid $120,000 for my Model S in 2015. Tesla offered me $61,000 when they were trying to get me to upgrade to a new one less than 2 years after a leased it. This was after AP2 was released and the front end changed. I can only imagine what it would be today being that the price of a new one declined over 15%. I could buy the same car today, new, which is a far superior car to my 2015, for $105,000 and have a bigger battery. As noted, they sold my exact car for just over $50,000 as a CPO, so the trade in offer certainly would have been notably less than that. Well over 60% in 3 years.
If they're really offering you 60% for your car after 3 1/2 years, considering the price reductions for the Model X too, I'd be all over that in 2 seconds flat. The new MS & MX are far superior to even a 2017 car. That's a hell of a deal and should take it, NOW! IF, big IF, they'll really give you that for it. Even for the more limited Model X, that's still a very high, almost unbelievable "TRADE IN" offer from Tesla. Don't know what you paid for your car, but there's a bunch of 2016 90D X's on their CPO website for in the $60,000+ range. So, 60%, is a hell of a deal for you if you can get that.
And the "90" battery was a bust, compared to the 85 battery. Offered no real world range improvement, yet they charged $3,000 for it. Mine was a 90 too, was no better than the 85 car I got rid of for it. Have the 100D battery and it's just a teeny bit better, by about 100 miles!!! LOL
Last edited: