golfski
Member
golfski, eclectric,
I hear you. What we know is Tesla was all setup to deliver the cars with the new sports seats as planned but then found a last minute problem with them and had to pull all the seats. That's on them and no doubt some heads need to roll, but the question is what would you have them do then? Hold all the cars for weeks, months even more until they have enough of the fixed seats in inventory to put all the cars out with them and make everyone wait?
I think they made the only sane choice given the circumstances, which is make some people wait for the seats and make no one wait for the car.
If that was important to you then you had the option to reorder and wait. You _still_ have the option to do that. Give the car back, reorder, and wait.
There is no magical third option where someone takes a time machine back and catches the seat design error two months ago and avoids the disaster. Likewise, Tesla has got to be getting the fixed seats in as fast as they can from their supplier. Remember, this is the same company that air freighted tires from Europe in December 2012 when Continental screwed up Tesla's order.
If you have any productive solutions to offer or specifics on how Tesla could have done better here other than "never had made the design mistake to begin with" I'm all ears. If I'm reading your statements correctly - that you'd rather have had Tesla made you wait for your car until the revised seats were in - then what's stopping you from doing that now?
Again, I'm seriously interested in seeing what happens when someone takes Tesla up on their happiness guarantee. Why aren't you?
Don't get me wrong, if I had a P85D on order and fell into that group of having to take old seats while still getting the car delivered in '14 (tax credit, wanting to drive it ASAP!) I would have definitely taken delivery. I just don't think we should be making excuses for the company and need to be calling them out on this stuff. The seat thing is certainly understandable - but to some its not acceptable and they have the option as you described to return it or refuse delivery. From a stock-holder standpoint though, think of all the money wasted (parts & labor) by having to deliver seats that will be trashed in a few months. To me the only real option is to refund all the money for NG seats and deliver with old seats. Then when the seats are ready - allow to upgrade to the NG seats at the same price it would have been offered new - and at that time pay for the seats. As it stands, they are booking revenue for 2014 for products they didn't actually deliver.
I have more of a problem with the range debacle and I think it highlights how the company is deceiving consumers (or not revealing all the information) for their own benefit. At the time before the "D" announcement there was already talk of Tesla missing their 2014 numbers by 3,000 units. When the "D" was announced, it was all about how it will be the most efficient variant - there were no qualifications on timing, etc. To me that smells of a company that knew it would be delivering a less-supperior car than promised by EOY 2014 but still wanted the surge of sales that the "D" would deliver to them (performance, AWD, X crowd) in 2014. I think they took advantage of an eager crowd who wanted the performance, AWD, new seats - and also only promising to deliver the most expensive variant of those new things in 2014, which no doubt made the impatient buyers "upgrade" to a P85D instead of an 85D. Given that range is one of the most important aspects about buying an electric car and the constant arguments over why everyone should skip the 60 and go to the 85 because it has the max range - do you think that the P85D would have been as widely accepted if buyers knew before they put deposits down and sold existing cars that the rated range would be between the 60 and 85, though $50,000 more than a 60?
So my suggestion to Tesla is to announce and deliver a product when its ready and meets the promises that they marketed it under. That seems pretty simple. Bugs in software or hardware is one thing - marketing something knowing you won't deliver it but still charging people for it is where I have a problem.