Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Papafox's Daily TSLA Trading Charts

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
Hey @Papafox - no post for Friday? I hope you're OK...
BZ, it's coming Sat PM or Sun AM at latest. I usually spend 4 hours studying the day before typing words and lassoing graphic images. Fortunately, Iceman the 50 state Tesla dog is by my side and giving me company as I sort through my day-job activities.
 
jun5chart.png

TSLA chart above

jun5nas2.png

QQQ chart above

Considering the lack of negative Tesla news and the solid strength of the macros on Friday, it's apparent that the volatility in TSLA's Friday trading was likely manipulations intended to keep the stock price below the 880 wall of expiring call options (see Thursday's open interest chart). Unfortunately for the hedge funds intent on a close below 880, by afternoon the macros remained so strong that the market took the manipulation discount being offered and ran with it. Going into the final 2 hours of market trading on Fridays, traders will often load up on TSLA with the hope of a strong Monday morning opening, particularly when it's evident the stock price is being held back artificially. When macros didn't blink, traders started buying.

As with most of this week, volume was low at 7.8M shares. Longs are still holding for S&P500 inclusion and things beyond. We saw three TSLA dips, the 10:30 bottom, the noon bottom and the 2pm bottom. In each case I suspect the manipulators were testing to see how much weakness might exist. My personal feeling is they pushed down too aggressively on the 2:00pm bottom, however, because once traders started buying the stock in preparation for Monday morning, the rise generated FOMO in other traders and the price shot well past 880. Look at an unsuccessful dip as a engraved invitation for a FOMO climb into close. If macros had instead dipped significantly at 2pm, the manipulators would have been in the catbird seat, but it didn't happen. In fact we did see NASDAQ slight retreat from 2:30pm onward, but by then the rise of TSLA from 875 to 885 was the story.

Taking a step back and referring to the tech chart (2 below), you can see that TSLA is still rising in "the manipulator's channel", which is allowing a 3% climb per week but constraining the enormous breakouts. Such a controlled rise allows for sellers of options to make money and takes the pressure off the stock so that it avoids a huge breakout.

Positive news continues to filter in:
* GF4 in Berlin is seeing progress with excavation and prep for foundations
* Troy bumped his Q2 delivery numbers up from 79K to 81K. He tends to gain optimism as the quarter progresses. Meanwhile, Rob Maurer, who nailed the Q1 production and delivery numbers, maintains his 88K delivery estimate
* 88K vehicles delivered might well be enough to achieve a $1 profit and enable S&P500 inclusion. Don't bet the farm, though. Working against inclusion would be lower FCA credits, due to lower European deliveries in Q2. Working in favor of inclusion would be a net gain in deliveries vs. production as Q1's surplus at end of quarter is sold in Q2.
* Hints of decent demand continue to come forward.


jun5short.png

Friday was the second day in a row of substantial increase in percent of selling by TSLA shorts from about 40ish in May to 59.5%. I suspect this rise in selling by shorts means they have really been working the stock on Thursday and Friday to achieve a close of less than 880 on Friday.

jun5tech.png

Even with TSLA's 20+ point gains on Friday, the stock price is still 9 below the upper-bb, which is a comfortable place for it to be going into Monday's opening. All bollinger bands keep rising.

For the week, TSLA closed at 885.66, up 50.66 from last Friday's 835.00. This is the 3rd week in a row of climbing, and TSLA has gained over 85 in the past 3 weeks, or more than $28/week. Not too bad. Have a great weekend.

Conditions:
* Dow up 829 (3.15%)
* NASDAQ up 198 (2.06%)
* TSLA 885.66, up 21.28 (2.46%)
* TSLA volume 7.8M shares
* Oil 39.55
* Percent of TSLA selling tagged to shorts: 59.5%
 
jun8chart.JPG

TSLA chart above
jun8nasdaily.png

NASDAQ daily chart above, market hours

TSLA at 950 anyone? Today we saw the 2nd Mighty Monday in a row, with TSLA rising more than 64 points to close just pennies below 950 (which is managed to bag minutes later). The market close of 949.92 marks a new All Time High closing price for the stock, so congratulations, longs! On Feb 4 TSLA ran all the way up to 968.98 in market trading before a manipulative push brought it down more than 50 points for its close that day.

The two runs into the 900s couldn't be more different. The February rally was an overheated sprint, driven by massive speculation in call options which necessitated that the market makers buy like crazy to delta-hedge. Today's run has been part of a 3% per week slow climb that I believe would have been quicker if not held back by certain parties who sold expiring options. Volume was also much higher on Feb. 4: over 60M shares, vs. today's 13.8M shares traded. What the two runs above 900 have in common is that they both required robust buying by market makers to delta-hedge. With today's small volume (no one really wanted to sell), the market makers had to keep buying once the run got started and thus we even saw a rise into after-hours trading.

Another difference between the two runs was that today's run above 900 appears sustainable. On Feb 2, TSLA closed at 650. In two trading sessions it was over 900. That's a squeeze-type of vertical trajectory that often leads to an equally exciting retreat. OTOH, we're hearing various financial gurus laying out why TSLA is now going to 1000, or 1200, or 1500, depending upon whose words you read. The differences between the Feb run and today's run are the difference between night and day.

Take a look at the tech chart below and you'll notice an important difference between last Monday's big run and this Monday's. Last Monday, TSLA was skimming low over the mid-bollinger band, running along the lower edges of the trading channel. Today's was different, however, because on Friday TSLA closed only 9 below the upper bollinger band, so that today's big run took it well above the upper-bb. It's possible that the combination of macros and manipulations will pull TSLA back into the manipulation channel, but another possibility with TSLA closing well above the previous ATH closing price is that this strong close signals a breakout and the traders may come in and start bidding the price up. It's going to be interesting to watch.

In news:
* This Reuters article says that Tesla delivered more than 11K Model 3s from GF3 in May. Many news outlets claim this story is the reason for today's run upwards in TSLA's stock price.
* This Bloomberg article says that GF3 Tesla M3s will be receiving million mile batteries from CATL
* This Electrec article says that the UK is considering offering 6K per vehicle for people switching to EVs
* Tesla bull Ron Baron is appearing on CNBC at 7:30am Tuesday morning (Eastern time). Over the years, various appearances of Tesla critics and bulls who have appeared on CNBC have sometimes moved the stock price.

jun8nas.png

NASDAQ 6 month chart showing coronadip and recovery

Where are the macros heading? One concern was that they would bounce when they hit the pre-coronavirus highs, but if you look at this chart of the NASDAQ, you can see that today the NAS has risen above these previous highs. Doesn't look like a bounce, so far. Hope for a vaccine as the country reopens is cited as a reason for this macro strength.

jun8short.png

TSLA shorts were tagged with 47.2% of TSLA selling today, suggesting they didn't want to stand in front of the steamroller

jun8tech.png

Check out the volume during the Feb 4 run above 900 and compare it to today's. The actual previous ATH close was on Feb 17, at the top of that run. Also notice that today's rally places TSLA more than 30 above the upper bollinger band. Is a breakout from the controlled trading of the past 3 weeks coming or will the various powers manage to pull TSLA back into the manipulation channel? Stay tuned.

Conditions:
* Dow up 461 (1.70%)
* NASDAQ up 111 (1.13%)
* TSLA 949.92, up 64.26 (7.27%)
* TSLA volume 13.8M shares
* Oil 38.18
* Percent of TSLA selling tagged to shorts: 47.2%
 
Last edited:
jun9chart.JPG

TSLA chart above
jun9qqq.JPG

QQQ chart above

Looks like this week is starting to shape up like last week. We see a big upward movement on Monday and then the option sellers spend the rest of the week trying to trim the gains back a little so that the popular call options expire out of the money. Last week 900-strike calls were a possibility but as the week progressed the battle lines focused on the 880 calls. This week, if you look at the maximum-pain chart below for expiring options this Friday, over 6,000 950-strike calls are in open interest and the sellers really don't want TSLA to close above 950. Even worse for them would be if TSLA gets frisky this week and closes above 1,000 because there are over 12,000 calls at that price point expiring.

Things don't always go as planned, however. There's a pattern of traders entering on Friday late afternoons to be positioned for a Mighty Monday, and so that positioning bid TSLA up to 885 going into Friday's close.

What we saw last week was trading in which TSLA typically started off positively but then descended as the day went on. I wouldn't be surprised to see a similar scenario this week.

Today, we saw a Mandatory Morning Dip that was not present in the QQQ chart and when QQQ started running well into the green we saw a game of whack-the-mole throughout most the day where short-selling was used to contain any effort of TSLA to stray too far into the green or linger there too long. Although QQQ showed a dip in the final 20 minutes, we saw an exaggerated dip with TSLA, which is a favorite manipulation. Also notice the distinct icicles throughout the day, another sure sign of manipulations.

What to do about it all? If you don't have hours to devote to playing with trading shares, HODL is your friend. TSLA is still very much in an upward trajectory. If you are trying some short-term trades, the best scenario so far has been positioning for the Mighty Monday, but buying before the crowd of traders starts bidding the SP up too hard. Also, you want to avoid buying the most popular strike price calls for that week's expiration. Expect plenty of effort to keep the SP below 950 on Friday, and if it gets away from the manipulators, they're going to throw everything they can to keep it below 1000 for Friday's expiration. Strike prices in between the big round numbers work so much better in this manipulative environment.

The exciting thing right now is the slight possibility of S&P500 inclusion following Q2's ER when combined with the tendency of TSLA shareholders to be in no mood to sell (as evidenced by low volume during these big run ups). I'm willing to ride out the volatility until we see that event happen. Heavy buying pressure plus few sellers = fast appreciation of the stock price.

In news, Ron Baron appeared on CNBC and spoke bullishly about both Tesla and SpaceX. He thinks Tesla has another 10X market cap appreciation to go in the next 10 years and SpaceX might do double that amount. This is the kind of upbeat news that can move the stock price, and I think part of the reason we saw the percentage of selling by TSLA shorts number rise today was an effort to counter the positivity that Baron put out regarding TSLA.

jun9maxpain.png

Notice the high number of 950 and 1000-strike calls expiring on Friday. Someone doesn't want you to make money on them if you're a buyer.


jun9short.png

TSLA shorts were tagged with 57.4% of TSLA selling today, up from Mighty Monday's steamroller climb

jun9tech.JPG

Looking at the tech chart, you can see that today's minor dip places TSLA only about $4 below the upper bollinger band, which should allow the SP to come back into the band on Wednesday. A lot of big institutional buyers don't like to pick up stock when it is above the upper-bb.

Conditions:
* Dow down 300 (1.09%)
* NASDAQ up 29 (0.29%)
* TSLA 940.67, down 9.25 (0.97%)
* TSLA volume 11.4M shares
* Oil 38.36
* Percent of TSLA selling tagged to shorts: 57.4%
 
Last edited:
jun10chart.JPG

TSLA chart above
jun10qqq.JPG

QQQ chart above

TSLA at 1025 anyone? Yesterday, this week looked like it would be a repeat of last week with sellers of options pushing down whenever possible to undo a bit of the Mighty Monday and protect expiring call options on Friday. Tuesday, the manipulators were clearly in control, with 57% of selling attributed to shorts as we saw icicle after icicle assaulting the TSLA stock price.

Today with "only" 18 million shares traded and a run up of $84, the market makers had a lot of buying to do to keep delta-hedged with such low volume, and so TSLA once again moved into that steamroller pattern where the delta-hedging just keeps the price increase going to end of day and then beyond.

Alas, these low volume short-selling sprees lose their effectiveness when a catalyst comes along to cause TSLA to start rising, and that's exactly what happened today when a leaked message from Elon to Tesla employees revealed a plan to move the semi-truck into volume production. Batteries and drive trains would be done at GF1 and the rest of production would go elsewhere. One of the intriguing bits of this plan is that most of us assume that the new more efficient battery cells would be needed to get semi into production and Elon clearly stated the semi's batteries would be coming from GF1. Are they that close? This is indeed exciting news. Much of the reason for Elon's decision is, of course, because Nikola Motors has been getting a lot of attention with its proposed hydrogen-powered semi-trucks lately, and I don't think Elon wants to give up market share by being late to the party.

Today was a great reminder that you often don't see the good days (and many of the bad) coming. Yesterday some FUDster was tweeting about China M3 output is way down as MY production is being built. Tesla VP Robin Ren had just left the company. Option sellers were on the warpath on Tuesday. We break 1000 because of a leaked Elon message. It happens, which is why I keep my money in TSLA and only play with small amounts.

In news:
* Wedbush raised its TSLA price target from 800 to 1000
* Tesla passes Toyota in market cap to become world's most valuable vehicle manufacturer

jun10short2.png

TSLA shorts were tagged with a robust 59.3% of selling today, bringing TSLA back up to the elevated April levels

jun10ihor.png

Notice that short interest remains fairly level during recent runs as losses by shorts exceed $13 billion this year, and the year is not even half over.

jun10tech.png

Looking at the tech chart, you can see that TSLA is no longer running in the "manipulator's channel" but has done a proper breakout. At the moment, the stock price is about 50 above the upper bollinger band, but the upper bb has turned so vertical in recent days that it's now quickly running after the stock price to catch up.

TSLA today took out the resistance points 969 and 1000 in very dramatic fashion. There's no known resistance points to hold it back now. OTOH, with 12K 1000-strike call options expiring on Friday, the option sellers have incentive to try for a pushdown to below 1000 by week's end. Never a dull moment.

Anyway, congratulations longs for breaking 1000 today and Tesla becoming the world's most valuable automobile manufacturer! We've been through the ringer together over the past few years and seeing the market starting to catch up to what we've already known about this company is rewarding. Believe me, you've earned your reward from this stock, and the party has a long, long way to go yet.

Conditions:
* Dow down 282 (1.04%)
* NASDAQ up 67 (0.67%)
* TSLA 1025.05, up 84.38 (8.97%)
* TSLA volume 18.2M shares
* Oil 38.95
* Percent of TSLA selling tagged to shorts: 59.3%
 
Last edited:
jun11chart.JPG

TSLA chart above
jun11qqq.JPG

QQQ chart above

Today's TSLA weakness was all about bad macros. The NASDAQ was down 5.27% and the Dow down 6.9%. Auto stocks were particularly hard hit and in a post from @Curt Renz we see: -10.01% FCAU, -9.99% F, and -7.83% GM. TSLA actually fell less than the NASDAQ today, which suggests we could have seen a climb today on neutral macros.

Although nobody was pleased with 1.5 million new unemployment cases, the biggest reason for the sick macros was market worries about resurgence of COVID19 cases. Is this such a noticeable spike? Some states such as Texas have seen rising cases and some response may become warranted in areas such as Houston, but overall the U.S. wasn't showing a large change in trends. I get my data from this worldometers web site, and here are two charts from today:

jun11newcases.png

Although the past 2 days have seen some rise, we see weekly variations of greater than this amount. Given the amount of gathering in close quarters for protests this past week, we could be seeing some event-driven rise, just as we'll likely see an upward bump after the July 4 weekend. Looking at the blue 7-day moving average, however, I see little reason to jump to conclusions right now, and I suggest the market overreacted because investors heard "spike" but they didn't actually examine the data.

jun11deaths.png

Meanwhile, if you look at the 7 day moving average you can see that deaths continue to drop in the U.S. from the coronavirus. Again, I see nothing in the past few days data to suggest the U.S. is losing control of the situation.

I continue to believe that there's more progress to be made in therapeutics, and we may see an eye-opening report this month. Fingers crossed. A better solution would be lab-created antibodies, and news stories point out that both Regeneron and Eli Lilly have started human trials this month. Unlike vaccines, antibody treatments work quickly enough so that they can be given to hospitalized individuals with the disease. We should learn in a short amount of time whether these treatments are effective at reducing the severity of COVID19. Moreover, tests are being done on people who could potentially develop the disease after exposure, so we'll see if there's a prophylactic property to the antibody treatments. They could be approved by this fall and could greatly diminish the death rate of the disease.

Finally, keep in mind that a vaccine could stop COVID 19 in its tracks and it might be possible to see hundreds of millions of doses of an effective vaccine available by year end. The U.S. government is throwing money at the problem and gearing up production of leading vaccines right now in the hopes that one of them pans out. What about the time-consuming Stage 3 trials which determine if the vaccine is actually effective? One way to greatly speed up Stage 3 trials would be with robust challenge trials, where young, healthy people who have been vaccinated are exposed to the virus and we get to see how successfully the vaccine protects them. An organization called 1 day sooner now has 28,000 volunteers worldwide willing to do just that. What about the ethics of intentionally giving the virus to a healthy person? One answer is that cutting 3 months off a vaccine's timeline could save over half a million lives, and so it might be unethical to stick with the slow ways the medical community tends to move. Another factor could be the availability of effective antibody treatments (described above) which could be given to any challenge trial participant who actually contracts the disease after the vaccine and experiences potentially serious symptoms. Let's keep track of progress in these alternatives for dealing with coronavirus as the market will respond favorably when positive progress is revealed. As for today's dip, such lumpiness during this crisis is to be expected.

jun11maxpain.png

Looking at the max pain chart, you can see that put and call options are almost even with each other at 1000-strike, which gives honest market makers little incentive to push the stock price below 1000. Moreover, looking to the left of 1000, you can see that puts dominate, which suggests a finish closer to 1000 would serve market-makers better this week than further decline.

jun11short.png

TSLA shorts were tagged with 57.5% of selling today, suggesting still a lot of shenanigans underway


jun11tech.JPG

Looking at the tech chart, today's dip has placed TSLA about 18 below the upper bollinger band, so the stock price has indeed made its way back inside the bands in less than 2 days. Such a relationship allows big institutional investors to buy more TSLA without violating one of their common behaviors.

Conditions:
* Dow down 1862 (6.90%)
* NASDAQ down 528 (5.27%)
* TSLA 972.84, down 52.21 (5.09%)
* TSLA volume 15.3M shares
* Oil 35.79
* Percent of TSLA selling tagged to shorts: 57.5%
 
Last edited:
jun12chart.JPG

TSLA chart above
jun12qqq.JPG

QQQ chart above

It's been a wild week. TSLA climbed over 148 when you add Monday's and Wednesday's gains, and it lost nearly 100 on Tuesday's, Thursday's and Friday's dips. This is a hold onto your hat kind of stock, but as long as you don't get bucked off it is going to continue bringing you rich rewards.

Friday's trading brought an immediate but short-lived dip into the red on opening, suggesting by this MMD that someone didn't want the stock climbing today. The stock immediately recovered into the green then just as quickly fell prey to an overall dip from the macros. @Artful Dodger pointed out in the main investors' thread that TSLA was moving up and down with the macros but with a noticeably higher multiple (2X) on the way down than on the way up (1.5X), a classic method of disguising downward pressure on a stock.

News which negatively affected TSLA on Friday was downgrades by both Goldman and Morgan Stanley. I find it perfectly in character for these investment banks to be running games for profit with TSLA. Goldman's downgrade came first, which was followed by an Adam Jonas downgrade Friday morning. Various theories are out there regarding why two big dogs downgraded on the same day, which also happened to be an options expiration Friday. One possibility is that Adam Jonas saw the dip of TSLA about to continue and didn't want people thinking this was a Goldman dip, due to the downgrade. So, Jonas could have cobbled together his own downgrade so that Friday's dip was a Goldman and Morgan-Stanley dip. Analysts like to have a reputation of being able to move the market, and the easiest way to do this is to get a quick downgrade out there when you see the stock is going to move downward anyway. It's kind of like the weatherman amending his forecast when he hears rain hitting the studio's window.

Whereas honest market makers would have been content with a close at 1000 (due to a balancing of put and call quantities at that strike price plus puts outnumbering calls at lower strike prices), we have seen that everyone is not always pulling in the same direction. Apparently some big-dog hedge funds decided there was money to be made with a strong TSLA push down on Thursday and Friday. Here's how it works:
* Wednesday ATH close at 1025, followed by macros falling off the cliff on Thursday, was a perfect setup for a manipulated low close on Friday.
* The incentive for such a manipulation is that it is highly profitable if successful, even if the manipulator is not presently shorting TSLA.
* The manipulators buy Friday puts (and we saw a TON of 1000-strike puts with Friday expiration) and short then cover throughout the day to sell high, buy low, and encourage the downward trajectory.
* Legitimate longs were predisposed to "trim" some shares once the new ATH had been reached, and this "trimming" worked to the advantage of the manipulators. Look at the tech chart below. In both the Feb 4 and Feb 17 highs, we saw the stock descend below 800 in 6 days or less. There's a tendency for the stock price to overshoot a natural top on these ATH runs without substantial news to back them up. For this reason, it makes sense for some investors (such as those using TSLA to supplement their incomes now) to trim a little off the top before that dip gets too exaggerated. The question is "where's the top?" Once the full day of TSLA's dip on Thursday came about, the local top had been defined. Granted, 1025 will look low in the future after a few more ATH runs, but for now it was an attractive price for trimming, which was encouraged by enough short-selling to see TSLA's dip become nearly as great as the NASDAQ's.
* Friday's trading reveals the age-old trick of selling to achieve a higher multiple vs the NASDAQ when TSLA is heading down vs. when it is heading up.

Take a look at the final half hour of trading. Both QQQ and TSLA showed recoveries (although TSLA led by about 5 minutes). I attribute the initial recover of TSLA to traders buying some shares for the hope of a Mighty Monday, which was then fed by the natural rise of TSLA when macros are recovering.

Overall, TSLA has the potential for a nice bump upwards when the details of battery day are revealed. Can't wait. News suggests that multiple breakthroughs in cell technologies are maturing simultaneously. I've just seen word about a possible collaboration between Novonix and Tesla. CATL has a million mile battery available now which Tesla is apparently going to be using though 2022 in China vehicles as it ramps up its own advanced cell and battery manufacturing. There could be some lumpiness as revealed technologies and changing technologies affect production and short-term demand (buyers waiting for the next great thing) but overall Tesla has managed such challenges pretty well in the past and may indeed do so again. In the long run, though, Teslas will become substantially more attractive to ICE vehicles in terms of pricing and longevity, which will lead to significant increases in demand at a time when costs are coming down.

jun12short.png

TSLA shorts were tagged with 55.8% of selling on Friday

jun12tech.png

Two days of price dipping have left TSLA 62 below the upper bollinger band of 997 and with some nice headroom to run uphill on Monday, macros and news permitting.

Next Friday will be triple-witching options expiration, which may lead to additional downward pressure by the manipulators. OTOH, the long-term story is very much intact for Tesla, and at some point investors will see a low and start buying to benefit from the discount. The announcement of a date for battery day may itself be the catalyst for a climb.

For the week, TSLA closed at 935.28, up 49.62 from last Friday's 885.66. In the previous 3 weeks, TSLA climbed more than 85. That's a gain of about 135 in 4 weeks or about 4% per week, on average. Not bad. Hoping you enjoyed your weekend.

Conditions:
* Dow up 477 (1.90%)
* NASDAQ up 96 (1.01%)
* TSLA 935.28, down 37.56 (3.86%)
* TSLA volume 16.8M shares
* Oil 36.26
* Percent of TSLA selling tagged to shorts: 55.8%
 
jun15chart.JPG

TSLA chart above
jun15qqq.JPG

QQQ chart above

Mighty Monday arrived again today, unexpectedly. Macros and TSLA were down in pre-market trading under more coronavirus worries after a night of worrisome futures. By 10am the macros were showing signs of shaking off their funk, however, and TSLA responded appropriately. It climbed into the green shortly after 10am and except for a few whack-the-mole sessions around 10:30am, it stayed there. QQQ, in contrast, didn't break into the green until afternoon.

Today's trading showed that rising macros, even if begun in the red, is a positive environment for TSLA trading. Someone didn't want TSLA climbing above 950 today, and between 11:30am and noon you can see the downward pressure on TSLA. The stock broke above 950 shortly after noon, and with the cap defeated, it was off to the races for TSLA. Although QQQ sagged from about 3:10pm until 3:40pm, TSLA shook off this negativity and resumed its climb after a short adjustment.

As I mentioned earlier, once this stock reaches a certain level of climb for the day, it often becomes unstoppable as the market makers are busy buying to keep up with the low volume but high rise of the stock. An overabundance of stock options being traded is a key component to this steam roller behavior. Thus, TSLA managed to climb more than 55 today and close in the 990s.

In news:
* Russ Mitchell of the LA Times did another hit piece, suggesting that because a neighborhood of Alameda County is experiencing an increase in COVID19 cases, Tesla may be hiding the cases being generated at its Fremont factory
* TMC's @EinSV , meanwhile, posted some truth about the COVID19 situation in Alameda County, quoting the county's health officer, Dr. Pan, regarding improving conditions and a reopening of more types of businesses in the county
* A Chinese vaccine manufacturer, Sinovac, reports it's moving into stage 3 testing of its COVID19 vaccine, after experience so far shows the vaccine is safe and produces neutralizing antibodies in 90% of subjects after 14 days
* Europe has arranged for 400 million doses of a COVID 19 vaccine developed by the University of Oxford. Including doses that will be going to the United States, over 2 billion doses are now planned. Large quantities should become available before year's end.
* Travis County, Texas, officials are meeting to discuss possible incentives to bring Tesla to the Austin area
* Tesla has been approved for an energy provider license in the UK, giving more evidence that battery day will be an eye-opener

Thought to consider: Tesla is looking particularly strong as a company once the coronavirus issues fade and new technologies are implemented. The COVID19 situation is looking promising after year end when a viable vaccine is likely to emerge. For both these reasons, I am making a point of keeping my leaps focused at least halfway into 2021 and preferably longer, in order to financially benefit from both these developments.

jun15short.png

Looks like someone tried to stop the steamroller by shorting today. Didn't work. TSLA shorts were tagged with 59% of TSLA selling.

jun15tech2.png

Looking at the tech chart, volatility has caused the upper bollinger band to rise above 1013 today, paving the way for big institutional investors to help propel the stock price above 1000. The main investor's thread drew comments about the "bullish engulfment" that allowed today's candle to fully encapsulate the previous two sessions' "real body" portions of candles. This is, of course, a bullish pattern.

Conditions:
* Dow up 158 (0.62%)
* NASDAQ up 137 (1.43%)
* TSLA 990.90, up 55.62 (5.95%)
* TSLA volume 15.7M shares
* Oil 36.82
* Percent of TSLA selling tagged to shorts: 59%
 
Last edited:
jun16chart.JPG

TSLA chart above
jun16qqq.JPG

QQQ chart above

So, TSLA was trading above 1010 in pre-market, macros were hot all day, and yet TSLA lost nearly 1% today. From that perspective, today's trading action made no sense at all. OTOH, there's enough evidence to suggest that Tesla's dip made plenty of sense if you just looked at other indicators. Please, step into my office, we need to chat.

TSLA is at a very volatile time. It's long-term prospects look remarkably good but there are short-term clouds on the horizon, especially the COVID19 worries. For this reason, it's important to realize that once TSLA gets started on one of its negative or positive patterns, that pattern is likely to continue through to the end of market trading. Let's dive into how a day gets earmarked as heading toward a positive vs. negative conclusion.

First off, consider that investors have been watching the Mighty Mondays and the manipulated other days for a while and once the hint of good vs. bad day for TSLA shows itself, investors are likely to either sit tight and don't buy when the stock price is on a descending trend or they see the TSLA steamroller starting to climb the hill and FOMO sets in as powerfully as adrenaline and encourages buying.

On Tuesday TSLA was set up for a difficult day because of the following reasons:
* The stock bounced off the upper-bollinger band during pre-market trading and began its descent. That negative slope to the stock price as we approached market trading open set us up for other negatives. One of those negatives is that too early a peak in the stock price encourages the vultures of Wall Street to jump in and manipulate the stock price down from there (and make money doing so, too).
* Pre-market trading not only led to a downward slope of the stock price heading into market open but also suggested a "double top" where TSLA approached its previous high and then bounced downward. In reality, that bounce can sometimes be a manipulated bounce and therefore less valid for technical trading if you understand market sentiment vs. appearance of market sentiment
* TSLA was high and descending at start of market trading. A good day is more likely to happen when the stock starts in the red for the day and then climbs steadily upwards through the green. Rising macros also support this positive trend. Sometimes a high stock price in pre-market trading leads to a positive day with climbing until close, but it's much harder to pull off a strong climb following a strong pre-market gain. If the stock price is still a discount (such as we often see Monday mornings after an end of week manipulation) then the climb after a strong opening has a chance of succeeding. When the strong pre-market gains lack support of solid news and the stock price is already close to ATH, then it's much more difficult for the stock to continue climbing throughout the day (and much easier to manipulate downward for a profit).
* The 1000 stock price worked against TSLA longs today because it's a beacon that invites trimming of shares by longs. Somewhat elevated volume at 14K suggests some longs did indeed trim some TSLA holdings today. It's a psychological price point that says, "I was patient and held until above 1000 and now I am taking my hard earned rewards". Such a sales price begets bragging (until TSLA is trading above 1200 and then 1000 doesn't look so high any more).
* Friday is triple-witching options expiration with LOTS of 1000-strike calls expiring. Thus there's additional incentive to manipulate this week to prevent situations such as the stock price closing above 1000 on Friday. There's a crazy amount of money on the line for options expirations this Friday and both buyers and sellers of those options have a stake in the most favorable outcome of this week's trading.
* The NASDAQ was descending as the day progressed. Macros still affect TSLA quite heavily most days.

jun16weekly.png


For all of the above reasons, once the downward trajectory of the stock price got established in pre-market trading, the manipulators gained a real edge which lasted throughout the trading day. Days like this happen. Rather than being bummed out by a weak trading day for TSLA when the macros are booming and TSLA manipulations are running rampant, I suggest looking at the week as a whole to determine how well TSLA is doing. We've just completed 4 consecutive positive weeks in a row, averaging 4% gains per week during that time (see weekly tech chart above). Seen from a weekly viewpoint, trading of TSLA has been going great.

Conditions:
* Dow up 527 (2.04%)
* NASDAQ up 170 (1.75%)
* TSLA 982.13, down 8.77 (0.89%)
* TSLA volume 14M shares
* Oil 37.49
* Percent of TSLA selling tagged to shorts: 57%
 
Last edited:
jun17chart.JPG

TSLA chart above
jun17qqq.JPG

QQQ chart above

It looked for a while like TSLA was going to do a repeat performance of last week: Mighty Monday, push down Tuesday, Wonderful Wednesday ... Unfortunately, the market caught a little coronafright from a resurgence in Bejing and increasing numbers in some states and macros fell this afternoon. TSLA descended with them. Notice the particularly large and organized descent of TSLA from about 1:25PM until about 2:25pm. In contrast, the QQQ dip didn't start until about 12:50pm and was noticeably shorter before a recovery.

I think we were seeing some significant manipulations on that initial TSLA dip because it was out of sync with the macro dip and we saw a tremendous amount of trading at 4:00 pm and then after-hours, nearly 650K shares trading hands (covering daily shorting, perhaps?). Notice how TSLA failed to climb above 1,000 on several occasions. Someone is working to keep TSLA below 1000 for Friday's close, I believe.

jun17maxpain.png

For Friday's close, here's the maximum-pain options chart. Notice that 1000 is the big focus point in calls this week while 950 is the heavy put strike. Thus, don't be surprised if TSLA closes somewhere between 950 and 1000 on Friday. OTOH, if macros hadn't gone weak Wednesday afternoon, TSLA may well have closed safely above 1000.


jun17maxp2.png

Here's the max pain options chart for next Friday, June 26. Notice that the emphasis of call options has shifted to 1100 and 1200 strikes. I suspect that TSLA will establish itself above 1000 if macros permit next week and the game becomes keeping TSLA from exceeding 1100 for that Friday.


jun17short.png

TSLA shorts were tagged with 56% of selling on Wednesday

Conditions:
* Dow down 170 (0.65%)
* NASDAQ up 15 (0.15%)
* TSLA 991.79, up 9.66 (0.98%)
* TSLA volume 9.9M shares
* Oil 37.54
* Percent of TSLA selling tagged to shorts: 56%
 
jun18chart.JPG

TSLA chart above
jun18qqq.JPG

QQQ chart above

Well, well, well, today was going to be the push down day that would allow Friday's close to take place below 1000 and allow the option sellers to reap some tasty rewards. Alas, analyst Phillip Houchois over at Jefferies threw a wrench into that plan when he upped his price target for TSLA from $650 to $1200, rated the stock a buy, and gushed over Tesla's dominance over an EV market that is expanding faster than anyone (except for us) expected.

With this positive news, TSLA rose to over 1018 shortly after market open, only to see the usual characters place downward pressure upon the stock all morning long. You saw the selling bursts that led to "icicles" and thereby gave away the manipulations. Looking at the QQQ chart, you can see that trading was docile when you realize that QQQ was only running up or down 50 cents.

At TSLA volume on Thursday was low as longs retain their conviction. Towards close, the stock price drifted up to close at nearly 1004, thereby handing the manipulators a defeat for the day. The full-court press of the manipulators is important because with continued good news such as the Jefferies upgrade, TSLA would normally run higher this week. The spring is tightening and if the usual suspects can hold TSLA near 1000 on Friday (certainly not a foregone conclusion any more) then you have a nice setup for a Mighty Monday on the other side of the weekend. For this reason I'll likely dip into my "sleep well" cash and pick up a leap on Friday.

jun18tech.png

Looking at the tech chart, you can see the upper bollinger band at least 43 above the stock price, which could really lead to a nice climb in the near future. Since TSLA closed above 1000 today, that number will not be an obstacle for tomorrow's trading.

Conditions:
* Dow down 40 (0.15%)
* NASDAQ up 32 (0.33%)
* TSLA 1003.96, up 12.17 (1.23%)
* TSLA volume 9.8M shares
* Oil 39.43
* Percent of TSLA selling tagged to shorts: 58%
 
Last edited:
jun19chart.JPG

TSLA chart above
jun19tqqq.JPG

QQQ chart above

The most interesting aspect of Friday's trading was how predictable the day turned out to be.
* Many of us were guessing the week would end with a price close to 1000, and so it was (only 90 cents off).
* TSLA showed tons of strength in pre-market trading (over 1019) but was then walked down by the usual methods
* When macros showed weakness at noon (Apple planning to close some Florida and Arizona stores, due to COVID19) manipulators used the event to somewhat exaggerate the TSLA dip and then cap the recovery
* In the final hour of trading, TSLA came under buying pressure from rising macros and traders loading up on shares, and manipulators once again capped the recovery (that took place with QQQ) and kept TSLA trading straight across to 1000 as if someone had laid down a ruler and was drawing a line
* The battle for 1000 was officially won by longs today. Looking at the max pain chart for next Friday, the call options action has already moved away from 1000 and is focusing on 1100 and 1200. On Wednesday, June 10, TSLA did it's steamroller routine and closed at 1025. Twice in the past week (Tuesday and Thursday), TSLA briefly flirted with 1020. I think 1020-1025 is the next battle, but it's entirely possible that TSLA blows right past it on Monday and then perhaps revisits 1025 later in the week.

In news,
* Troy upped his delivery estimates for the quarter (as he usually does) to 85,000. This is placing his estimates closer to Rob Maurer's (88,000) and giving TSLA a possible shot at profitability for the quarter (and S&P inclusion based upon a Q2 profit). Remember that Tesla only needs to show a $1 profit in Q2 to qualify for S&P500 inclusion.
* Tesla is delaying employee merit awards as a result of COVID19 pressure on the financials. This delay would help Q2 financial results be better than what you'd otherwise see, and it increases the chance of a GAAP profit in Q2.
* In this tweet, Elon said that the annual meeting would be delayed, due to no large meetings approved yet. Later in the tweet ladder, Elon was asked about battery day and suggested that the two might happen simultaeously. That might make sense, as there would likely be battery day questions at the annual meeting, and it would be best not to dilute the battery day material.

Analysts are expecting far fewer Teslas to be delivered in Q2, so 88,000 or thereabouts would be a huge upside surprise and the stock price would reflect it. Fingers crossed. As a general rule, retail investors understand TSLA better than the analysts, and so I'm more inclined to believe our retail guestimators rather than putting faith in Wall Street estimates.

jun19short.png

Shorts were tagged with 55% of TSLA selling on Friday

jun19tech2.png

Looking at the tech chart, the volatile ups and downs of the past couple weeks has widened the bollinger bands and leaves the upper bb about 57 above TSLA's closing price on Friday. Every bit of that headroom might be needed if Monday roars into a Mighty Monday. I moved forward with my plan of buying a June 2022 200-strike call on Friday (priced below 1000 and purchased before the final hour price runup as traders loaded up on shares for Monday morning's opening). I will sell an original June 2021 200-strike call at some point when it is more valuable than the call I bought today. I do most of my leap buying when near the bottom of a deep dip, and those original 200-strike Jun21s are now up more than 900%!

jun19techweek.png

TSLA weekly chart

For the week, TSLA closed at 1000.90, up 65.62 from last Friday's 935.28. That's about a 7% increase for the week and shows that this rally, with 5 consecutive weeks of climbing now, is accelerating. Including the previous 4 weeks, TSLA is up slightly more than 200 in the 5 week time span, or an average of $40/wk. Not too shabby. Have a great weekend!

Conditions:
* Dow down 209 (0.80%)
* NASDAQ up 3 (0.03%)
* TSLA 1000.90, down 3.06 (0.30%)
* TSLA volume 8.4M shares
* Oil 38.84
* Percent of TSLA selling tagged to shorts: 55%
 
Last edited:
Many thanks for all your hard work and detail in your analysis , and detail of your trades
I am trying to understand the logic of buying June 2022 $200 leaps , cost $800 approx vs buying shares
Is it the additional 25. % additional shares you can buy ?
Are there any other advantages ?
Many thanks

Good question. Normally, I wouldn't advocate someone buying 200-strike call options because you lose the ability to sell quickly if you saw something happening that you didn't like. You are also under a time constraint that's not there in owning shares. In my case 1) I originally got into 200-strike calls when they were selling for about $80 per share, and now they're over $800 per share, so it's been a great investment, 2) I trade from an IRA, so there's no tax consequences of selling one call and replacing it with a call with later expiration date, 3) there's so little time value to these calls that they're like owning shares over the long-run but at a 20% discount, 4) I believe I'll be able to roll them forward (a leap or two at a time) indefinitely at no expense because I've done so reliably in the past, 5) they allow me to own the desired number of shares and shares equivalents while maintaining my desired level of cash. At present, I want to keep my TSLA shares and leaps ownership high through S&P500 addition. After that bump, I'll be turning many of my 200-strike leaps into a smaller number of shares because 1) maintaining my wealth will rise in importance vs. growing my wealth and 2) shares are more flexible for sale should we see a dip coming.

I subscribe to the technique that worked well for @Chickenlittle , which was to buy leaps when the stock price is low in a dip and 2) convert those leaps to a smaller number of shares when the stock price is high. He did the conversions systematically, rather than trying to do them all at some high point (which is a much more reliable system). The idea is to maximize the return as the stock price rises and minimize the losses when the stock price inevitably takes a dip. It's all about using the volatility to advantage. The difference between this approach and timing the market is that if you are surprised by a run up when you are all in stock, you're riding that run up quite profitably with the shares, and when the inevitable dip happens, you are deleveraged somewhat for the ride down. The trick is having the discipline to convert to shares at some point. Normally, you should do so in stages, but I am too smitten with the S&P500 possibilities to do so at the moment. Here's hoping I deleverage to shares before the next dip comes. I'll be highly inspired to do that conversion after the S&P500 inclusion because I think we could see a 20% increase in TSLA stock price as a result of that inclusion.

Again, I wish to emphasize that I get into leaps when the stock price is low and near the bottom of a dip. The worst thing to do is to convert from shares to leaps when the stock price is high and then ride that greater exposure down. If you do it right, you'll have reduced leverage by 20% before the next dip begins and you'll increase leverage by 20% (selling shares to buy leaps) when the dip has bottomed out. Thus, when TSLA eventually recovers to pre-dip levels, the person owning shares would be neutral in gains but the person moving between leaps and shares would be up 20% over the same time period.
 
Last edited:
Good question. Normally, I wouldn't advocate someone buying 200-strike call options because you lose the ability to sell quickly if you saw something happening that you didn't like. You are also under a time constraint that's not there in owning shares. In my case 1) I originally got into 200-strike calls when they were selling for about $80 per share, and now they're over $800 per share, so it's been a great investment, 2) I trade from an IRA, so there's no tax consequences of selling one call and replacing it with a call with later expiration date, 3) there's so little time value to these calls that they're like owning shares over the long-run but at a 20% discount, 4) I believe I'll be able to roll them forward (a leap or two at a time) indefinitely at no expense because I've done so reliably in the past, 5) they allow me to own the desired number of shares and shares equivalents while maintaining my desired level of cash. At present, I want to keep my TSLA shares and leaps ownership high through S&P500 addition. After that bump, I'll be turning many of my 200-strike leaps into a smaller number of shares because 1) maintaining my wealth will rise in importance vs. growing my wealth and 2) shares are more flexible for sale should we see a dip coming.

I subscribe to the technique that worked well for @Chickenlittle , which was to buy leaps when the stock price is low in a dip and 2) convert those leaps to a smaller number of shares when the stock price is high. He did the conversions systematically, rather than trying to do them all at some high point (which is a much more reliable system). The idea is to maximize the return as the stock price rises and minimize the losses when the stock price inevitably takes a dip. It's all about using the volatility to advantage. The difference between this approach and timing the market is that if you are surprised by a run up when you are all in stock, you're riding that run up quite profitably with the shares, and when the inevitable dip happens, you are deleveraged somewhat for the ride down. The trick is having the discipline to convert to shares at some point. Normally, you should do so in stages, but I am too smitten with the S&P500 possibilities to do so at the moment. Here's hoping I deleverage to shares before the next dip comes. I'll be highly inspired to do that conversion after the S&P500 inclusion because I think we could see a 20% increase in TSLA stock price as a result of that inclusion.

Again, I wish to emphasize that I get into leaps when the stock price is low and near the bottom of a dip. The worst thing to do is to convert from shares to leaps when the stock price is high and then ride that greater exposure down. If you do it right, you'll have reduced leverage by 20% before the next dip begins and you'll increase leverage by 20% (selling shares to buy leaps) when the dip has bottomed out. Thus, when TSLA eventually recovers to pre-dip levels, the person owning shares would be neutral in gains but the person moving between leaps and shares would be up 20% over the same time period.

I wish there was a way to save post like this one to a "my favorite posts folder" because posts like this are gold. Thanks Papafox. I remember reading some where that owning options with 0.9 Delta or higher is essentially like owning the stock at a discount. Do you happen to have a liking to the thread by Chickenlittle? he limits who can see his profile. Thanks again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2virgule5
Papafox, many thanks for your valuable insights

This appears similar to what TrendTrader007 ( in May 20 when Tesla was $780 ) used as he has advised he was buying June 2022. $ 400
which has 50 % leverage , and a higher cost $ 450 , a $ 70 interest charge


A method that is very similar to buying stock , with double the leverage with a delta of .88
meaning that for every $1 the stock moves the option/ leap moves 88 cents

Thanks once again
 
Last edited:
@juanmedina - Those posts probably go back to 2014 or so. You're welcome to do a search of TMC to try and find them, but it would take effort.

@Robertj - I also own a bunch of 400 strike calls but they don't expire until 2022 and so I have time to just sit back and watch how things unfold. You can buy the Jun2022 200 strike calls with a time value of $14 for two years. That's $7/year for $200 or $3.50/yr for $100, which equates to a 3.5% loan. I don't plan to hold these calls until time value drops to zero and my fees for buying the calls might be quite a bit less. @TrendTrader007 generally has invested with more aggressive strategies than me. My approach is safer, I believe, but his will yield higher returns if all work out. More power to him. Keep in mind that TT007 has a really good job (physician) to fall back upon if he encounters tough sledding.
 
Last edited:
Papafox, many thanks for your valuable insights

This appears similar to what TrendTrader007 ( in May 20 when Tesla was $780 ) used as he has advised he was buying June 2022. $ 400
which has 50 % leverage , and a higher cost $ 450 , a $ 70 interest charge

Thanks once again

A method that is very similar to buying stock , with double the leverage
 
  • Like
Reactions: TrendTrader007