Have read a few threads on issues with PG&E main panel upgrades that are within the 3 foot rule but posting this anyway to see if a miracle occurs.
House built in 1978 (North Bay CA). Solar installer says city requires a new main panel for any new (major?) electrical work. Solar installer PG&E rep says that the main panel needs to move and will cost 10’s of thousands of dollars to re-trench (unground feed).
I’ve been told I have three options:
1) Cancel project
2) Go all electric (cap off gas)
3) Pay the 10’s of thousands of dollars to re-trench
I really do not want to go to option 2.
There are 7 houses in a two block radius from my house that have essentially the same panel/gas layout as mine. I know most of them have had solar installed 5+ years ago. Homes in our area seems to have the same panel/gas layout which apparently will make it nearly impossible for these homes to get solar. I picture an unlikely scenario where they all want to pay for the re-trenching and all the streets are “torn up” (harsh word for re-trenched) which seems would be a problem for the city.
I have read a like-for-like upgrade is very risky and not within the letter-of-the-law of the provision in the green book.
From,
Someone wanting to get solar but loosing hope.
House built in 1978 (North Bay CA). Solar installer says city requires a new main panel for any new (major?) electrical work. Solar installer PG&E rep says that the main panel needs to move and will cost 10’s of thousands of dollars to re-trench (unground feed).
I’ve been told I have three options:
1) Cancel project
2) Go all electric (cap off gas)
3) Pay the 10’s of thousands of dollars to re-trench
I really do not want to go to option 2.
There are 7 houses in a two block radius from my house that have essentially the same panel/gas layout as mine. I know most of them have had solar installed 5+ years ago. Homes in our area seems to have the same panel/gas layout which apparently will make it nearly impossible for these homes to get solar. I picture an unlikely scenario where they all want to pay for the re-trenching and all the streets are “torn up” (harsh word for re-trenched) which seems would be a problem for the city.
I have read a like-for-like upgrade is very risky and not within the letter-of-the-law of the provision in the green book.
From,
Someone wanting to get solar but loosing hope.