Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Poll: Are you in favor or against U.S. doing more in Ukraine?

Are you in favor or against U.S. doing more in Ukraine?


  • Total voters
    108
This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
Status
Not open for further replies.
...People in Russia are afraid to speak badly of Putin, even private conversations over phones and apps, because they believe Putin is listening.
It's a dictator regime so these facts are consistent with its nature.

Tesla is very obedient in China but very confrontational in the US. That's because China is also a dictator.

Saddam Hussein was also a dictator and the Kurds listened to President Bush, Senior to not be afraid and to oppose the dictator, the Kurds were slaughtered.

So being afraid can be a good asset for survival.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Terminator857
It's not about courage, it's about smart: Why get the hands dirty when there's a pawn to do that.

The lady in the CBC report said Donbass is a disposable pawn for both the West and the East.
It's not about getting dirty, it is about image, about not looking weak and perhaps even being feared. See the art of war: the best battle won is the one where you didn't have to fight. A quote from The Art of War
 
It's not about getting dirty, it is about image, about not looking weak and perhaps even being feared. See the art of war: the best battle won is the one where you didn't have to fight. A quote from The Art of War

As stated earlier, if there is integrity at all, NATO needs to protects Ukraine once it expressed its intention to join and when Russia demanded NATO to stop the expansion.

It didn't happen because NATO could still achieve its goal by using Ukraine as a disposable pawn.

The goal is to weaken Russia. When Russia is angry at the NATO expansion and goes to war, it's not NATO who is bruised. It's the pawn Ukraine who will get bruised and Russia who is weaken.
 
...thoughts?...

It looks like Poland does not want to be a sacrificial pawn to follow the US plan to first give its MiG-29 to Ukraine then the US would backfill with F-16. As mentioned above, the potential problem is: Ukraine pilots might have to:

1) take off
2) land
3) refuel/reload
4) and most importantly, do the maintenance

most likely at Poland airports.

It's true that Poland is under NATO's protection but why would it want to be a disposable pawn for the West and Russia to tear it apart?

That's why Poland is now shifting that bullseye to the US military airport in Germany by issuing the statement of transferring all its MiG-29 out of Poland to there.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Terminator857
...army...
Tesla has about 5,000 owners in Ukraine although Tesla has not started business there.

Tesla owners have had free Tesla Superchargers near Ukraine during the war (none has arrived in Ukraine but there are some in Poland, Hungary, and Slovakia).

Also, there's a 3 month paid leave for conscripted Tesla employees fighting in Ukraine:

 
  • Like
Reactions: DanCar
The war in Ukraine is a very difficult geopolitical problem, perhaps the most difficult one since the Cuban missile crisis.

If we get involved too much to help Ukraine, we risk a direct war with Russia which would basically mean WW3.
Helping wipe out Putin and the Oligarchs seems like a very good deed for the U.S. and NATO. But understand most don't want to take the risk to help our buddies in Ukraine. Most seem content to just supply arms to Ukraine. Can we supply advance arms to Ukraine? Our best drones? In addition to sending patriot missile system to Poland can we also send to Ukraine?
 
Helping wipe out Putin and the Oligarchs seems like a very good deed for the U.S. and NATO. But understand most don't want to take the risk to help our buddies in Ukraine.

I agree wiping out Putin and the oligarchs is a good goal for the US and NATO. It's just a question of how you do it without triggering a nuclear war. So yeah, it's very risky. Ideally, it would be great if it came from within, like a coup or popular uprising that ousted Putin and his cronies, just as long as Putin's replacement was not worst.

Most seem content to just supply arms to Ukraine. Can we supply advance arms to Ukraine? Our best drones?

Yeah, supplying arms to Ukraine seems like the natural way to help Ukraine defend itself militarily without directly engaging Russia. But Russia could argue that providing arms to Ukraine is siding with Russia's enemy, and therefore makes us a participant in the war. But where does Russia draw the line between "We don't like it but we'll it slide" and "That's too many arms, this means war!". That is why the US is ok with sending small arms like shoulder fired rockets but not ok with larger weapons like fighter jets.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DanCar
...drones?...
The US didn't want to sell drones to Turkey so Turkey made its own and sell it to the world with a cheap price of 1 to 2 million dollars each.

Ukraine has been resupplied with Turkey's drones.


The US would sell its drones to very few nations so it's unclear what's it's position on Ukraine.

 
  • Like
Reactions: DanCar
...the U.S. doing more than it is currently...

I didn't know about this movie until there was a big fuss about Youtube banning the 2016 movie "Ukraine on Fire" filmed by the famous director Oliver Stone. So, by hiding it, it creates the opposite effect!


You can watch it in some places such as:


It does give quite a coverage on how protecting the World-War-2 Ukraine Nazis in the old days and supporting current Ukraine Neo-Nazis by the US has brought us to where we are now.

More materials to read about the US role in supporting Ukraine's Neo-Nazis:



 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: DanCar
Status
Not open for further replies.