bonnie
I play a nice person on twitter.
Engineers building to specs and requirements becomes problematic when they ONLY build to specs and requirements. That's why it's important to have people with previous auto design experience.
It's necessary to instill the discipline to define requirements and the specifications to meet those requirements (you wouldn't build a house without house plans ... well you might, but you'd have a bit of a mess at the end ... 'hey everyone! just figure out where you think stuff will go and we'll work it out as we go!!'). But requirements and specs are often incomplete. Someone tried to argue with me about a product fix I was requiring by confidently stating that there was no requirement for my requested fix. My reply is now used frequently in other meetings ... 'well there is no requirement that it not smell like a dead fish either, but we both know that would also be unacceptable'.
Without that previous experience, we have engineers thinking they are improving on quality and sometimes it just has the opposite effect. Tightening the manufacturing process for headlights until they will predictably fail at an exact point, plus or minus 20 minutes, sounds good. But when you're on a dark road at night, and a headlight goes out, you rely on the other headlight NOT failing so you can get home. In that case, the perceived quality improvement actually puts someone in danger. So experience counts for a LOT in a variety of areas.
I have faith that the S will exceed our expectations ... and am looking forward to seeing the first one roll off the production line. The Roadster engineers have learned a lot & now we have people with auto design on board.
It's necessary to instill the discipline to define requirements and the specifications to meet those requirements (you wouldn't build a house without house plans ... well you might, but you'd have a bit of a mess at the end ... 'hey everyone! just figure out where you think stuff will go and we'll work it out as we go!!'). But requirements and specs are often incomplete. Someone tried to argue with me about a product fix I was requiring by confidently stating that there was no requirement for my requested fix. My reply is now used frequently in other meetings ... 'well there is no requirement that it not smell like a dead fish either, but we both know that would also be unacceptable'.
Without that previous experience, we have engineers thinking they are improving on quality and sometimes it just has the opposite effect. Tightening the manufacturing process for headlights until they will predictably fail at an exact point, plus or minus 20 minutes, sounds good. But when you're on a dark road at night, and a headlight goes out, you rely on the other headlight NOT failing so you can get home. In that case, the perceived quality improvement actually puts someone in danger. So experience counts for a LOT in a variety of areas.
I have faith that the S will exceed our expectations ... and am looking forward to seeing the first one roll off the production line. The Roadster engineers have learned a lot & now we have people with auto design on board.