wws
Active Member
In a different form of competition, on screen, abetterrouteplanner now has a Taycan setting for road trip time estimates. I compared a bunch of EVs for a Redondo Beach Pier to New York City 'cannonball' run. The time estimates for mostly default settings:
Model 3 LR RWD Aero (like mine): 6:11 charging, 43:09 driving, 2812 miles, 49:20 total time
Model S LR Raven: 7:24 charging, 43:08 driving, 2815 miles, 50:32 total time
Taycan Turbo w/HPC: 6:50 charging, 45:54 driving, 2905 miles, 52:44 total
The 90 mile mileage difference is due to different routing. ABRP routes Teslas on I-40/I-44 ("Route 66") across the Southwest, whereas Taycan must drive up to Utah, take I-70 across Colorado, and then I-80. When EA or some other charging outfit someday installs more CCS charging - specifically between Barstow and Flagstaff, and between Albuquerque and Amarillo, the Taycan will be able to use the shorter path.
So these times are fairly close. Taycans worse efficiency over Model S is largely made up for by the faster charging - presumably at the EA 350 kW chargers. (Almost all the CCS charging sites ABRP chose were EA sites.) Model 3 still rocks over the other two. And as V3 Supercharging gets deployed along the route the Tesla times will get faster as well.
Most other non-Tesla EVs I tried had estimated times in the high 50 and low 60 hour range. A few are worse. Combination of the longer path through Utah/Colorado/Midwest, lower range, and much slower DC FC.
One other surprise: ABRP can now do Aptera estimates. Due to its much higher efficiency, an Aptera with 100 kWh battery pack has the best estimated times of all: 4:46 charging, 41:36 driving, 2821 miles, 46:22 total. It'll be interesting to see if they can actually produce them this time around.
Model 3 LR RWD Aero (like mine): 6:11 charging, 43:09 driving, 2812 miles, 49:20 total time
Model S LR Raven: 7:24 charging, 43:08 driving, 2815 miles, 50:32 total time
Taycan Turbo w/HPC: 6:50 charging, 45:54 driving, 2905 miles, 52:44 total
The 90 mile mileage difference is due to different routing. ABRP routes Teslas on I-40/I-44 ("Route 66") across the Southwest, whereas Taycan must drive up to Utah, take I-70 across Colorado, and then I-80. When EA or some other charging outfit someday installs more CCS charging - specifically between Barstow and Flagstaff, and between Albuquerque and Amarillo, the Taycan will be able to use the shorter path.
So these times are fairly close. Taycans worse efficiency over Model S is largely made up for by the faster charging - presumably at the EA 350 kW chargers. (Almost all the CCS charging sites ABRP chose were EA sites.) Model 3 still rocks over the other two. And as V3 Supercharging gets deployed along the route the Tesla times will get faster as well.
Most other non-Tesla EVs I tried had estimated times in the high 50 and low 60 hour range. A few are worse. Combination of the longer path through Utah/Colorado/Midwest, lower range, and much slower DC FC.
One other surprise: ABRP can now do Aptera estimates. Due to its much higher efficiency, an Aptera with 100 kWh battery pack has the best estimated times of all: 4:46 charging, 41:36 driving, 2821 miles, 46:22 total. It'll be interesting to see if they can actually produce them this time around.
Last edited: