TMC is an independent, primarily volunteer organization that relies on ad revenue to cover its operating costs. Please consider whitelisting TMC on your ad blocker and becoming a Supporting Member. For more info: Support TMC
  1. TMC is currently READ ONLY.
    Click here for more info.

Price gouging continues on the 3. Can't say I'm surprised.

Discussion in 'Model 3' started by timk225, Jul 29, 2017.

Tags:
  1. neroden

    neroden Model S Owner and Frustrated Tesla Fan

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2011
    Messages:
    14,676
    Location:
    Ithaca, NY, USA
    The upcharge on big batteries for Model S back in 2013 was much worse than that: $10,000 for about 10 kWh, so you can calculate the profit. I think a $9000 upcharge for 20 kWh is exceedingly reasonable (it's less than half as much per kWh!)

    The big batteries are a profit center for Tesla, and that's been true since Model S came out.

    People absolutely should be price-gouged for choosing less-efficient wheels for idiotic aesthetic reasons. The gaps between spokes have no function on a modern wheel -- they were to dissipate brake heat, but friction brakes get used so little on the Tesla, that's not a needed function. Choosing such wheels is basically choosing to waste energy in favor of looks, like a light show at Vegas. Expect to pay through the nose for such frippery.

    I think the Model 3 Aero wheels look great. They will give the car more range. They will also be better in the winter than idiotic spoke wheels, since they prevent snow from getting inside the wheel wells. (This is personal experience with both types of wheels on Model S.)

    If you want to have less efficent, less functional wheels for your peacock-strutting desires, Tesla will take your money. Good for them.

    They've been crippling charging on Model S for a while now for stupid reasons anyway; I keep getting kicked down to 32 amps when my house circuit can handle 40 amps because of some really stupid algorithms programmed by stupid people at Tesla in response to an unrelated fire. (And I have the good old 72 amp charger!)

    I suspect that higher-powered inverters are actually expensive right now; there are signs of this in the solar panel industry. I think the smaller-ampacity charger actually costs Tesla *significantly* less which is why this is a differentiation point.
     
    • Disagree x 2
  2. dragonxt

    dragonxt Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2016
    Messages:
    627
    Location:
    Bay Area
    Any numbers in increased efficiency on Aero wheels? 1.x percent?
     
  3. neroden

    neroden Model S Owner and Frustrated Tesla Fan

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2011
    Messages:
    14,676
    Location:
    Ithaca, NY, USA
    I have to agree with this. The effective base price for the car is $36,000, because black's not acceptable to a supermajority of buyers. They've just discounted black by $1000 in order to maintain the claim that the base price is $35,000.

    That said, with this much demand, they can get away with stuff like that.
     
    • Like x 1
  4. neroden

    neroden Model S Owner and Frustrated Tesla Fan

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2011
    Messages:
    14,676
    Location:
    Ithaca, NY, USA
    Nobody's actually sure because nobody's been able to do a *controlled* test - there are too many other variables. It seems to be between 1% and 7% depending on conditions.

    It makes a ridiculously huge difference, however, if the non-aero wheels are sucking sticky snow through the wheel into the inside of the wheel well, which happened to me under particular weather conditions.
     
    • Like x 1
  5. neroden

    neroden Model S Owner and Frustrated Tesla Fan

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2011
    Messages:
    14,676
    Location:
    Ithaca, NY, USA
    It does irritate me that the 18" wheels for Model 3 won't fit on a Model S, or I'd buy those unwanted aero rims off the people who don't want them. :)
     
  6. AB4EJ

    AB4EJ Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2015
    Messages:
    771
    Location:
    Tuscaloosa, AL
    Here is a nearly foolproof way of coming to terms with "Tesla price gouging" : buy some Tesla stock.

    Then you are incentivized to do what it takes to ensure Tesla stays in business. Which they have to make a profit (at least eventually) to do.

    After Tesla fills the backlog of demand for the Model 3, it's going to be challenging enough for them to be profitable going forward... to sell enough EVs to make use of the huge capacity of the Model 3 line, and do it at a profit... without people insisting that they sell cars and options at cost.
     
    • Like x 2
  7. neroden

    neroden Model S Owner and Frustrated Tesla Fan

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2011
    Messages:
    14,676
    Location:
    Ithaca, NY, USA
    The base model will take a while to show up.

    They're obviously having some issues with the production ramp on the general assembly line and don't want to introduce interior variation.

    Battery pack variation is fine because they just slot in one of two different parts with identical form factors. Same with wheel variation. Paint shop is set up to handle paint variation. Software choices require even less work. But the "Premium Upgrades" vs. not having them creates issues on the general assembly line, issues they have already been having problems with on the S & X lines. There is definitely a possibility that the base model will not be released if those issues are not solvable, though I expect they'll do everything they possibly can to solve those issues.
     
    • Like x 2
    • Informative x 1
  8. cwerdna

    cwerdna Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2012
    Messages:
    3,343
    Location:
    SF Bay Area, CA
    #88 cwerdna, Jul 30, 2017
    Last edited: Jul 30, 2017
    No, it wasn't $10K per 10 kWh. Each capacity (40 to 60 to 85 kWh) was spaced $10K apart. It was very simple for the Tesla rep in the showroom I'd set foot in to explain.

    You can see the original pricing at 2013 Model S Price Increase | Blog | Tesla Motors. Current URL at 2013 Model S Price Increase, after they switched domains.

    So, it was $10K to go up 20 kWh and another $10K to add another 25 kWh.
     
  9. boiler81

    boiler81 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2016
    Messages:
    711
    Location:
    Manson, WA
    Since Tesla believes there will be significant sales cannibalized from Model S, they have to ensure the Model 3 replaces those profits.
    So Model 3 gets over priced options, probably until the they achieve the return on their huge investment, and/or they get real competition.
     
  10. JoRey

    JoRey Current Volt Owner, Aspiring Model III Owner

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2016
    Messages:
    186
    Location:
    Anaheim, CA
    The new leaf is set to have a autopilot competitor and is rummered to have at least two battery choices. Perhaps a 40 Kwh and 60 Kwh choice. If they are able to solve the issues they have had with their battery longevity and undercut the Model III by a significant amount. Maybe then we can see some reductions on autopilot software. Im sure the bolt will get a revision by the end of this year that will include some advanced cruise control and auto-steer options.
     
  11. MXWing

    MXWing Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2016
    Messages:
    7,258
    Location:
    USA
    Do you have sources? All of the above sounds like theory speak to me. Just doesn't sound like to me Nissan or GM is anywhere close to having a patch delivery system that allows them to make adjustments/corrections to any semi-autonomous software.

    My Gen 2 Volt doesn't have TACC and will die without TACC. Glad it's a lease.
     
  12. AustinPowers

    AustinPowers Total Smeghead

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2012
    Messages:
    2,065
    Location:
    Frankfurt, Germany
    #92 AustinPowers, Jul 31, 2017
    Last edited: Jul 31, 2017
    Ever bought a BMW, or a Merc, or an Audi? :p

    Don't get me wrong, I would also like the bigger battery to be cheaper, and the wheel design (not size) of the 19inch option as standard. However I fully understand why Tesla is acting (and needs to act) this way economically. I am rather more concerned that the Model 3 that I want will cost around 60K Euro in the end, thanks to import duties and German tax. Nothing that Tesla can do much about. But knowing that thanks to generous incentives (and lack of the abovementioned extra costs), someone in California for example can get a well optioned Model 3 for the equivalent of less than 40K Euro, while we here would have to pay more than 20K Euro more for the same car - now that is something to be angry/sad about, not so much Tesla's pricing structure.
     
    • Like x 1
  13. JoRey

    JoRey Current Volt Owner, Aspiring Model III Owner

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2016
    Messages:
    186
    Location:
    Anaheim, CA
    Im speculating on the Bolt. But the Leaf will have a feature called propilot and GM has super cruise that could be retrofitted on the bolt. Autonomous cars and EV's are set to launch by 2020 from almost all major manufacturers.



     
  14. Canuck

    Canuck Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2013
    Messages:
    6,125
    Location:
    South Surrey, BC
    In my view, you're fooling yourself if you think the Bolt and Leaf will cut into Model 3 sales because people can save a few bucks once their AP catches up. If we've learned anything from the Model S, it's that people will stretch to own a Tesla. That's because if you park a Leaf, Bolt and Tesla 3 in a parking lot, there's simply no issue as to which one people will be interested in, and will gravitate towards. Even though there's a certain amount of subjectivity in aesthetics, we know when people get it wrong, and we know who got it wrong and who got it right when it comes to design.

    Add to that no supercharging network, so you can't take them anywhere without relying on public chargers (no thanks!), and the Leaf and Bolt fall further behind Tesla. In my view, the Model 3 will seriously cut into Leaf and Bolt sales, and not the other way around. It's too bad since we want more competition in the EV market but I still see none that interests me, and I also own a Leaf as well as my Tesla.
     
    • Like x 4
  15. chronopc

    chronopc Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2017
    Messages:
    2,873
    Location:
    California
  16. drj3

    drj3 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2016
    Messages:
    144
    Location:
    Idaho
    As a shareholder and a Model 3 reservation holder I see both sides of the issue. Yes, reality has set in, and the Model 3 I want will be costing more than I had planned to spend, but it still looks like a great car and I have no plans to cancel my order. As a shareholder, I'm happy with the pricing. When you're getting mostly rave initial reviews from the press, and you have reservations for over a year of production while anti-selling a car - it would be foolish not to charge premium prices for upgrades. Tesla has delivered on everything promised at the reveal - 215+ miles of range, car substantially the same as the prototype first displayed, likely to get 5 star safety ratings, and base model at the promised price. Much of people's unmet expectations were based on fan speculation and probably unrealistic hopes. I'm thrilled that they actually started production on time, based on Tesla's track record with other models, that is the biggest surprise.
     
    • Like x 3
  17. FlyF4

    FlyF4 Son of a MX

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2017
    Messages:
    823
    Location:
    moved to San Diego
    Yea, I was sort of thinking the same thing. In my opinion, if my electric utility is charging 3 times the price of every other utility and it is the only choice I have, then it "MIGHT" be price gouging. However, if I have many choices of cars to buy and I consider supply and demand along with other factors, it isn't price gouging. If I think the price is too much for the features I want, then I look elsewhere.
     
    • Like x 2
  18. jtpassat

    jtpassat Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2015
    Messages:
    391
    Location:
    Providence, RI
    nice troll thread.
     
  19. SnakeDoctorTD

    SnakeDoctorTD Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2017
    Messages:
    72
    Location:
    Houston
    Most of your post here is spot on, but come on, Tesla made EVs "sexy." It's not unreasonable for buyers to want their sexy Model 3 to have sexy wheels too. It's like having a smoking hot partner, who got dressed to impress, yet decided on Crocs for his/her feet. As comfortable as those Crocs may be, they are arguably ugly. Maybe not the best analogy, but you get it.

    1500 for wheels and tires? I'd take that deal.
     
  20. adaptabl

    adaptabl Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2018
    Messages:
    776
    Location:
    Canada
    Now you can pay $2,000.00 for white vinyl instead of black vinyl. That is 100% profit. Really....
     

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Formed in 2006, Tesla Motors Club (TMC) was the first independent online Tesla community. Today it remains the largest and most dynamic community of Tesla enthusiasts. Learn more.
  • Do you value your experience at TMC? Consider becoming a Supporting Member of Tesla Motors Club. As a thank you for your contribution, you'll get nearly no ads in the Community and Groups sections. Additional perks are available depending on the level of contribution. Please visit the Account Upgrades page for more details.


    SUPPORT TMC