Hi, new to the forums. Can't afford a Tesla yet but the cars are great :biggrin:.
I have done "extensive research" the last two weeks about TSLA and there is some missing pieces I wonder if anyone here knows about.
I have come to the conclusion that demand and production of Model S and Model X matters a whole lot for the free cash flow they can generate and hence for the risk of dilution and capital problems the coming two years. This might sound obvious but in general the focus on discussion from analysts and commentators are Gigafactory, Model 3, timelines, capital and cash burn and less about demand, margins and production of Model S and Model X.
Going forward I think ASP of close to $90k, decreasing battery cost and economy of scale means that Model S and Model X operating margins will be really good and it will perhaps even be enough for the capital requirements they have, or atleast can fund the large majority of it. Tesla has a high level of vertical integration, is selling directly to consumers so the S+X Fremont line will be increasing profitable. This is something I think is talked about too little among analysts and commentators. I have seen the target 90k-100k in total for Model S and Model X 2016, and to me it seems very likely the demand will be there to increase that and grow demand atleast 30% YoY to reach 125k 2017 and perhaps 150k 2018. If they can also produce these numbers it would mean the capital requirements for the Gigafactory (~$2B) and the model 3 line (~1B) as well as remaining development cost of Model 3 and SuperCharger expansion could come entirely from the S+X line and with some left to spare. It would also mean that Model 3 does not need to do 400k to reach the 500k target in 2020 (a target I don't think they will hit, but don't need to)
So, I wonder if anyone knows how "easy" it would be to expand the production of Model S+X to reach say 150k 2018? Afaik the current line has not capacity for it, or would it be as simple as doing another shift? If a new line is required, how easy/hard would it be to build that by for example duplicating the current line? Would be awesome to get some ideas about this :smile:.
Cheers,
Markus
I have done "extensive research" the last two weeks about TSLA and there is some missing pieces I wonder if anyone here knows about.
I have come to the conclusion that demand and production of Model S and Model X matters a whole lot for the free cash flow they can generate and hence for the risk of dilution and capital problems the coming two years. This might sound obvious but in general the focus on discussion from analysts and commentators are Gigafactory, Model 3, timelines, capital and cash burn and less about demand, margins and production of Model S and Model X.
Going forward I think ASP of close to $90k, decreasing battery cost and economy of scale means that Model S and Model X operating margins will be really good and it will perhaps even be enough for the capital requirements they have, or atleast can fund the large majority of it. Tesla has a high level of vertical integration, is selling directly to consumers so the S+X Fremont line will be increasing profitable. This is something I think is talked about too little among analysts and commentators. I have seen the target 90k-100k in total for Model S and Model X 2016, and to me it seems very likely the demand will be there to increase that and grow demand atleast 30% YoY to reach 125k 2017 and perhaps 150k 2018. If they can also produce these numbers it would mean the capital requirements for the Gigafactory (~$2B) and the model 3 line (~1B) as well as remaining development cost of Model 3 and SuperCharger expansion could come entirely from the S+X line and with some left to spare. It would also mean that Model 3 does not need to do 400k to reach the 500k target in 2020 (a target I don't think they will hit, but don't need to)
So, I wonder if anyone knows how "easy" it would be to expand the production of Model S+X to reach say 150k 2018? Afaik the current line has not capacity for it, or would it be as simple as doing another shift? If a new line is required, how easy/hard would it be to build that by for example duplicating the current line? Would be awesome to get some ideas about this :smile:.
Cheers,
Markus