Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Q3 2013 results - projections and expectations

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Ahh yes, my mistake. I think the English on this one is poor. This is my understanding of what they are saying by using two different words to explain those numbers:
They are getting "Deliveries" of 5580 (Cars recognized in Q3 Revenue) but "Sales" of 6200 in Q3 (Meaning 6200-5580 = 620 in transit)
 
Ahh yes, my mistake. I think the English on this one is poor. This is my understanding of what they are saying by using two different words to explain those numbers:
They are getting "Deliveries" of 5580 (Cars recognized in Q3 Revenue) but "Sales" of 6200 in Q3 (Meaning 6200-5580 = 620 in transit)

Ah yes, that is probably the mistake they are making. They think that in-transit cars is the same as international sales. If I read it that way, the article makes sense.
 
The time is almost here! My final predictions...

Deliveries: 5900 (I think they were over 570/wk for a few weeks in Sept.)
ASP: $100,500
GM: 20%
2014 guidance: 40,000
Wild-card: A more specific date will be given for the start of Model X production.
 
FWIW, here is my estimate:

Deliveries 6600
ASP (k$) 102
GM ex ZEV (k$) 21,5 %
EU deliveries 1.26

Non-GAAP
Cars and CARB credits 673.200
ZEV credits 25.000
Development services 1.000
Total revenues 699.200 0

Gross profit 169.953

R&D expenses 55.000
Selling, G&A expenses 60.000

Net income 54.953
Net income/share 0,45

GAAP
Revenues (non-GAAP) 699.200
Deferred due to lease accounting 185.031
Revenues (GAAP) 514.169

Net income (non-GAAP) 54.953
Deferred profit -38.116
Stock based comp -23.000
Non-cash interest on convertibles) -1.791
Net Income (loss) (GAAP) -7.954
EPS GAAP -0,07

@Don Pedro: Thank You very much for Your Excel-sheet! Its very helpful and greatly appreciated!


Disclosure: no position (out of cash)
 
Last edited:
FWIW, here is my estimate:

Non-GAAP
Cars and CARB credits 673.200 Deliveries 6600
ZEV credits 25.000 ASP (k$) 102
Development services 1.000 GM ex ZEV (k$) 21,5 %
Total revenues 699.200 EU deliveries 1.260

Gross profit 169.953

R&D expenses 55.000
Selling, G&A expenses 60.000

Net income 54.953
Net income/share 0,45

GAAP
Revenues (non-GAAP) 699.200
Deferred due to lease accounting 185.031
Revenues (GAAP) 514.169

Net income (non-GAAP) 54.953
Deferred profit -38.116
Stock based comp -23.000
Non-cash interest on convertibles) -1.791
Net Income (loss) (GAAP) -7.954
EPS GAAP -0,07

Wow. I hope you are right, but I think you are high.
 
Wow. I hope you are right, but I think you are high.

Well...i am on painkillers (backache) but i dont feel high. :-D /scnr

Granted, it surely feels like a very bullish estimate for me as well. In the end its the delivery number. I counted registrations in every country so it should be fairly accurate, but its really a test balloon. We will see shortly how this method is working out - if at all.

Good luck to every Tesla enthusiast!
 
Well...i am on painkillers (backache) but i dont feel high. :-D /scnr

i see what you did there.png
 
Davet,
I agree with you that by itself the assignment of VINs is not a reliable indicator. That is sort of my reason for my Q2 analysis first to show a metric on HOW unreliable the VINS are and how I came up with my magic PROPORTION (83.9%) number noted below. I first looked at Q2 actual deliveries (5150) and compared it to the difference between actual delivered cars VINs at start of Q2 to end of Q2. 5150 turns out to be 83.9% of that number. Therefore, I took that same PROPORTION (83.9%) and applied it to the difference between actual delivered cars VINs at start of Q3 to end of Q3.
i think the 83.9% PROPORTION is key for my estimate, and am tempted to do the same thing for Q1 to see if its also close to 83.9% but there were no cars being made for Europe at the end of Q1 and if I remember correct they had a lot of temp workers in Q1 so those two things combined I'm not sure if that would make a completely different PROPORTION number or not.

If you or anyone can tell me what they think the fallacies in using this 83.9% PROPORTION method are then please let me know

You should not try to base any analysis off of this. Tesla spent 80% of the quarter assigning VIN's in a linear fashion and the other 20% assigning VIN's in vertical production bins. This quarter is 100% vertical production bins with backfill into the end of Q2 bins.

The bifurcation of Q2 into two different methods makes the proportion meaningless for Q3, and the backfill into Q2 might probably makes it problematic if we try to apply it to Q4. And to the extent that it works, Tesla will read these posts and change the ratio.

- - - Updated - - -

I'm not sure how people got to the point of expecting more than this. This (570) is a phenomenal number and should be celebrated! Manufacturing is a complex dance and you don't get to a number like this without a lot of effort.

Congrats to all the folks on the line and supporting functions who made this happen. :)

Here's to seeing 600/week by EOY.

This +100

- - - Updated - - -

I am having hard time to believe that Tesla will deliver less than 5000 - 7000 cars to Europe. After all both Elon and Guillen (interview with German Manager Magazin) stating that Tesla is doing everything possible to deliver cars to European customers who waited so long. I would not dismiss Elons words during the Geneva auto show so easily.

Based on my last analysis of Europe (which I admit is getting dated), Tesla's sales in Europe are just not consistent with 5,000-7,000 cars. Outside of a few bright spots (like Norway) their underlying sales rate has been pretty terrible as of 2 months ago when I last took a good look at this. Thanks to the waiting list they might get to 5,000 for 2013, but I just don't see 7,000 as being possible.

Frankly their sales infrastructure in Europe has been pretty terrible, and their move to correct that was belated at best. I'll admit that it's possible that there has been a turnaround since I looked at this, or that my analysis was flawed in the first instance, but until I see non-pathetic delivery numbers from the 3 major markets (Germany, France and Britain) I will continue to believe that Tesla (and Elon) were simply guilty of presuming that their sales success in California (which accounts for the lions share of their U.S. sales) would automatically translate into global success.

I think that it's foolish to assume that when the Tesla brand is damaged goods in the only English speaking country in Europe (where we might have a reasonable expectation that a U.S. cultural phenomenon will immediately translate), while one of the other two major markets is home to Tesla's primary competitors who can rely on "Made in Germany" sales tactics. And the third major market (and indeed much of the rest of Europe) shares the same currency and a common market with Tesla's German competitors.

If Tesla is going to succeed in Europe, it's my opinion that it will take a sustained sales effort far beyond what they have done in the U.S., and the available evidence is that their sales infrastructure and effort is still far inferior to what they have in the U.S.
 
Tesla Motors, Inc. – Third Quarter 2013 Shareholder Letter

• Record 5,500 Model S deliveries
• Gross margin increased to 21% (non-GAAP) excluding ZEV credits
• Net income (non-GAAP) of $16 million
• Major WW expansion of service centers, stores and Superchargers
• Cash balance nonetheless increased by $49 million to $796 million
• Ramping production to meet growing demand in 2014

HTML: http://ir.teslamotors.com/secfiling.cfm?filingid=1193125-13-427630&CIK=1318605

PDF: http://files.shareholder.com/downlo...93125-13-427630/1318605/1193125-13-427630.pdf
 
Tesla Motors, Inc. – Third Quarter 2013 Shareholder Letter

• Record 5,500 Model S deliveries
• Gross margin increased to 21% (non-GAAP) excluding ZEV credits
• Net income (non-GAAP) of $16 million
• Major WW expansion of service centers, stores and Superchargers
• Cash balance nonetheless increased by $49 million to $796 million
• Ramping production to meet growing demand in 2014

HTML: http://ir.teslamotors.com/secfiling.cfm?filingid=1193125-13-427630&CIK=1318605

PDF: http://files.shareholder.com/downlo...93125-13-427630/1318605/1193125-13-427630.pdf

Excellent letter. Raised 2013 guidance to 21,500.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.