TMC is an independent, primarily volunteer organization that relies on ad revenue to cover its operating costs. Please consider whitelisting TMC on your ad blocker or making a Paypal contribution here: paypal.me/SupportTMC

Racer.com: Charged Up

Discussion in 'News' started by TEG, Nov 8, 2009.

  1. TEG

    TEG TMC Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2006
    Messages:
    17,252
    Location:
    Silicon Valley
  2. Tim

    Tim Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2008
    Messages:
    60
    I like these type of reviews. While certainly not unvarnished praise, it compares the roadster to other supercars in a no compromise sort of way. This is the next step for EV adoption where they can be compared to ICE cars directly without apologizing for the short-comings of BEVs. Similarly to what hybrids have had to go through. I imagine that in less than 10 years ICE supercars will not be able to compete with EVs performance or cost wise.
     
  3. doug

    doug Administrator / Head Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2006
    Messages:
    15,914
    Location:
    Stanford, California
    #3 doug, Nov 9, 2009
    Last edited: Nov 10, 2009
    From the article:
    I wonder how accurate those current numbers are and where the author got them.

    Tesla Motors - performance specs
    16% higher peak power, 7% more torque, but with 25% higher peak current. Lends further credence to this: Sport vs. Non-Sport the same motor?
     
  4. rolosrevenge

    rolosrevenge Dr. EVS

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2009
    Messages:
    1,851
    Location:
    Right behind you...
  5. malcolm

    malcolm Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2006
    Messages:
    2,143
  6. dpeilow

    dpeilow Moderator

    Joined:
    May 23, 2008
    Messages:
    8,572
    Location:
    Winchester, UK
    They've been mentioned in other stories recently.
     
  7. doug

    doug Administrator / Head Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2006
    Messages:
    15,914
    Location:
    Stanford, California
    Additional coils compared to what, though. Compared to the base 2010MY Roadster motor or to the 2008MY motor. I'm pretty sure the latter is true, just not so sure about the former. I'm not particularly concerned either way. Just my physics intuition says the increased Sport performance could be from the increased current alone. Then again the author's information might be incorrect.
     
  8. Tim

    Tim Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2008
    Messages:
    60
    I don't think having a hand wound motor would increase the current rating like the article mentioned. More turns means more flux for the same amount of current and higher power for a given voltage and speed, but the current limit is more a function of the PEMs IGBTs and heat dissipation of the motor. I'd like to see some confirmation of the 25% peak current increase from someone at Tesla before I believed it. I remember reading from someone at Tesla that the 2010 motor is constructed somewhat differently(and more efficiently) than the 2008, but I haven't ever heard of a PEM upgrade for the sport.

    That being said, I agree with Doug that the numbers as given by the article don't make sense.
     
  9. rsquared99

    rsquared99 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2008
    Messages:
    239
    Location:
    Surprise AZ
    When I had an overheat problem this summer, the service department swapped the PEM here at my home in Arizona. The PEM that was FedEx'd to my home was labeled a sport PEM. Neither the tech or I noticed that until he had done the swap and discovered the difference in testing. So, he remained in town overnight while they sent him the proper cabling so he could reconfigure the sport PEM to a non-sport PEM. So, there is a difference in the software, not necessarily physically. In the end, it all made no difference in that the engineers determined my original PEM was fine and had done what it was designed to do. They reinstalled the original PEM and decided to make a software adjustment to the heat limit the PEM was supposed to allow.
     

Share This Page