You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Except with me driving. I can't seem to control my right foot on the accelerator!That being said the LR RWD is so darn efficient, that number of rated miles would probably never be a problem!
03/19 build P3D+. Recently (~6 weeks ago) dropped to 265 @ 90%. Been all over the map recently (low 263, high 272) but seems to have settled in at 265. I'm at 11k miles.I wonder if there was a bad batch of batteries last September. I'd need to re-read the entire thread to confirm but all of the build dates of the problematic cars was Sept. '18 IIRC.
Exactly the same for me.10/2018 build date AWD 90% charge is around 263-265.
12500 miles.
The production date may be a distraction, and it may be more related to miles. Most cars of the same production date have similar miles on them. Maybe this is a 10-12k mike thing?Exactly the same for me.
10/2018 build date AWD 90% charge is around 263-265.
12500 miles.
That’s where my first noticeable tick down was, around 12K. That was only 2% (to 305), then a slow slope to 298 around 18K(?) then near flat for about 20K more.The production date may be a distraction, and it may be more related to miles. Most cars of the same production date have similar miles on them. Maybe this is a 10-12k mike thing?
My car API shows only 283 mile range at 28K miles an 1 year old. I made an appointment for the calculated amperage capacity reset. Here is the text I got yesterday from Tesla service:
Performed remote diagnosis on the high voltage (HV) battery. During testing found the battery management system is operating without fault at this time. During review of driving habits I found for the last 27,470 miles the wh/mi where 281wh/mi. For max driving range the vehicle needs to be at 245 Wh/mi. During the review of the charging habits of the vehicle it was noted the vehicle is not being deep cycled often. Technician recommends setting the charge limit to 80% or 90% and not plugging in the vehicle until it reaches 20% . This will allow the battery management system to make the best estimate of displayed range. The HV battery performing optimally based on fleet averages. No repairs are needed at this time, displayed range is purely an estimated value based on operating conditions and ambient conditions.
They then cancelled my appointment. So these guys are saying essentially that the rated range is based upon my driving history. This contradicts what I have read on this forum before. Not sure what to belive at this point.
08/2018 build date P3D. Last 90% charge was at 263 miles. 12,500 miles.10/2018 build date AWD 90% charge is around 263-265.
12500 miles.
It does this if your battery isn’t balanced enough. The voltages across the modules/cells vary too much too allow charging to continue so the BMS stops the charging until it has time to balance enough.My attempted LR AWD "full charge" yesterday stopped at 97% (285 mi indicated) before stopping. I thought the cars would continue to charge to "100% indicated", even with degradation. What's with this?
View attachment 467946
My car API shows only 283 mile range at 28K miles an 1 year old. I made an appointment for the calculated amperage capacity reset. Here is the text I got yesterday from Tesla service:
Performed remote diagnosis on the high voltage (HV) battery. During testing found the battery management system is operating without fault at this time. During review of driving habits I found for the last 27,470 miles the wh/mi where 281wh/mi. For max driving range the vehicle needs to be at 245 Wh/mi. During the review of the charging habits of the vehicle it was noted the vehicle is not being deep cycled often. Technician recommends setting the charge limit to 80% or 90% and not plugging in the vehicle until it reaches 20% . This will allow the battery management system to make the best estimate of displayed range. The HV battery performing optimally based on fleet averages. No repairs are needed at this time, displayed range is purely an estimated value based on operating conditions and ambient conditions.
They then cancelled my appointment. So these guys are saying essentially that the rated range is based upon my driving history. This contradicts what I have read on this forum before. Not sure what to belive at this point.
It's not. I hate to disparage a Tesla tech or come off as condescending but most franchise mechanics are adept at very few tasks and might be able to perform what to you and I seems like insanely complicated jobs but often they do so without even a basic understanding what caused the very failure they're fixing. It's a flowchart. Try this. If this is broken, fix. If this is not broken check x. If x is broken, fix. If x is ok check the resistance of y.
I had a friend who was an Audi mechanic. He specialized in the R8's and performed all the engine out services. He knew how to remove an engine and replace components but he had a tenuous grasp of the inner workings of the engine.
Teslas (at least since the S) have never displayed range taking driving habits into account. They don't do this despite many wishing they would! :-D It's the very reason threads like "post you're 90% charge" exist. If you don't believe me, start driving like a grandma and watch your efficiency improve while your indicated range stays the same.
I am not sure you are reading the post you quoted the same way I am. I understood the tech was saying it was the charging habits that was causing the “estimated” range to be lower and driving habits affect the true range.so again they say it’s based on driving habit. Might be so then.
Nav does, though, in some manner. At least on the Model 3, to the degree that it’s arrival estimate can be uncanny. I assumed the S & X Nav did also, but I don’t know about that?Teslas (at least since the S) have never displayed range taking driving habits into account.