My only request through out my LR 21 order was that I had the. 82KWH battery - not the 2020 75kwh battery, my adviser assured I had the 82KWH battery, when I picked up my car the tesla person was oblivious to battery size, the Tesla service said they cant tell me its proprietary information, now they tell me I got stuck with older smaller 75kwh battery, some LR21 got stuck with the older smaller battery, others got the newer bigger 82KWH battery, & we all paid the same price. I’m so upset w/ Tesla over the battery issue. My battery has degraded 2.5% in 6 months. They should offer the LR21 customers a battery swap or upgrade to the the 82KWH battery, they need to be transparent & honest re: battery size your car upon purchase
I received my M3 LR AWD MiC end September 2021 and it's a model "5C" with the LG NMC L48 battery, stated Full Pack when New in SMT, 74.5 kWh. I, like a number of others in Europe, was given a € 2000 discount on purchase. I won't say I was entirely satisfied with the transparency of Tesla over that process but they did give the discount, the guy at handover in Nantes thought I had an LFP
! I read that sort of story elsewhere too.
All that's history and over with. I will say I am really entirely satisfied with my M3 and have no regrets at all about the purchase. It's a really great car! It's got all the range I need and more. Charging at a Suc is fine even if a bit slower than the NCA chemistry batteries.
I try to look after the battery and follow
@AAKEE's advice on storage and charging. I have the luxury of not needing to use my car every day so I can store @ low SoC (as a function of ambient temperature) and then charge to use.
The attached graphic shows that based on NFP measurements from SMT for my M3 (Dusty Crophopper), I appear, to date, to have about 1.3% "degradation" since the dawn of time, 6 months ago (note, I only started measuring NPF when I got SMT, about three months ago so the first part of the graph is my extrapolation (right or wrong)). I use NFP data because it seems less "noisy" (less variance) than Full Rated Range data. I understand the data is about normal for NMC or NCA and it seems to align with the degradation chart @
teslalogger.de although I admit it's not easy to see at the start of their (generic) chart. I'm happy to be challenged on that. By extrapolation, I could have between 2 and 3% degradation @12 months, likely I guess, from calendar aging, my cyclic aging doesn't appear to be very great right now, but neither do I have enough SMT data for that at present. Overall, if I've understood from discussions elsewhere in this forum and Master Thread, these data are not unusual. Hope that helps for interpreting yours too!