You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It is a bit more than SW as the AC induction motor in S & X is inherently less capable of providing regen at low speeds than a PM motor. Electronic brake application could simulate it, but that wouldn't be regen.This is the one major feature I miss from my i3. The complete drop off in regen on the Tesla when you get down to 10mph is just annoying. It’s only software, add an aggressive regen option so those of us that would like to one pedal drive can.
It is a bit more than SW as the AC induction motor in S & X is inherently less capable of providing regen at low speeds than a PM motor. Electronic brake application could simulate it, but that wouldn't be regen.
No need for brakes: another way to do it would be to gradually apply a reverse field to the motor to bring the car to a full stop. I assumed that was how other manufacturers did it but never bothered to look into it.It is a bit more than SW as the AC induction motor in S & X is inherently less capable of providing regen at low speeds than a PM motor. Electronic brake application could simulate it, but that wouldn't be regen.
Me too, but regen would not be necessary in my version, except at final destination.I dream of a world where I never have to use my brake pedal.
On the topic, am I the only one who worries about using regenerative braking to its (current) full length? The deceleration profile seems much different than most of the regular cars around me, which would mean that people would have to ride on their brakes if they followed me to a stop. I would think that it annoys other drivers and increases the risk of a rear-end collision if I don't try to imitate stopping like everyone else. Any thoughts?
. Any thoughts?
am I the only one who worries about using regenerative braking to its (current) full length?
On the topic, am I the only one who worries about using regenerative braking to its (current) full length? The deceleration profile seems much different than most of the regular cars around me, which would mean that people would have to ride on their brakes if they followed me to a stop. I would think that it annoys other drivers and increases the risk of a rear-end collision if I don't try to imitate stopping like everyone else. Any thoughts?
The benefit is an interesting question. It's about Tesla's approach to technology, and the use of AC induction motors. With permanent magnet motors, you can suck current all the way down to zero, but with AC induction, you need current to generate the magnetic field in the rotor, and so you get the "zeno's paradox" of braking: as the speed decreases, so does the maximum possible braking force. Now, Tesla could easily bring the car to zero speed using software, but it would require actually putting current into the motor in reverse. It wouldn't actually be regenerative braking any more. Just like having the regeneration applied by the brake pedal, I think the purist design philosophy in Tesla rebels against this.Can somebody share the benefits of having the car coast instead of coming to a complete stop?
Is it possible that Tesla realised the high effectiveness of regenerative brakes means less tear and wear of brake pads and less need to change them so they changed the setting forcing us to use more brakes?