Great example! EinSV “disagrees” with my last post. I have no idea how to interpret what that is intended to express.
Is EinSV just being disagreeable? Does EinSV think the agree and disagree buttons are symmetric? Should all the buttons be removed? Should they all be retained? Does EinSV agree that Donald Trump is doing great things?
I have no idea...
The reason for my disagree, which I thought was obvious, is that I disagree that the disagree button should be removed.
Although I don't use the disagree button all that often, I do find it very helpful on occasion (in fact, I wish we'd kept the dislike button). I have given several reasons further up this thread. But let me give you another example. We have a LOT of people on TMC who seem to have no interest in buying a Tesla or in Tesla as a company. Instead, they are here to defend interests who are threatened by Tesla, such as other car companies, oil and gas interests, short sellers, etc. For example, we have a bunch of regular posters on this site who IMO appear to be here for the primary purpose of promoting GM and its products, while going out of their way to bash or find fault with Tesla, Tesla products and/or Tesla owners and prospective owners (often affectionately referred to by some of the GM promoters as fanbois, cheerleaders and the like).
I, on the other hand, am interested in Tesla, which is why I spend time on a Tesla site instead of, for example, a GM site. It is a waste of my time and energy to provide a response to all of the misstatements and misinformation being spread by all of the GM promoters (and members promoting the interests of other brands, short sellers, oil and gas interests, etc.). In many cases it is more efficient to just note my opinion with a "disagree." Usually, the reason for my disagree (and others members' disagrees) is pretty darn obvious.
I think the GM promoters (and others like them) tend to get lots of "disagrees." They would probably get more "likes" and fewer "disagrees" on a GM site. But it is their choice to spend time here on a Tesla site, so they probably shouldn't be surprised that people disagree with many of their pro-GM and anti-Tesla opinions/posts.
The "disagree" button, like the "like," "love," "helpful," "funny" and "informative" buttons, can be a very efficient way to communicate. In fact, when a post racks up 3, 5, 10 or in some cases many more disagrees, a large number of members can express their views without piling into a thread with a bunch of repetitive comments or "+1s." In fact, the list of most "Disagreed" posts has a large number of posts with over 30 disagrees -- what's the point of all of those people having to type out their opinions?
Most Disagreed Posts | Tesla Motors Club It would be a waste of everyone's time. And turning back to the example, since the GM-related comments are often posted in threads that have nothing to do with GM, responding to them would just derail the thread even more.
If I went on a GM site (Bolt, Volt, Corvette, whatever) and constantly praised Tesla and Tesla products and criticized GM, GM products, GM owners and prospective owners, I would not be at all surprised if I got hit with a bunch of "disagrees," assuming the site had that function. Even here on TMC, people don't agree with some of my posts, and sometimes they "disagree" with them. I usually have no problem figuring out why. If I don't know and care enough to ask, I could, as you did. I can't think of an example where I felt the need to do that, although there may be some I am forgetting. In any case, that's a price I personally am willing to pay to have the disagree button available.
So, bottom line, on a site where there are far too many disagreeable people saying disagreeable things and derailing threads in disagreeable ways, the disagree button is a necessary evil IMO to make it just a tiny bit more agreeable.
But that's just my opinion. I know you disagree, so feel free to hit me with the disagree button. It won't hurt my feelings one bit.