You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Except they didn't. Only evidence I have seen is NEGATIVE.they may as well slow down Model 3s.
Didn't apple deny they were slowing down people's phone until they finally admitted they were?This is getting some press now.
Tesla can change so much with over-the-air updates that it’s messing with some owners’ heads
“In a statement to The Verge, a spokesperson for Tesla said the “Model 3’s acceleration capability remains unchanged.”
I mean technically speaking, that still doesn't answer the question. They didn't say they don't limit the Model 3's acceleration.This is getting some press now.
Tesla can change so much with over-the-air updates that it’s messing with some owners’ heads
“In a statement to The Verge, a spokesperson for Tesla said the “Model 3’s acceleration capability remains unchanged.”
More like people kept accusing them of slowing them down, until one day they implemented a fix to keep the power draw low enough to stop phones with weak batteries from spontaneously shutting down, then everybody had the "proof" they needed to justify their claims for the last 10 years.Didn't apple deny they were slowing down people's phone until they finally admitted they were?
...Honestly, 0-15 mph I cannot perceive a change. It always had some torque management softening that. But from 15-45 the car had so much acceleration before. And from 35-45 it was a full power snappy little beast. You could feel the power ramp up and “hit” by 35 and now everything feels fluffy for throttle response...
The car had constant initial torque before.here.
The car had constant initial torque before. See the data here. Maybe not for your car, but certainly for the three we measured.
I’m sorry, no. If you bought a Mustang or Camaro and took it in for service, and while it was there, they secretly swapped your cam to a milder profile, detuned the ecu map, and slowed your car, and you noticed it when you got it back you would not be happy. Or at least I wouldn’t. It’s not ethical to reduce the performance of a product that the customer already bought. Changing specs and parts and rev going forward, sure. They change seats and headliners and updates in new cars as they go. But don’t reach into my car and detune it after the fact. That’s just wrongIf this is true then I guess it’s a good thing.
Anything that would increase the reliability and less repair work till 150k miles is a good thing.
I’m sorry, no. If you bought a Mustang or Camaro and took it in for service, and while it was there, they secretly swapped your cam to a milder profile, detuned the ecu map, and slowed your car, and you noticed it when you got it back you would not be happy. Or at least I wouldn’t. It’s not ethical to reduce the performance of a product that the customer already bought. Changing specs and parts and rev going forward, sure. They change seats and headliners and updates in new cars as they go. But don’t reach into my car and detune it after the fact. That’s just wrong
When the acceleration of power is constant, the torque is constant. In this case 70 kW/s (the linear power line to 40 mph) with that mass is 475Nm. It is just physics. It could have changed recently, since these samples were taken. And your car could be different. But those cars during those samples do not follow the description of how you "felt".That chart shows KW rating *NOT* being “constant” but building in a linear fashion to peak around 45-50mph, does it not? Acceleration and speed are smooth, but not “constant”...