A bit clickbait-y, i think they burried the context here http://www.reuters.com/article/us-tesla-warranty-idUSKCN0XO1M3
Link:
High warranty costs reflect Tesla’s struggle with quality
I think Daimler is the correct comparison here and Tesla comes out looking pretty good considering Tesla's lineup is all < 4 years old. MB on the on the other hand is selling cars like the G-class which hasn't changed significantly in 30 years along side other models which are refinements of earlier designs (rarely a clean sheet car + powertrain except maybe the AMG GT).
If you just broke out the new E-Class + GLE and compared to Tesla they'd probably be roughly equal. An MB doesn't warranty the powertrain for 8 years unlimited miles.
Link:
High warranty costs reflect Tesla’s struggle with quality
Last year, according to a Reuters analysis of data provided in the company's annual report, Tesla spent $1,043 per vehicle on actual repairs and set aside $2,036 in warranty accruals to cover future repairs on the vehicles it sold in 2015. It trimmed warranty expenses by 17 percent from 2014 and cut warranty accruals by 34 percent.
Meanwhile, GM spent just $400 last year for every vehicle it sold on warranty repairs and set aside $332 for future work. Ford spent $429 per vehicle and set aside $308. Daimler spent $970 per vehicle and set aside $1,294.
I think Daimler is the correct comparison here and Tesla comes out looking pretty good considering Tesla's lineup is all < 4 years old. MB on the on the other hand is selling cars like the G-class which hasn't changed significantly in 30 years along side other models which are refinements of earlier designs (rarely a clean sheet car + powertrain except maybe the AMG GT).
If you just broke out the new E-Class + GLE and compared to Tesla they'd probably be roughly equal. An MB doesn't warranty the powertrain for 8 years unlimited miles.