So a Roadster with 50k miles (!!) punctures the battery so normally TM would replace the battery with new, to be paid by owner/insurance company. But TM claims battery cannot be removed for some reason, thus TM views it as 'total loss' which by their definition means they refuse to do any work on it. Then owner finds a 3rd party that easily removes the battery and even feels they can repair the battery since the damage is about as miniscule as one could have hoped for. Not that repairing will be simple or easy but that it only involves damage to one sheet.
Once the owner had the battery removed it would seem that TM could then do a normal 50k mile battery replacement. Did they offer to do so or not? Seems with the battery out, TM could do a chassis integrity check and then #783 could get on with its useful life.
#764 here- hate to see it orphaned like this.
--