Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register
  • We just completed a significant update, but we still have some fixes and adjustments to make, so please bear with us for the time being. Cheers!

Roadster 3.0

DrComputer

Active Member
Jan 29, 2009
1,122
353
Sherman Oaks, CA
Here's an e-mail from Tesla that I just received:

Roadster 3.0
Battery technology has continued a steady improvement in recent years, as has our experience in optimizing total vehicle efficiency. We have long been excited to apply our learning back to our first vehicle, and are thrilled to do just that with the prototype Roadster 3.0 package. It consists of three main improvement areas.

Batteries
The original Roadster battery was the very first lithium ion battery put into production in any vehicle. It was state of the art in 2008, but cell technology has improved substantially since then. We have identified a new cell that has 31% more energy than the original Roadster cell. Using this new cell we have created a battery pack that delivers roughly 70kWh in the same package as the original battery.

Aerodynamics
The original Roadster had a drag coefficient (Cd) of 0.36. Using modern computational methods we expect to make a 15% improvement, dropping the total Cd down to 0.31 with a retrofit aero kit.

Rolling Resistance
The original Roadster tires have a rolling resistance coefficient (Crr) of 11.0 kg/ton. New tires that we will use on the Roadster 3.0 have a Crr of roughly 8.9 kg/ton, about a 20% improvement. We are also making improvements in the wheel bearings and residual brake drag that further reduce overall rolling resistance of the car.

Summary
Combining all of these improvements we can achieve a predicted 40-50% improvement on range between the original Roadster and Roadster 3.0. There is a set of speeds and driving conditions where we can confidently drive the Roadster 3.0 over 400 miles. We will be demonstrating this in the real world during a non-stop drive from San Francisco to Los Angeles in the early weeks of 2015.

We are confident that this will not be the last update the Roadster will receive in the many years to come.

Happy Holidays.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KidDoc

Doug_G

Lead Moderator
Apr 2, 2010
17,877
3,337
Ottawa, Canada
Now that we know this thread is really about "Roadster 3.0", I have renamed the thread. Again! :biggrin:

Oh and I made the thread sticky.
 

djp

Model 3 Performance
Aug 28, 2011
1,120
59
Toronto, Canada
Woah - that's awesome, but not what we expected at all! They're not using a Model S cell, but one with a lot LESS capacity. I wonder if the S cells would have been too heavy?
 

dpeilow

Moderator
May 23, 2008
9,151
888
Winchester, UK
Disappointing. 50% improvement is 366 miles under the old EPA test. Getting to 400 miles is going to require serious granny driving.

- - - Updated - - -
Okay, so 31% more energy means 3.2 Ah cells.

That's the link to the cells I just posted...

- - - Updated - - -

Woah - that's awesome, but not what we expected at all! They're not using a Model S cell, but one with a lot LESS capacity. I wonder if the S cells would have been too heavy?

No it's the same as the latest Model S. The older Model S pack was 3.1 Ah.

- - - Updated - - -

They forgot the all important £ $ €.
 

Botbldr45

Member
Oct 11, 2011
552
29
Sedona, Az
Disappointing? ........ Are you kidding!
I'll take 366 miles with a big a## Tesla grin any day!
........ and granny driving?
Just remember the Little Old Lady from Pasadena!
 

Eberhard

#421 Model S #S32
Oct 17, 2010
1,147
11
Germany
or Tesla is just using those cells which fail to pass the quality-test to match the minimum capacity for a model S pack. Tesla just downrated the cells and are still fine for the roadster 3.0 upgrade batterypack
 

JRP3

Hyperactive Member
Aug 20, 2007
19,444
42,611
Central New York
First, wow that they are doing an aero and tire upgrade as well. Second, even with that, 380 ish miles from 70kWh = 184 wh/mi, which is pretty amazing, depending on what speed they are assuming. For those familiar with the route what is a reasonable average speed for that trip?

Oh, I just saw this part:

There is a set of speeds and driving conditions where we can confidently drive the Roadster 3.0 over 400 miles.

Well you can do the same with Roadster 2.0 at 18 mph too...
 
Last edited:

Stoneymonster

Active Member
Jan 8, 2013
1,787
1,064
Aptos, Ca
For those familiar with the route what is a reasonable average speed for that trip?

Speeds are quite high on the I5 portion of route, figure 80-85mph unless you like driving between two semis. There is a significant climb at the end before dropping down into Santa Clarita before LA. It will be interesting how they plan their drive.
 

jdevo2004

Member
May 23, 2012
225
72
Looks like the cells are going to be Samsung INR18650-29E. 3.6V 2.85AH, 1C continuous, 3C discontinuous. The cells being used in the Model S require a higher degree of thermal management than the cells currently used in the Roadster so are unlikely to be suitable for the Roadster. The Samsung 29E is well suited for less thermal management situations like in the Roadster.
 

Jackyche

Member
Sep 30, 2012
319
2
Seattle
I've driven that route quite a few times with ICE. Speed limit is 70, maybe even 75. You'd get murdered rolling in 55mph on rural California highways.
 

Doug_G

Lead Moderator
Apr 2, 2010
17,877
3,337
Ottawa, Canada
Less thermal management??? Roadster regulates the cell temperature much more aggressively than Model S. It limits pack temperature to 40C whereas Model S lets it go to 60C. The Model S cell chemistry has a higher operating temperature.
 

JRP3

Hyperactive Member
Aug 20, 2007
19,444
42,611
Central New York
Looks like the cells are going to be Samsung INR18650-29E. 3.6V 2.85AH, 1C continuous, 3C discontinuous. The cells being used in the Model S require a higher degree of thermal management than the cells currently used in the Roadster so are unlikely to be suitable for the Roadster. The Samsung 29E is well suited for less thermal management situations like in the Roadster.

Not sure why you think they'd us a Samsung cell when they can get better cells from Panasonic, plus the fact that the cell you specify doesn't meet the posted specs from Tesla.
 

About Us

Formed in 2006, Tesla Motors Club (TMC) was the first independent online Tesla community. Today it remains the largest and most dynamic community of Tesla enthusiasts. Learn more.

Do you value your experience at TMC? Consider becoming a Supporting Member of Tesla Motors Club. As a thank you for your contribution, you'll get nearly no ads in the Community and Groups sections. Additional perks are available depending on the level of contribution. Please visit the Account Upgrades page for more details.


SUPPORT TMC
Top