TMC is an independent, primarily volunteer organization that relies on ad revenue to cover its operating costs. Please consider whitelisting TMC on your ad blocker and becoming a Supporting Member. For more info: Support TMC
  1. TMC is currently READ ONLY.
    Click here for more info.

Roadster 3.0

Discussion in 'Roadster 2008-2012' started by DrComputer, Dec 26, 2014.

Tags:
  1. bonnie

    bonnie I play a nice person on twitter.

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2011
    Messages:
    16,427
    Location:
    Columbia River Gorge
    Very well said. I have to admit I have been dismayed over all the 'but what about this? I want that!' responses, or even 'well it's not really 400 miles ...'.

    It's AWESOME. That's what it is. I had no expectations of any upgrade, so this is just downright awesome. There is only one response to the upgrade information (imo): Thank you, Tesla & Elon.
     
  2. Alan

    Alan Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2010
    Messages:
    271
    Location:
    UK
    Agree with the majority here - a huge thank you to Tesla & Elon.

    Even for those who do not need extra range the key point is that Tesla are continuing to support Roadster owners. We can be sure that our cars can be kept on the road for many, many years to come and if / when any of us want to sell the resale value will be higher as a result of this support.

    Personally I value acceleration & handling more than range for the Roadster so at a first glance these improvements may not offer much, seems like a team of engineers have been set a project to increase the Roadster range. Lets wait however for the full details - perhaps the new battery can deliver higher peak currents or weighs a bit less. The new aero will reduce the average power consumption at speed so the motor will heat up a little less & power limit less, perhaps it will also direct air flow to the motor more. Unsure of any of this but lets wait and see. If it does not help acceleration then I guess there is always the P85d upgrade option!
     
  3. rtz

    rtz Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2013
    Messages:
    142
    Location:
    United States
    If that's the case; then where did these come from?

    Lithium Ion 18650 EV Module - 57 Volt, 3kWh, EV West - Electric Vehicle Parts, Components, EVSE Charging Stations, Electric Car Conversion Kits
     
  4. TEG

    TEG Teslafanatic

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2006
    Messages:
    21,703
    Aren't those ones that were made for Smart EVs?
    Smart Fortwo - Tesla Battery Pack Technical Data | Forums | Tesla Motors

    - - - Updated - - -

    I am guessing that they didn't want to completely redo the Roadster hardware, and the Model S cell characteristics were not compatible with the Roadster design. I guess they found some different cells that were close enough to the Roadster behavior that they could incorporate them mainly with firmware changes.
     
  5. Benz

    Benz Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2012
    Messages:
    1,905
    Location:
    Netherlands
    2008 Tesla Roadster Battery Pack = 56 kWh maximum capacity
    2015 Tesla Roadster Battery Pack = 70 kWh maximum capacity

    That's an increase of 14 kWh in maximum capacity of the Battery Pack.

    14 kWh / 56 kWh = 25% increase

    Would that be a correct calculation?
     
  6. dpeilow

    dpeilow Moderator

    Joined:
    May 23, 2008
    Messages:
    9,151
    Location:
    Winchester, UK
    #106 dpeilow, Dec 27, 2014
    Last edited: Dec 27, 2014
    Any chance you could get it working with CHAdeMO?

    - - - Updated - - -

    I'll explain the disappointment thus:

    We knew Tesla was obliged to provide a replacement pack. We all originally expected that to be using whatever commodity cells were prevalent at the time.

    Then Elon comes out with the SF to LA claim. I think many, myself included, expected this to be using the same old EPA method that brought us the 244 mile ideal range currently - i.e. very hard to achieve but nowhere near real world everyday driving for highway speeds. We conceded that was doable using the latest cells and maybe Tesla would allow owners to use those at a price.

    However, it is clear that Tesla did go the commodity cell route and to meet this goal they are going to have to drive in a manner that really isn't representative of real world driving. It's a publicity stunt.


    So while I am grateful that Tesla has taken care of its contractual obligations to produce a new pack, once again they fail at expectation management. If they just said it's a 320 miles pack in the first place, we'd all be rejoicing.
     
  7. GSP

    GSP Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2007
    Messages:
    2,565
    The EV West modules do not look like the ones Tesla made for the Smard ED. If I remember correctly the smart pack was a different shape and too small to have these modules inside it. Perhaps they are for the B-class?

    I don't think the Roadster can use the exact cells as the model S. It could have used the same jelly roll in a consumer electronics style can that has the current interupt device and thermal interupt device like the Roadster cells do.

    However, Panasonic may not make a consumer version of the model S cell. They do make consumer 3400 mAh cells, but pricing and availability for Roadster quantities might be an issue for a tesla (just speculation).

    GSP
     
  8. dpeilow

    dpeilow Moderator

    Joined:
    May 23, 2008
    Messages:
    9,151
    Location:
    Winchester, UK
    #108 dpeilow, Dec 27, 2014
    Last edited: Dec 27, 2014
    Another interesting outcome of this is proof of real pace of development in cells.

    The original Roadster used the commodity cell available in Spring 2008. This new pack will come out in Spring 2015.

    We always hear that batteries improve at 8% per year. So we would expect the new pack to have 1.08 ^ 7 = 71% more capacity. Instead it's only 31%.

    This suggests annual improvement is more like 4%.
     
  9. Doug_G

    Doug_G Lead Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2010
    Messages:
    17,876
    Location:
    Ottawa, Canada
    Some Roadsters still have valid extended warranties.
     
  10. bonnie

    bonnie I play a nice person on twitter.

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2011
    Messages:
    16,427
    Location:
    Columbia River Gorge
    That might address some that are disappointed, but not all. Supercharging-capability, lighter pack, and more all have been mentioned by multiple people. Sometimes we need to manage our own expectations.

    Publicity stunt? It's a bit more than that. It's a LOT more than that. I appreciate the company squeezing every possible value out of every thing that they do. And as a Roadster owner, I appreciate the fact that we have not been left behind. They didn't need to do this, any of this. We had plenty of discussions here on this forum about what the real world miles would be. We all manage our own perspective of things, mine is that I just received something I wasn't expecting.
     
  11. JRP3

    JRP3 Hyperactive Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2007
    Messages:
    19,384
    Location:
    Central New York
    Something to consider, and not to discourage you from the undertaking, but wouldn't charging a non SC enabled car be considered theft of service?

    - - - Updated - - -

    That is an excellent point that I had not considered.
     
  12. scaesare

    scaesare Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2013
    Messages:
    8,178
    Location:
    NoVA
    There was a thread here previously that had documented much of the car-to-supercharger physical layer interface as well as sniffs of the protocol exchange between them. There was good progress on decoding the conversation.

    The effort has since been taken offline... but I remember a name or two. If you decide to pursue it, drop me a PM.
     
  13. PokerBroker

    PokerBroker Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2013
    Messages:
    525
    Location:
    Minneapolis, MN
    All Tesla has an obligation to provide is access to replacement parts of original specification, including the battery. I am jumping for joy at anything that improves my car in any way because I know Porsche would never dream of it. By offering retrofitable batteries with increased range, Tesla is doing something other OEMs have been unwilling or unable to do for over 100 years. I actually hope they don't invest too much into this type of activity as I would much prefer to see progress on future tech and vehicles.
     
  14. scaesare

    scaesare Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2013
    Messages:
    8,178
    Location:
    NoVA
  15. paulkva

    paulkva Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2013
    Messages:
    700
    Location:
    Falls Church, VA
    Here's a point I think many people are overlooking. One of Tesla's stated goals is to advance "sustainable transport." The most obvious part of that is clearly the move away from fossil fuel powered vehicles. Perhaps less obvious is the idea that each vehicle should be able to last longer than a conventional vehicle. And what better way to make a car last longer than to offer in-place upgrades? Model S already does so with its software.

    While I don't know for sure if part of Tesla's intent here is to show that all its cars are meant to be kept longer and periodically upgraded, rather than traded/recycled/junked in exchange for brand new ones. But upgrading the Roadster like this is certainly a good way to try to prove the concept, before they consider offering a large scale battery (or other) upgrade to Model S or future models.
     
  16. scaesare

    scaesare Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2013
    Messages:
    8,178
    Location:
    NoVA
    This ignores the constraints of the rest of the existing system, however. Just because newer chemistries are available doesn't mean that they would just slide in to a 7+ yr old engineered system.

    For instance, we already know that the Model S has a different thermal management system for it's pack as compared to the Roadster. There are many things to consider: temp characteristics, can design, energy profile, charging characteristics, energy density per kg, etc...

    If they were designing the roadster from the ground up today along with it's PEM, charging system, thermal mgm't system, wiring, etc... you would likely be able to accommodate even more advanced cells.
     
  17. PokerBroker

    PokerBroker Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2013
    Messages:
    525
    Location:
    Minneapolis, MN
    Advancing sustainable transport simply means that the technology will get better with time for new production models. Apple isn't expected to make original iPhones better to support early adopters as they are advancing smartphone technology. They are just expected to keep them operational to original spec for the duration of reasonable expected lifespan aside from wear and tear and natural degradation.
     
  18. JRP3

    JRP3 Hyperactive Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2007
    Messages:
    19,384
    Location:
    Central New York
    I don't think it's a thermal management issue, I think GSP may have nailed it. The Roadster cells had protection built in, Model S cells do not. So instead of just putting new cells into the existing structure Tesla would have to redesign the way the pack is physically constructed if they were to use the Model S cells.
     
  19. m0rph

    m0rph Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2014
    Messages:
    660
    Location:
    Belgium
    I would start with all upgrades except the battery. Mine still is at 98% but doing 6000km/month now. If it lasts another 2-3y I would be happy. Maybe 4.0 hardware with 500 miles and solar roof will be ready by then :)

    My 2 remaining Qs are: Price? Warranty?
     
  20. dsm363

    dsm363 Roadster + Sig Model S

    Joined:
    May 17, 2009
    Messages:
    18,278
    Location:
    Nevada
    I also welcome this upgrade. Sure I might not do it for a few years but it's there now. Thank you to Tesla and Elon for following through and not forgetting about Roadster owners.
     

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Formed in 2006, Tesla Motors Club (TMC) was the first independent online Tesla community. Today it remains the largest and most dynamic community of Tesla enthusiasts. Learn more.
  • Do you value your experience at TMC? Consider becoming a Supporting Member of Tesla Motors Club. As a thank you for your contribution, you'll get nearly no ads in the Community and Groups sections. Additional perks are available depending on the level of contribution. Please visit the Account Upgrades page for more details.


    SUPPORT TMC