After a hard day's work, I relaxed taking my Roadster 2.5 for a spin. Arriving home, look what the screen said: View attachment 9564 So I went 133.3 km in 49 min and consumed a total of 7.08 kWh (53 kWh/km on average) Quiz: How did I do it. I will post my answer after: a) someone else found the right answer b) one week from now whichever is first Hint: I did not go downhill Happy guessing ! The first person to post the right answer will get an invitation to Nuremburg.
I think you meant Wh/km, not kWh/km... If not drafting, perhaps someone was pushing or towing you at least part of the time? Tremendous tail-wind?
Ah, my second guess: Traveling through a tunnel for most of the trip maybe drafting as brianman said?
Johann said kWh but the screen pic said Wh, which of course it has to be. 53 kWh per km would suggest that his car was pulling a freight train car. I am baffled. I look forward eagerly to seeing the answer. I don't think even drafting could get those numbers. Maybe being towed, but nobody tows cars at that speed. And the speed makes the 53 Wh/km even more baffling. I also would not consider driving at 101 miles per hour to be relaxing. I suspect there's a hint there. 101 mph is not relaxing and would take far more than 53 Wh/km.
Could this have happened with the car transported on a truck or trailer (with the "ignition" on)? The question assumes that the distance moved is based off of the GPS rather than the odometer.
Did you really, actually go 133km? What if the tires were slipping on ice , for instance if you were "drifting" in a circle on a frozen lake? Then the speed would read artificially high, and the energy usage wouldn't be so high because you weren't actually going so fast...
Time travel. Semi-seriously: is this what the display shows if you reset the clock? Or cross a timezone boundary? Or daylight savings becomes effective?
The trip meter is obviously incorrect. I suspect the time and energy consumption are accurate, which suggests usage of 144Wh per minute of drive time. This is quite possible. Most likely, there is an error in the distance calculation due to charging and not resetting the odometer.
A truck going 101 mph??? Anyway, someone said the wheels have to be turning. Probably not a lot of frozen lakes in Germany in September.