wiztecy
Active Member
The 2.x PEMs also have significantly better cooling than the 1.5 PEMs when everything is clean. That's a big "if" because the 2.x Roadsters have an issue with the PEM fans getting dirty but if you stay on top of that they do a good job for aggressive street driving.
True, they do cool down better/quicker. When I drove a 2.0 with the blower upgrade I was amazed how fast the temps go down. But what good does fast cooling do you if you always have to be keeping the darn thing clean every 6 months to make it work as it should? Even though the 1.5 would run hotter and not cool down as fast as the 2.x PEM, it is way more consistent for cooling (my PEM temps are still where they were when I cleaned it 2+ years ago) and offers less maintenance time/cleaning-wise pulling the PEM off and cleaning it, unless you install a filter system like you did on your 2.5. Granted if you lived on a dirt road with leaves and such all over, especially pine needles, You'd most likely would be pulling the PEM off the 1.5 to clean out the electric motor cooling fins, a task that Tesla barely touches during the annual. They never cleaned mine in any of the 2 annuals that were performed there. They only clean that area if they see any indications of an issue, such as higher motor temps. But then how long do they test drive these cars, not far or long.... So I don't think they'd catch an issue there with cleaning unless the customer complained. But that's an issue for all versions.
Also I recall the small connectors, I believe two or three pin, melting on the 2.x PEMS and that connector and was found these connectors have a limited on/off duty before the coating / metal on the contacts begin break down which then appears to be increasing resistance there which then heats up and melts the connector. I do know that the 1.5 has the aircraft quality connectors (aluminum twist offs) on the PEM, I believe 3 areas. Not sure but I believe that connector was one of the three aluminum connectors on the Roadster. The 1.5 does have one or two regular plastic snap connectors as well on the PEM. I did/do love these connectors when I need to remove that PEM that's for sure, quite a snap and they back off smooth and easy. I also believe these connectors are gentler on the metal to metal contact areas of the connection.
In Tom Saxton's survey sorted by PEM swaps I see more 2.x's that had the PEM replaced via the build year.
TEG is better with the concrete answer, but I believe when the 2.0's were being built was around the end of April/May of 2009 so there will be a mix of both versions for these months... so that's not good data since we can't identify the versions with 100% certainty. But keep in mind with this sample as I mentioned before that there's close to 5x as many 2.x's on the road compared to the 1.5's, so data points will naturally be skewed towards the 2.x side of things. Only Tesla has the true data that has real meaning, we can infer from our data but subject to errors due to sampling.
Battery Survey « Plug In America
Am I reading this wrong or did you look at some other survey?
Also note that some samples of the PEM being replaced was not the PEM that created an issue, some battery failures can and have blown out the PEM or something as simple as the fuse in the PEM which isn't the PEMs fault at all.
Last edited: