I am currently in the market for a car that I believe will hold its value. The debate between my brothers and I have been mainly about a Roadster and what we believe or don't believe in it as something that will not continue to depreciate and why. In a sense this car seems to be more of a gamble than say putting our money into a porsche 993. There is a track record with the car used sales, there are parts, much more were made, the porsche market is much bigger... On the other hand that is what essentially makes this car more unique and can tilt the scale one way or the other. I personally have disregarded the technology aspect of this conversation in a simple comparison, most people are not looking for the newest and greatest when they are looking for a vintage sports car. the 2017 911 vs the 2011 911 are simply different and there will be buyers interested in the new as well as the old. That being said the bigger issue is a niche market with a niche product. This is where im the least sold. In every other aspect Im pretty much sold on getting this car. Niche in Niche is always bad but sometimes expensive. The new roadster will build more customers into the market in turn making the original more desirable if they release the new vehicle about $120K. if they release it at a lower cost and it is going to be to steal sales away from lets say a 3/4 series it will effect the original roadster value negatively. Now to the battery and fixing the car. There is less clarity on what is the lifespan of the battery. The car in question 2010 2.5 has had a 2.5 replacement in 2014 under warranty. Were the original batteries faulty? will i need to replace the 2014 battery in 2018? is there any difference between 2.5 and 3.0 besides distance? Most resale cars want original original so i dont see the benefit in moving over to 3.0. Still torn, my brothers are leaning away from the roadster and im pushing for it. looking forward to your comments.
RM
RM