Only if they’re Welsh, Scottish or Irish generally. English tend to state they’re British if asked.
The English are the dominant population on the islands. Brexit was driven by similar forces seen in the US. The dominant population is seeing its traditional power base diminish and get replaced by people who don't look like them. In the case of the UK, it's mostly non-white people moving in from the former colonies. Some English manifest guilt over the empire while others reflect back on the former glories of the British Empire and are more fiercely English than they ever were.
The history podcast I listen to is primarily two British historians and they have guests on. One of the guests was talking about what it is to be British and the English. In 1966 at the World Cup, the England team was cheered on by people waving the Union Jack. The mascot for the games had a Union Jack. But in the 80s the St George's cross started showing up at games and now it's ubiquitous.
It's a phenomenon happening all around the world. Ethnic groups are becoming more partisan to their ethnic group and wanting more autonomy, more local authority. While on the other hand some people are becoming less connected to their root culture and are being more pan-cultural, though they are the minority.
Even though I've always lived in the US, I've never felt any strong tie to the identity of this country (which is an odd animal to begin with compared to the rest of the world). As the internet has given me access to other cultures my Americaness is weaker than ever. I understand wanting to defend your home, whether that be physical dwelling or home territory from an invader, but the otherwise rah rah my "team" doesn't really grok. I regularly watch TV programs from other English speaking countries, probably more than American TV. I realized I had really internalized the slang from other countries when I saw part of a stand up routine by an Australian comedian, thought it was hilarious, and showed it to my partner. I had to explain every joke. She got it when explained, but it wasn't funny by that point.
Americans and Candians also have an odd identity thing. There are a couple of books out there by a historian named Colin Woodard. His first is called American Nations and the others build on it. He discusses that a nation is an ethnic identity and most nation states are also predominantly the home for that ethnic group. So Japan is the political entity for the people who consider themselves Japanese.
The UK has internal divisions, because it comprises multiple nations (ethnicities), but those groups also have their own country within the UK, for the most part. The tensions come in when a lot of immigrants have moved in who are from other nations.
North America is made up of 12 identified nations by Woodard and they have no political entity that contains the entire group. Many US states have more than one nation and every nation is larger than the boundary of any one state. The English speakers in Canada can only identify themselves as "not American" because they all belong to nations that cross the border. When I went to western British Columbia I could tell the culture there was the same at its core as Seattle and Portland, even though the queen was on everything and officially everything reflected back to Ontario. British Columbia was a weird mix of very familiar and different.
A lot of northern Americans look north across their border and see kinship in the Canadians living there, but the Canadians look south and see the politics and culture of the nations not shared with Canada and see aliens. Specifically The Deep South and Appalachia are uniquely American cultures. At this point most of the rest of the cultures in the US would like to eject them too.
I live right on the border between two cultures. West of the Cascade mountains in Oregon and Washington is the Left Coast culture, which is tied to the Bay Area culture. Western British Columbia is the same culture. Then eastern Washington and Oregon are what Woodard calls the Far West culture, but I call it the Interior West culture. The Left Coast culture tends to be progressive believing in creating a utopian future. High tech companies thrive in all the cities of the region.
The Interior West is more traditional and more about the land and extracting resources from it. The TV show Yellowstone is all about that culture.
This town is a push-pull of the two cultures.
Apologize if this has been posted before but this article explains Russia's resource policy:
The Russian military is a hybrid format combining a traditional cadre-and-reserve conscript system and a contract-professional system. While the Russian Army has made efforts to professionalize its ranks, particularly in the last 15 years, it remains
www.understandingwar.org
That is about 2 months old. Kamil Galeev has talked about what really happens in the Russian army. Conscripts are not paid, but contract soldiers are. Conscripts are put under tremendous pressure to enlist (become contract soldiers). The enlisted ranks of the Russian army contains virtually nobody who walked into a recruiting office and volunteered. Almost all their contract soldiers started out as conscripts and for one reason or another enlisted.
The Russian army's only professionals are the officers. Everyone else is there involuntarily.
US intelligence believes Putin is preparing for the long fight.
Thinks he can out last Western support for Ukraine. Outlast Hawks in Western capitals to be replaced by Doves.
Doesn't believe any nuclear weapons will be used unless Putin feels Russia existentially threatened. And Russia would signal to when that point is reached.
President Vladimir Putin will not end the Ukraine war with the Donbas campaign and is determined to build a land bridge to Russian-controlled territory in Moldova, US Director of National Intelligence…
www.france24.com
Hitler had dreams of repelling the Red Army all the way back to Moscow in 1945. He didn't have the forces to do it and the Russians don't have the forces to fulfill Putin's dreams now. Putin might as well dream of taking New York City. That's about as likely as Russians taking anything west of Kherson.
Their army is a dwindling resource with a coming pull by date.
The point wasn't about self-identification.
It was about the Aryan looking soldiers marching in Russia's Victory Day parade.
The point was that Caucasian muslims would look right at home in Russia's Victory day parade alongside ethnic Russians. While Buryats and other Asian minorities would look out of place and very different from ethnic Russians.
True. The Russians can use them to give the look of good white Russian soldiers.