Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register
  • We just completed a significant update, but we still have some fixes and adjustments to make, so please bear with us for the time being. Cheers!

RWD quicker after V9 2018.42.2

spurs10

Member
Aug 16, 2017
278
75
Vancouver Canada
Anyone noticing the car has been more responsive and feels quicker after the update?
I felt that way but just wanna see if it was just because the shoes I was wearing today.
 

MP3Mike

Well-Known Member
Feb 1, 2016
14,978
31,851
Oregon
Can you explain the responsiveness of the car, I thought there was really no delay with electric vehicles to begin with.

Tell that to the I-Pace drivers. (The delayed response was Bjorn's biggest complaint about the I-Pace, besides the horrible high-speed efficiency.)
 

omgwtfbyobbq

Active Member
Aug 24, 2013
1,450
1,612
Southern California
Can you explain the responsiveness of the car, I thought there was really no delay with electric vehicles to begin with.
IMO the pedal mappings from before the update were decidedly non-linear. By that I mean negative/positive acceleration versus pedal position was flat/low in the middle of the pedal's range, and was markedly higher near the ends. If I didn't feather it just right at a certain point in the pedal's travel when slowing down the car would slow down a little faster than I wanted it to, and vice versa in terms of acceleration.

The pedal mappings now are much more consistent insofar as the change in acceleration compared to the change in pedal movement is more predictable/consistent across the pedal's entire movement range. With the last version, it was relatively flat in the middle (large inputs resulted in smaller outputs) and increased sharply at each end (small inputs resulted in large outputs).
 

MMBTUS

Member
Sep 12, 2018
180
153
Palm Beach County Florida
IMO the pedal mappings from before the update were decidedly non-linear. By that I mean negative/positive acceleration versus pedal position was flat/low in the middle of the pedal's range, and was markedly higher near the ends. If I didn't feather it just right at a certain point in the pedal's travel when slowing down the car would slow down a little faster than I wanted it to, and vice versa in terms of acceleration.

The pedal mappings now are much more consistent insofar as the change in acceleration compared to the change in pedal movement is more predictable/consistent across the pedal's entire movement range. With the last version, it was relatively flat in the middle (large inputs resulted in smaller outputs) and increased sharply at each end (small inputs resulted in large outputs).
Excellent insights.

The control response you describe is one that RC aircraft pilots have known for years. It’s called “exponential” or expo. It alters the otherwise linear servo power curve to increase or decrease sensitivity at the center of servo travel. We dial in at the transmitter exactly how much expo we want. It is customary to set expo to reduce the response in the middle of the curve to smooth out flights. Doing so makes it feel exactly the same as your sense of the old firmware. More responsive at high and low control settings but less in the middle. By analogy maybe Tesla has dialed out the throttle “expo” and made the power curve more linear in the new firmware. Makes perfect sense. I’m gonna feel for it. Helps to know. Thanks.

Notice how 42.2 materially improves efficiency?
 

omgwtfbyobbq

Active Member
Aug 24, 2013
1,450
1,612
Southern California
Excellent insights.

The control response you describe is one that RC aircraft pilots have known for years. It’s called “exponential” or expo. It alters the otherwise linear servo power curve to increase or decrease sensitivity at the center of servo travel. We dial in at the transmitter exactly how much expo we want. It is customary to set expo to reduce the response in the middle of the curve to smooth out flights. Doing so makes it feel exactly the same as your sense of the old firmware. More responsive at high and low control settings but less in the middle. By analogy maybe Tesla has dialed out the throttle “expo” and made the power curve more linear in the new firmware. Makes perfect sense. I’m gonna feel for it. Helps to know. Thanks.

Notice how 42.2 materially improves efficiency?
Thanks! I'm not sure if 42.2 did anything to efficiency. I'm leaning towards yes, but I didn't have any of my routes nailed down enough to feel confident it did. And even if it did, I'm not sure if the improvement is from an actual change to the motor software, just because Tesla dialing out the throttle expo helps drivers better use regen, or both.
 

omgwtfbyobbq

Active Member
Aug 24, 2013
1,450
1,612
Southern California
Maybe they want to push the Mid Range. A lot of people on the waiting list still.
This! They went with 1 less charger board in the MR and apparently an IGBT based inverter instead of the SiC MOSFET based one in the LR. If they can get the price of those down right around the time they finish the newer/less expensive SR pack casing/penthouse, I'm hoping they can start offering a SR with the pup for $40k+. Ideally they can go straight to the $35k+ base SR, but I'm not holding my breath.
 

About Us

Formed in 2006, Tesla Motors Club (TMC) was the first independent online Tesla community. Today it remains the largest and most dynamic community of Tesla enthusiasts. Learn more.

Do you value your experience at TMC? Consider becoming a Supporting Member of Tesla Motors Club. As a thank you for your contribution, you'll get nearly no ads in the Community and Groups sections. Additional perks are available depending on the level of contribution. Please visit the Account Upgrades page for more details.


SUPPORT TMC
Top