TMC is an independent, primarily volunteer organization that relies on ad revenue to cover its operating costs. Please consider whitelisting TMC on your ad blocker and becoming a Supporting Member. For more info: Support TMC

S&P500 listing and moderator actions (out of Market Action)

Discussion in 'TSLA Investor Discussions' started by AudubonB, Aug 12, 2018.

  1. AudubonB

    AudubonB Mild-mannered Moderator Lord Vetinari*

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2013
    Messages:
    5,992
    Ugh.

    I just thought of a MonkeyWrench ex machina bizarre undesirednessmenthoodship, as follows (===>As per my MOD posts, ALL below are suppositions!<===)

    1. Time to deal-completion takes 2 quarters

    2. Those two quarters show nice profits

    3. Therefore, the last hurdle for S&P 500 inclusion is passed

    4. TSLA thus added to that gorilla of all Indices and enormous amounts of its shares need be purchased by such index funds

    .....

    And this at a time when the last thing the privatization path needs is for such a quickly-needed forced selling. Yuck.

    Sooooooo....has anyone been deep enough into the weeds to know if an entity can forcibly excuse itself from being entered into this (or other) Index? I’ll be surprised if any Index creator ever contemplated that outcome!
     
    • x 4
    • x 1
    • x 1
    • x 1
    • x 1
  2. Artful Dodger

    Artful Dodger Please, call me "Lodger" Cheers!

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2018
    Messages:
    194
    Location:
    Canada
    #2 Artful Dodger, Aug 12, 2018
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 12, 2018
    No, S&P eligibility requires four (4) succesive quarters showing profits. Might also get excluded on the "majority of shares in public hands" requirement.

    Requirements for S&P 500 listing:

    To qualify for the index, a company must have:
    • a market cap of $5.3 billion
    • its headquarters in the U.S.
    • the value of its market capitalization trade annually
    • at least a quarter-million of its shares trade in each of the previous six months
    • most of its shares in the public’s hands
    • at least half a year since its initial public offering
    • Four straight quarters of positive as-reported earnings.
    Moderator: If you’re going to be brazen enough to “Disagree” with a Moderator’s posting (true enough - It was not a “Mod” post), and try to ‘correct’ that post, then get your facts straight. And now....MOD ON: Read and HEED what I wrote about disseminating half-truths, mis-statements, old wives’ tales and daydreams....and posting them without mentioning this is your opinion only
     
    • Helpful x 2
    • Disagree x 2
    • Informative x 1
  3. MP3Mike

    MP3Mike Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2016
    Messages:
    6,156
    Location:
    Oregon
    This has been discussed repeatedly, and that information is incorrect. You need to go to the source to get real information: https://ca.spindices.com/documents/methodologies/methodology-sp-us-indices.pdf

    Here are the main two differences:
     
    • Informative x 6
    • Like x 2
    • Helpful x 1
    • Love x 1
  4. schonelucht

    schonelucht Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2014
    Messages:
    4,005
    Location:
    Nederland
    #4 schonelucht, Aug 13, 2018
    Last edited: Aug 13, 2018
    And again we have a moderator who feels that they can change someone else's post just because they disagree with the contents. I know it's a thankless job but THIS IS NOT THE WAY TO DO IT. And it's not like this is the first time either. If you disagree with the post, argue it as a non-mod through a reply. If there is a policy that half-truths are not allowed, delete the post (and get cracking because there are hunderds of them in the investor section, some of the most prolofic posters have a majority of their posts in this category).

    Btw, the mentality that someone must be 'brazen' to disagree with a poster that also happens to be a moderator disqualfies you as a moderator. It's that simple. You can be a poster AND a moderator at the same time but you need to STRICTLY seperate the two. Don't use powers that come from being moderator to 'win' an argument as a poster.

    Extra-ordinary times require extra-ordinary measures, so allow me to be so brazen to post some hard guidelines for our moderators.

    1. don't edit posts for content correction, only for policy. Even then, why not just delete it.
    2. if you put up a warning that you are going to be strict with off-topic posts for market action, then don't start posting off topics for market yourself
    3. if you put up a warning that you are going to delete/move certain discussions, DO IT
    4. for the love of god, expand your team.
    5. lock this thread on Saturday and Sunday
    6. public apology to a user who's post you edited
     
    • Like x 8
    • Love x 2
    • Disagree x 1
  5. Artful Dodger

    Artful Dodger Please, call me "Lodger" Cheers!

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2018
    Messages:
    194
    Location:
    Canada
    Moderator: If you’re going to be brazen enough to “Disagree” with a Moderator’s posting (true enough - It was not a “Mod” post), and try to ‘correct’ that post, then get your facts straight. And now....MOD ON: Read and HEED what I wrote about disseminating half-truths, mis-statements, old wives’ tales and daydreams....and posting them without mentioning this is your opinion only

    This is not merely my opinion. It is a direct quote from a reputable source, for which I provided the link to Investopedia.com

    Requirements for S&P 500 listing:

    If you are attempting to educate users, your attitude is not helpful. It feels more like bullying. Apparently Investopedia isn't up to your standards either. Tell me if commenters are allowed to disagree in good faith, or if we need to know in advance what affect comments might have on MODS.

    BTW, you neglected to mention how much profit Tesla would need to earn in Q3 to become net profitable over the last 4 quarters. But since this is the "Market Action" thread, you can MOD this comment too.

    I will not return to this board without an apology.

    Good day.
     
    • Disagree x 3
  6. Mike Smith

    Mike Smith Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2016
    Messages:
    1,019
    Location:
    Toronto
    Sorry Artful Dodger, but you and Investipedia have it wrong. The requirement is profitability in both the most recent quarter and over the last four quarters, not four successive quarters.
     
    • Like x 4
    • Informative x 3
  7. mongo

    mongo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2017
    Messages:
    5,322
    Location:
    Michigan
    As to what that means:
    Which says :
    @AudubonB
    @Artful Dodger Most internet sources get this wrong: actual fund documents attached for reference.

    The two rules related to profit are should be profitable last quarter and sum of last four quarter should be profitable (GAAP). Unless Q3 and Q4 really rock, they won't get positive for the year.

    S&P could add them at any time, but it seems like they would avoid doing so if the private transition were still in play (listing just to delist does not seem to be in their best interest)

    S&P methodology rules attached for reference
     

    Attached Files:

    • Helpful x 3
    • Informative x 3
    • Love x 1
  8. KarenRei

    KarenRei KarenRei KarenRei KarenRei KarenRei KarenRei

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2017
    Messages:
    2,130
    Location:
    Iceland
    #8 KarenRei, Aug 13, 2018
    Last edited: Aug 13, 2018
    Okay, I haven't been part of this conversation (I've been sleeping). I don't even know what is being talked about. But I'm just going to say one thing:

    Threatening to moderate someone - even implicitly - because you disagree with them is totally not okay. "Brazen enough to disagree with a moderator"? You actually think that someone disagreeing with your views is a "brazen" act? Who do you think you are?

    Any mod who talks like this should be automatically disqualified from being a mod.
     
    • Like x 6
    • Disagree x 2
  9. shootformoon

    shootformoon Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2018
    Messages:
    40
    Location:
    universe
    Then there is no way S&P adds it 2019Q1 because FY2018 will be almost unprofitable for sure.
     
    • Disagree x 2
    • Like x 1
  10. SW2Fiddler

    SW2Fiddler It refuels itself. On wind power. While I sleep.

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2014
    Messages:
    1,991
    Location:
    Houston TX
    So, we all good now? We can watch Market Action?
     
    • Funny x 6
    • Like x 1
  11. neroden

    neroden Happy Model S Owner

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2011
    Messages:
    9,338
    Location:
    Ithaca, NY, USA
    S&P 500 inclusion is actually discretionary on the part of the committee. Even if the stock meets all the other criteria, if it's about to be taken private, the S&P committee will not add it.

    Problem solved.
     
    • Like x 4

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Formed in 2006, Tesla Motors Club (TMC) was the first independent online Tesla community. Today it remains the largest and most dynamic community of Tesla enthusiasts. Learn more.
  • Do you value your experience at TMC? Consider becoming a Supporting Member of Tesla Motors Club. As a thank you for your contribution, you'll get nearly no ads in the Community and Groups sections. Additional perks are available depending on the level of contribution. Please visit the Account Upgrades page for more details.


    SUPPORT TMC