-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
Safety Score
- Thread starter ScottNY
- Start date
It's late Friday night/early Saturday morning depending on your time zone. That being said, idk when the cutoff point is. I'd assume a few hours earlier than when the rollout happens
MarcG
Active Member
It’s whenever Elon comes back from a late night of sipping on whiskey and smoking a joint on a podcast interview
None of the alternatives seem to be the case. Everyone says the car takes longer to slow down on a hill. This points to it being a constant force in the direction of travel, regardless, which surprises me. I don't know how they are getting the correct acceleration to bring the car to a stop in a fixed distance from a given speed while on a hill. Stop in 200 feet from 40 mph, for example. If they aren't using the actual change in speed wrt time, the calculation will be wrong.
There is a close relation of wh/mi with safety score. My Wh/mi improved dramatically since I’ve been working on Getting my score to 100. My DM model 3 lifetime average was 265Wh/mi, and I’ve been in the 240 range now lol.And just like the "safety score" your wh/mi is more based on where you drive than how you drive.
But this is the company that refuses to put speed or acceleration in their safety score. What will the efficiency score look like without those?
Even though speed and acceleration are not included, keeping bigger gaps to avoid braking and FCWs means you have to drive slower anyway
I stand corrected, I really thought there’d be more people with a score of 100
Maybe I will do a little more driving tonight to get to 97, but that's as high as I can go by the end of Friday
need close to 400 more miles just to get to 99If the car is hitting the power limit, then wouldn't a hill slow slower, even if it is more kW than when on a flat surface? Wish I had one to just test this out.
Fixed distance on TACC or AP you mean? That would probably be a control loop around distance and speed (to get a target acceleration to get a target regen power via a PID) and can also use the brakes.
AlanSubie4Life
Efficiency Obsessed Member
You mean higher, don’t you? Lower % of non-TeslaFi users likely have 100. So that means more of them participating than (1200-TeslaFi100s)/0.09? Maybe I’m misunderstanding.
n.one.one
Info w/o Drama
For those working to get to a score of 100 by the 10.2 release here is a link to my spreadsheet that can assist you in your planning.
There are full instructions on the sheet as shown on the screenshot below the link. Thanks for the nice comments I've gotten from folks who have used this. Who is going to pull a ~500 miler to get to 100? Good luck and safe driving.
docs.google.com
There are full instructions on the sheet as shown on the screenshot below the link. Thanks for the nice comments I've gotten from folks who have used this. Who is going to pull a ~500 miler to get to 100? Good luck and safe driving.
Tesla Safety Score - Tracking & Planning v10
Safety Score This is set to read only. To make your own sheet go to the file menu, 'Make a Copy' and open in Google Sheets (not in Excel). No share requests please. There are hidden columns with some of the working formulas so be careful what you change or move. <a href="https://teslamotorsclu...
Welp, guess I am out of the running for a while. Was maintaining a 99 with my daily 80 mile round trip commute, but had to go "down below" last weekend into the jungles of the Inland Empire and Mr Az_Rael ended up getting 2 (!) FCWs on the way home. Dropped our score to 97, and haven't been able to dig out of that hole yet.
I debated telling him to reset the car at the time to erase the FCWs, but decided that since we both drive the car regularly, it's probably better to just let it reflect our actual driving habits vs "gaming" anything. Happy husband happy life as they (kinda) say, LOL.
I debated telling him to reset the car at the time to erase the FCWs, but decided that since we both drive the car regularly, it's probably better to just let it reflect our actual driving habits vs "gaming" anything. Happy husband happy life as they (kinda) say, LOL.
AlanSubie4Life
Efficiency Obsessed Member
Going to drive to work today! YOLO! One FCW and I am out!
jebinc
Well-Known Member
Things that can only be said by people that live in flat areas of California.
My Wh/Mi is dominated by temperature first, and where I drove second.
My model X gets about 350 wh/mi in the summer and almost 500 wh/mi in the winter just from the heater, and one drive to the mountains can make it 700 wh/mi.
EVNow
Well-Known Member
That surprises me.
I thought they would do 1k rollout daily for a few days - but monitor closely and stop the rollout if they found issues. Apparently the team wants to monitor the first batch for longer before the next rollout.
boonedocks
MS LR Blk/Blk 19”
There is still another day for Elon to back it off even more.... Don't short Elon
At least Elon admits the current safety score is not an extremely good predictor of crash frequency, and what we have now is "early beta" (oh look, another qualifier to beta). Fascinating that 6B miles of data isn't nearly enough. Wonder how long it will be until they do have to fold in acceleration and speeding (or relative speed to other cars) and people start noticing that the cars Tesla sells are specifically designed and marketed to do unsafe things.
The mind numbing part of this is that Elon himself saying this currently isn't a good predictor won't stop him at all from saying they rolled out FSD only to the "safest" drivers, nor claiming that a driver with a 100 score is better than a driver with a 98 score. That is an interesting actuarial problem, to go and use numbers that you know are false to act upon.
Similar threads
