spdpsba
Active Member
All of them are good points.As others have said, gross cost of company car leases tend to be much higher than personal leases. Lots of reasons given, but there’s also a cost associated with (the risk of) early termination as employers don’t want to carry on paying for your company car if you decide to leave them.
The comparison also only really works on lease v salary sacrifice. My last car which I bought used from Tesla went up in value by nearly 4k when I traded it in, and my current MY is almost certainly worth more than I paid for it. That’s unusual for sure, not everyone can buy the car outright, but residuals are bonkers on all cars at the moment but it’s not been reflected in the lease prices.
People who do highish company miles can also be stung. A salary sacrifice is just a way to fund a company car. It’s a company car so a small BIK charge applies, but the potential kill is the approved mileage rate for fuel which is 5p. It does depend on expenses policies, but on 10k miles it could be the difference between £500 (5p a mile) and £4500 (45p a mile) in tax free payments to the employee towards fuel and running costs. As an employer, you might quite like not paying that extra £4k. I say it depends on expenses policies because some stick to government rates while others, especially those who own the company, claim actual charging costs etc, but as an employee it’s something to check. I had my first Tesla back in 2015 and at that time the approved rate was 0p a mile, I couldn’t claim anything off my employer, thankfully free supercharging saved that one.
So my tips would be..if they’re not stating the obvious:
Work out the total cost for the car you’d run outside the company car scheme including how funded, insurance, tyres, depreciation, fuel although that might be the same if you’re just comparing a company Tesla to a privately owned one, and deduct company mileage payments if you do many company miles.
Do the same for the company car and work out net cost after tax savings, but be mindful of other consequential changes like pension, death in service benefits etc.
See if the difference makes it worth doing. It’s not a given that it will be in all cases.
I haven’t done any methodical analysis but back of the envelope calculation and man maths make me think the NHS SS isn’t cost effective - I have more exposure to this than the other SS.
Even if we get £4500 in tax free payments towards mileage (average of 10000miles) it will add up to £13500 for 3 years as savings. Personal lease for a 3 year will cost around £18000. NHS lease will cost around £12500, so there is a £5500 difference + 13500 = £19000 as potential saving if we go for it.
But when you calculate the real loss in pension NHS SS will calculate around 750 monthly as the lease cost (before tax deduction, so the lease cost after tax will be around 350-400 = £12500) and it will work out £9000/year and £27000 for 3 years. If you are a high rate tax payer and losing £9000 from gross will reduce your pension pot atleast around £2000/year (including employer contribution) and in 3 years you lose £6000. Now the NHS pension is calculated based on average of all the remaining years (not like the previous ones after change int he law). So this loss of minimum £6000 will have a negative impact throughout the rest of the period. I think the worst bit is if you do it just for 3 years may be you will gain £10000 or something based on my rough calculation but people do not stop with that they go for lease cars every 3 years and that will have a terrible impact as we do not calculate what the £10000 can buy in 20 years time instead of investing in pensions. But if you are prudent and also invest extra in some private pensions then you can make a good amount of money using SS.
But not sure people really do that.