I'm dying to read the peer-reviewed article (from my "anti-science bubble"). What exactly are your qualifications? Did you actually read the latest IPCC report (including the scientific portion) and follow the links to the background articles? No? Then I'd posit that it's not "our inability" that prevents you to find evidence and to understand it, but your incompetence (which is, by the way, not an insult: not many people are competent climate scientists, and the people I respect have dedicated decades of their lives to become competent, something you can't ask from everyone -- and we need a lot of people on this earth who are not climate scientists too). Although in your case I think the ignorance is actually willful (but that's opinion, not fact), and then we don't even need to talk about competence.