I have a little OTA fatigue. In part it is due to general software dev that proceeds along the lines of two steps forward and one step backward, but most specifically I'm ready to find a version that has vampire losses under control and stick with that for a while until a future stable version comes out with nice improvements that does not worsen vampire losses again. I also find that the updates take a fair drain of energy, on the order of 0.5 kWh and sometimes more.
Which brings me to my question: are updates necessarily sequential ? By that I mean will skipped updates be applied first when I choose a future version ?
Which brings me to my question: are updates necessarily sequential ? By that I mean will skipped updates be applied first when I choose a future version ?