Definitely not NASA (or space wings). My brain would quickly receive an icepick as a result of their conservatism and glacial pace.
But yes, I've been designing/building/testing/managing/acquiring commercial satellites for 20+ years. Participation here is a bit tough since I can only say like 10% of the things I want to say.
Somewhat in context to the above convo, back when I used to do real work I've banged my head more than I care to admit on the
range safety compliance matrix. This is the set of safety items that everyone must comply to (launchers, satellites, contractors, etc.), and if that doesn't actually look like a matrix to you, well spotted. Also, if you can't find any concise instructions on how to actually engineer your way through the compliance evaluation process, you're still batting 1000. As it turns out our very efficient range safety analysis process has each user translate the articles within that document into a DIY excel file (or at least, that's what I've always seen) and then add some columns in which they confirm compliance and/or justify deviation from the
very obvious intent of each article.
Of course, somehow, magically, a range safety officer that's been reviewing these for decades [in dark corners of old buildings] goes through each item and will grill you on your compliances and deviation justifications and will actually nail it all. Many many months later (and I can imagine for something like SLS, years later), approval to operate is granted.