TMC is an independent, primarily volunteer organization that relies on ad revenue to cover its operating costs. Please consider whitelisting TMC on your ad blocker and becoming a Supporting Member. For more info: Support TMC
  1. TMC is currently READ ONLY.
    Click here for more info.

SLS - On the Scent of Inevitable Capitulation

Discussion in 'SpaceX' started by Nikxice, Nov 18, 2018.

  1. Yggdrasill

    Yggdrasill Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2012
    Messages:
    4,107
    Location:
    Kongsberg, Norway
    Anyone really know what the Orion capsule does differently from Dragon 2? Seems like it's roughly the same size.

    Is there any reason (besides political) why you couldn't simply adapt the Orion service module to be compatible with the Dragon 2? Then you could launch a service module on a Falcon Heavy and a Dragon 2 on a Falcon 9, have Dragon dock with the service module in LEO, and then do a lunar mission. If you need more delta-V, it should be possible to strech the service module for more fuel.

    But I *think* the upper stage on the falcon heavy would have sufficient fuel for a lunar mission. Basically all you would have to do is replace the Orion crew casule with a docking port, and maybe some small changes on the Dragon 2. Or am I missing something?
     
  2. e-FTW

    e-FTW New electron smell

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2015
    Messages:
    3,216
    Location:
    San Francisco, CA
    The EM-1 mission we are talking about is unmanned. So no need to have FH go through “human-rating” which is why this could work on FH.
     
  3. e-FTW

    e-FTW New electron smell

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2015
    Messages:
    3,216
    Location:
    San Francisco, CA
    “IT BEGINS”: Industry and lawmakers go to defense of SLS - SpaceNews.com — SpaceNews

    So they call themselves, rather self-importantly “The Coalition for Deep Space Exploration”.
    Described as “an industry group whose members include companies involved in development of both SLS and Orion”. So lobbyists.

    They are attacking this new plan mainly on the fact it would require “multiple launches” and how that is riskier. Of course it is! It is pure math! If there is a 1% (random number, bear with me, this won’t take long) chance of failure per launch, then two launches leads to a total of, wait for it... 2% chance of mission failure. So they are correct. But it is a pretty weak argument, they really seem to be grasping at straws here.
     
    • Informative x 1
  4. Yggdrasill

    Yggdrasill Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2012
    Messages:
    4,107
    Location:
    Kongsberg, Norway
    Ah, right, forgot that. But if EM-1 is done commercially, I think chances are good SLS is SOL for the remainder of the launches.
     
    • Like x 1
  5. Yggdrasill

    Yggdrasill Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2012
    Messages:
    4,107
    Location:
    Kongsberg, Norway
    Definitely. For one thing, the consequence of a failure would be approximately halved. If the first launch fails, you simply hold off on the second launch. If the second launch fails, you may still have time to prep a repeat before the payload of the first launch degrades in any way.

    Another thing is that SLS isn't very extensively tested. It may have a failure rate of 5%, while the commercial options might have a failure rate of 1%. So going commercial may reduce risk.
     
    • Like x 3
  6. e-FTW

    e-FTW New electron smell

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2015
    Messages:
    3,216
    Location:
    San Francisco, CA
    • Informative x 1
  7. adiggs

    adiggs Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2012
    Messages:
    4,172
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    You also get disparity in costs, even if the risks are the same, leading to different results.

    So if chance of failure is 1% (I'm making up all of these numbers to illustrate an idea, not to make any particular claim about reality) and SLS costs $1B for a launch, while a comparable SpaceX launch has a 1% chance of failure and costs $100M and needs 2 launches to do the same work, even if SpaceX needs 3 launches to get the 2 units of work complete that equals 1 unit of SLS work, you're still to the good by $700M relative to that 1 SLS launch.

    Successes and failures aren't equally expensive in other words.

    When one option is enough cheaper, and enough faster, it really doesn't leave any oxygen in the room for the slower and more expensive option :)
     
    • Informative x 1
  8. Grendal

    Grendal SpaceX Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2012
    Messages:
    5,661
    Location:
    Santa Fe, New Mexico
    Scott Manley avoids the politics but discusses the possibility of EM-1 on something other than SLS.
     
    • Like x 3
  9. e-FTW

    e-FTW New electron smell

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2015
    Messages:
    3,216
    Location:
    San Francisco, CA
    Scott Manley, in written form:
    SLS Rocket Promises To Do Better - Universe Today — Universe Today

    Maybe SLS morphs into some other program. Again.
     
  10. Nikxice

    Nikxice Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2014
    Messages:
    1,054
    Location:
    Hudson, NH
    Bridenstine's recent recommendation to use commercial boosters to launch EM-1 clearly has some folks panties in a wad. He's likely frustrated and doesn't want to be the next NASA caretaker muddling through another decade overseeing a porked out moonshot plan. Perhaps his call is just designed to light a fire under contractors like Boeing. Even after reading Bridenstine's 3 soothing reasons in the "Workforce" letter above, supporters of SLS should still be concerned. Take point #2, noting the complexity and risk of docking in LEO. LOL! He knows that's routine stuff and Boeing knows it too. Uphill battle, but hope he gets the support he'll need to follow through with using commercial boosters for Orion and the upper stage.

    Love the hokey name of the lobby backing the earthbound SLS. “The Coalition for Deep Space Exploration”. Aka in political backrooms and corporate boardrooms, "The Coalition for Dealing Spending Entitlements".
     
    • Like x 2
  11. Bobfitz1

    Bobfitz1 Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2012
    Messages:
    1,160
    Location:
    Ludlow, Vt
    I haven't seen anything SpaceX has put out the past six months to suggest their Starship redesign and moving fast forward with Starhopper might improve earlier estimates of when Yusaku Maezawa and his selected artists will orbit the moon.
    One more major delay of SLS/Orion and it's timeline for orbital mission will be in same year (potentially) as Starships.
    Jim Bridenstine seems like a sharp guy. Having SpaceX get Orion to orbit the moon might be good insurance against Orion/SLS being left in the dust by the artists. This is rank speculation, but the past 6 months strike me as confirming Elon's desire to get Starship fully operational as soon as humanly possible. He's been willing to stand the original design on it's head to move faster and better.

    "A Japanese billionaire and a coterie of artists will visit the moon as early as 2023, becoming the first private citizens ever to fly beyond low Earth orbit, SpaceX CEO Elon Musk announced tonight. "
     
  12. e-FTW

    e-FTW New electron smell

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2015
    Messages:
    3,216
    Location:
    San Francisco, CA
    So Orion on top of Super Heavy?
     
  13. Bobfitz1

    Bobfitz1 Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2012
    Messages:
    1,160
    Location:
    Ludlow, Vt
    I suppose that Orion and it's service module launched by Super Heavy might be another option open to NASA.
    What I was suggesting was that the same 2 launch option under consideration for the Orion unscrewed lunar mission,
    be used as well for the 2022 crewed lunar mission.
    Since if further SLS delays push that crewed mission into 2023, and Starship/Superheavy is ready for the Maezawa
    lunar mission earlier than estimated a year ago, NASA Orion/SLS could be upstaged the same as Boeing is being upstaged
    by SpaceX Commercial Crew. If Starship can take people to the moon and thereafter Mars, why does NASA need Orion?
    A related and larger question is how long lived is a close alliance with NASA if continuing it will slow down Musk's Mars plans?
     
    • Like x 2
  14. e-FTW

    e-FTW New electron smell

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2015
    Messages:
    3,216
    Location:
    San Francisco, CA
  15. e-FTW

    e-FTW New electron smell

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2015
    Messages:
    3,216
    Location:
    San Francisco, CA
    A really good read on everything that has happened in the last few weeks around SLS: https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/03/22/nasa-rocket-becomes-boeings-latest-headache-trump-demands-moon-mission/

    And a quote, because you really should read the whole thing. This explains many things, but also sets up quite the showdown between the current administration and the senators keeping SLS going for parochial reasons:
    Ok, one more:
    I wish I was that punny...
     
    • Informative x 2
  16. ecarfan

    ecarfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2013
    Messages:
    19,181
    Location:
    San Mateo, CA
    That is the way government space has always been done. It’s the only way to build support in Congress for approving the money.

    “Construction of the rocket and the Orion spacecraft is spread out so that every state has jobs connected to the program. In all, SLS supports about 25,000 jobs nationwide, with a total economic impact of $4.7 billion, according to NASA.

    That has helped the rocket win support among members of Congress, but also has fueled critics who have dubbed it the “Senate LaunchSystem.” In addition to primary contractor Boeing, key contractors are Aerojet Rocketdyne, Northrop Grumman and the United Launch Alliance.”
     
  17. e-FTW

    e-FTW New electron smell

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2015
    Messages:
    3,216
    Location:
    San Francisco, CA
  18. e-FTW

    e-FTW New electron smell

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2015
    Messages:
    3,216
    Location:
    San Francisco, CA
  19. e-FTW

    e-FTW New electron smell

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2015
    Messages:
    3,216
    Location:
    San Francisco, CA
    An Alabama representative just let the cat out of the bag with the SLS rocket

    That, right there is why the system is pretty broken at times: No one cares about doing great things for the country and humanity, or cares about what our Federal tax dollars actually do. All that matters is each representative’s backyard.
     
    • Like x 3
  20. ecarfan

    ecarfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2013
    Messages:
    19,181
    Location:
    San Mateo, CA
    From that article, a statement by Alabama Rep. Alderholt, quote: “Can you talk about the importance of our national space programs, such as the capabilities, the supplier base, the innovation of SLS, the Orion benefit on a broad range of aerospace industry users?" Aderholt asked.”

    Well one thing that Bridenstine can’t talk about is “the innovation of SLS”. ;) As for Pence, it really doesn’t matter what he says, he’s an empty suit who has no influence on Congress and it will vote in its own self-interest, as usual.

    @e-FTW even back in the Apollo days the situation was the same: contracts were spread across many Congressional districts to ensure that Congressional funding would be secure. The difference then was that political leaders and the public were caught up in the Cold War and the “race to the moon” with the Russians. Now, the vast majority of the general public has little to no interest in exploring space.

    Fortunately, we have a couple of billionaires who are passionate about it, understand the challenges, and are working to solve them. I think they can accomplish their objectives without relying entirely on government support. Of course SpaceX and BO should seek out and take government contracts if they are available. But Bezos has his own money, and Elon is pretty good at figuring out where to find money since he doesn’t have Jeff’s deep pockets.
     
    • Like x 3

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Formed in 2006, Tesla Motors Club (TMC) was the first independent online Tesla community. Today it remains the largest and most dynamic community of Tesla enthusiasts. Learn more.
  • Do you value your experience at TMC? Consider becoming a Supporting Member of Tesla Motors Club. As a thank you for your contribution, you'll get nearly no ads in the Community and Groups sections. Additional perks are available depending on the level of contribution. Please visit the Account Upgrades page for more details.


    SUPPORT TMC