jdcollins5
Member
can you post what the readout looks like for the battery capacity, nominal full pack etc?
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
can you post what the readout looks like for the battery capacity, nominal full pack etc?
I believe this version is from the same developer as SMT using Android. Is that correct? But the format seems totally different and the charts seem messy and difficult to read with everything mixed in there.Just got my adaptor in. Here is my P3d+ 8/2018 build, 22.7k miles, 310 wh/mile lifetime. Range just recently dropped 10miles within the past month.
View attachment 541109
I believe this version is from the same developer as SMT using Android. Is that correct? But the format seems totally different and the charts seem messy and difficult to read with everything mixed in there.
Do you know if the data can be listed in a table format like the original SMT readouts?
Just installed SMT. Thought I'd share the data here of the results:
Car 1 (Tesla model 3 LR DM, dec 2019 delivered):
Nominal full pack 76.3 kWh
ODO: 7994 km (sorry for the metrics here )
Always charge to 60-70%. Only higher when on vacation (winter trips to the Alpes)
Car 2 (Tesla model S 75D, dec 2018 delivered):
Nominal full pack 68.5 kWh
ODO: 37186 km
My girlfriend charges this car to 90% every day (not a care in the world). I would have expected this one to be higher, more in the low 70's. Something to keep monitoring.
Looks like my M3 is in good shape. So I'm at least 50% happy
Wondering how SMT is deciding 77.8kWh is the max
77.8 is read from the car, recently discovered signal and only for Model 3. It seems like a hard coded value (for that battery size), so we'll see how useful this is, if it just creates panic among owners I might remove it later. But it makes the scale look sooo useful, right?
Model 3 has a signal that we recently discovered, that reports the 'new' full pack capacity. Not sure how accurate it is yet, it seems to be a hard-coded number equal for all cars (of the same battery type), as we know the battery and BMS 'settles in' a bit the first few weeks of ownership, and then start reflecting the actual capacity. I am worried that the degradation numbers will show too much degradation with this method, I hope people don't freak out and go bananas. As they usually do when they realize their current battery capacity. If it causes too much drama, I will remove it.
I should also give something to the S and X guys, those cars don't report this number (that we have found). I thought something as silly as they having to enter that number manually. That way, I don't have the impossible task of combing the whole internet to try to find all the different Nominal numbers from the different batteries, trying to auto-detect which battery each person has, and end up in a crossfire of lawsuits when people go bananas and sue Tesla for the (potentially wrong) numbers I put there I don't want to give people that ammunition, and if I do, I must be 100% sure it's correct, and aligned with the numbers Tesla see themselves. Which is why I'm slightly worried about this feature. We'll see how it goes
I had the same question for the developer of SMT, and he said this (source: #583)
Thanks. That makes sense. It’s roughly the value we would expect, of course, based on prior discussions and posts. I asked him whether it is the same for 2018/2019 as it is for 2020.
My M3P is an March-2019 build and reports 77.8kWh as well, so it sounds like it hasn't changed. I think the question might best be posed to a sample of 2018, 2019 and 2020 owners who have the long-range battery and run SMT with the latest version, since the value isn't hard-coded by the developer, but reported by the car via CAN bus.
Thanks. Yeah. Not really surprised at this either way. Batteries always seemed to start near 78kWh based on what I have seen, even for older vehicles.
Any suggestions what someone like myself with a 9/18 P3 build with 100% only registering 282 rated miles should do?
Local Tesla service center assures me 282 is lower than 310 because of my driving habits, which I know is bogus.
Any suggestions what someone like myself with a 9/18 P3 build with 100% only registering 282 rated miles should do?
Local Tesla service center assures me 282 is lower than 310 because of my driving habits, which I know is bogus.
This is normal. I know someone with a 8/18 build with 280 miles.
There is nothing you can do about it. Quite a few anecdotal reports of batteries in that timeframe (August/Sept) being worse.
I have an October build and it is at 300. Also normal.
It likely makes no difference except on road trips, of course.
You are of course right that it has nothing to do with driving habits. It a measure of energy - has nothing to do with how you have been driving.
im at 279 which was a pretty big drop the past month....nothing we can do until get closer to 217.
Would it be 70% based on 310 or the new 322 figure quoted?
I have Dec 2019 build P3D 2700mi, 76.6 kw remaining
View attachment 542475
So when charged to 90% or so, it predicts about 318-319 miles at 100%, right? (Assuming 18" wheel selection) If 20", presumably about 295 at 100%?
Yes, 319 now. It was briefly 322 when car was brand new.
View attachment 537369
I don’t have the HW to access CAN bus data in my M3. Not even sure I’ll get it, so I may be somewhat off-topic in this thread. I hope you will forbear. This thread seems to be a group with better understanding of the issue than my own. I’d like your opinions if this 100% SOC chart from my 2018 M3 looks to you like Tesla capped my Vmax. The beginning of the drop @ about 12,500 ODO miles corresponds fairly well with the .16.1 SW upgrade. Looks to me that it’s stabilized at abt 297-298 miles & may even be recovering a little bit. TIA.