Thats right, I forgot that. Thanks for the correction.
Tesla would have to wait till the tesla vision (no radar) version is certified for those features. I seem to remember that they have to go through re certification for that for the non radar version, but it has not "failed testing" or anything yet even though those features are not certified for tesla vision cars yet.
If tesla vision doesnt pass for those features,. then tesla has a real problem.
They should have gotten them certified prior to launching Vision, if it was as safe or safer.
Makes those whom are prone to questioning actions from "people who've seen the data," question a lot of things.
If it was 100% ready to go, passed all non-Tesla Safety Agency authorities, passed with flying colors and scored the highest safety ratings, even above a Model 3 and Y... that would be one thing.
It didnt. Those non-Tesla Safety Agencies downgraded it, because it hadnt been tested. Tesla itself neutured several safety features to push Vision, with a promise it'll get better... we just need more data! Question everything, especial if its a car full of your less tech savvy family that had a working radar that stopped the car in time vs one that didnt have a radar, or one that was deactivated without notifying the drivers. The car won't behave the same between Vision and Radar equipped.
If Tesla was smart, they'd just let consumers decide to upgrade to the next model year... heck, if its a million times better and can toast bread, make it a paid upgrade like FSD or speed boost.
I foresee many lawsuits when real world data crashes don't match internal Tesla data.