Moderator note: Moved two posts to snippiness. Debate and criticism is fine, even encouraged. Profane language and attacking other members of TMC is against forum rules and will lead to a ban.
Bruce.
Then you should have moved Modadel's post because it was not on topic, and an unprovoked attack on me. Just because I called a spade a spade you moved my post? Please consider what choices you made. His statement about how I "do not like anything Tesla" is an attack when posted in a very "Pro-Tesla Community." And it was incorrect to put it mildly. All Modadel did was read my last ten posts, and since most of those were my defending my decision to not Get the Tesla Powerwall/Solarglass System installed because it is a bad decision when based on the financial numbers. As well as how Tesla bases the advantage of their system over an extremely lengthy time period in which there WILL be huge advancements which will likely make this system obsolete and a negative instead of a positive. AND it is unproven as well.
So I discussed in ONE thread why it is not prudent for someone that strongly considered the Tesla Roof and Powerwalls (me) based on Elon's statement that it would be a good fit for those that were replacing their roofs and were going to go solar.
I have not been negative about any other product nor the tesla powerwall or the solarglass roof in any other thread. AND i have been EXTREMELY positive about the Cyber. To the point of discussing the myriad of advantages and ways a Cyber could change my life, and the hotel and airline models, as well as provide a good "base" for me to build my Tiny Home off the grid out in the woods. So Modadel in fact was lazy and/or deceitful in attempting to discredit my decision.
YOU should question people that for no reason decide they are going to talk negatively about another member, especially when what they post about that person is untrue.
And you didn't. You saw I called him what he is AFTER he started talking of me on a personal level in a public forum with misinformation.
If anyone should be censored it is that member for his immature ACTION. I hope you recognise/investigate what he did, and then how you compounded it. I do not come here to be attacked, nor talked about. I would not do that to another person unless they senseless and immaturely are allowed, by you, to post untruths about me. If you did your job correctly you would have not removed my post for saying "Snippy" words to the "snippiness" section without also removing his post.
I was taught that words are just words. He made a thinly-disguised, unwarranted, and unprovoked attack on me that was immature and a lie. And you as a moderator should have enough sense to recognise when a member is NOT discussing the topic, and instead starts bad-mouthing another member.
And you should have either removed both of our posts. Mine because I was colorful in exposing the member for his childish, baseless attack. And me because...what I used some words?
His actions warranted your intervention. He should have been censored and censured for doing what he did. But you were incapable of seeing his action for what it was, or you are only capable of identifying words that mommy finds unsettling.
Actions or words? Which should be monitored?
Had he posted about the subject, and not started incorrectly trying to make me out to be anto-Tesla when it is obvious I am not is what you should be watching for. And not if someone calls someone out after they are themselves incorrectly and negatively attacked.
