TMC is an independent, primarily volunteer organization that relies on ad revenue to cover its operating costs. Please consider whitelisting TMC on your ad blocker and becoming a Supporting Member. For more info: Support TMC
  1. TMC is currently READ ONLY.
    Click here for more info.

SpaceX F9 - GPS 3 SV04 - SLC-40

Discussion in 'SpaceX' started by Grendal, Aug 19, 2020.

  1. Grendal

    Grendal SpaceX Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2012
    Messages:
    5,661
    Location:
    Santa Fe, New Mexico
    #1 Grendal, Aug 19, 2020
    Last edited: Nov 5, 2020
    Launch Date: November 5
    Launch Window: 2324-2339 GMT (6:24-6:39 p.m. EST)
    Launch Site: SLC-40, Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Florida
    Booster Recovery: ASDS - OCISLY
    Booster: B1062.1
    Mass: 3,880 kg (8,553 lb)
    Orbit: Semi-synchronous MEO

    A SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket will launch the U.S. Air Force’s fourth third-generation navigation satellite for the Global Positioning System. The satellite is built by Lockheed Martin.

    GPS Block III - Wikipedia
     
  2. e-FTW

    e-FTW New electron smell

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2015
    Messages:
    3,216
    Location:
    San Francisco, CA
    A shiny new booster! How quaint! ;-)
     
    • Like x 1
    • Funny x 1
  3. ecarfan

    ecarfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2013
    Messages:
    19,181
    Location:
    San Mateo, CA
    You mean the Air Force wants to use an “untested” rocket that has never been off the ground before? That’s crazy! :eek:

    Personally I will only fly on “flight-proven” vehicles.
     
    • Like x 4
    • Love x 2
    • Funny x 1
  4. Grendal

    Grendal SpaceX Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2012
    Messages:
    5,661
    Location:
    Santa Fe, New Mexico
    First post updated. Going a day earlier.
     
  5. ecarfan

    ecarfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2013
    Messages:
    19,181
    Location:
    San Mateo, CA
    This SLC-40 launch will be just two days after Starlink 12 launches from SLC-40?
     
    • Like x 1
  6. Grendal

    Grendal SpaceX Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2012
    Messages:
    5,661
    Location:
    Santa Fe, New Mexico
    #6 Grendal, Sep 24, 2020
    Last edited: Sep 24, 2020
    Nice spot! It looks like Starlink 12 moved to LC-39A for its launch. That post has been updated. It's good that SpaceX has two launch pads at the Cape.

    It makes sense that this one happens on the military base while Starlink launches from the civilian launch site.

    It's also good they've got two ASDS's for recovery because they are needed for both of these launches. I wonder which one will get which? I'll post when I know.
     
  7. Grendal

    Grendal SpaceX Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2012
    Messages:
    5,661
    Location:
    Santa Fe, New Mexico
    New booster's static fire was successful.

    SpaceX twitter:
    Static fire test complete – targeting Tuesday, September 29 for Falcon 9's launch of the GPS III Space Vehicle 04 mission
     
  8. Cosmacelf

    Cosmacelf Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2013
    Messages:
    8,229
    Location:
    San Diego
    I think this is the next SpaceX launch now. Targeting tomorrow Oct. 2nd?
     
    • Like x 1
  9. Grendal

    Grendal SpaceX Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2012
    Messages:
    5,661
    Location:
    Santa Fe, New Mexico
    Yes. Updated.
     
  10. Grendal

    Grendal SpaceX Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2012
    Messages:
    5,661
    Location:
    Santa Fe, New Mexico
  11. Nikxice

    Nikxice Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2014
    Messages:
    1,054
    Location:
    Hudson, NH
    Scrubbed. Looks like a computer initiated abort at T minus 2 seconds. Possibly more information will be coming soon from the launch director.
     
  12. Pricee2

    Pricee2 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2013
    Messages:
    365
    Location:
    Snohomish WA USA
    This makes it way more exciting, but less desirable, than a nominal launch.
     
  13. Grendal

    Grendal SpaceX Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2012
    Messages:
    5,661
    Location:
    Santa Fe, New Mexico
    The weather is terrible tomorrow. So only a 20% chance of tomorrow happening. That's what is scheduled for now though.
     
  14. ecarfan

    ecarfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2013
    Messages:
    19,181
    Location:
    San Mateo, CA
    This appears to be why the launch scrubbed.

    3AB66B10-A2EE-4ABA-8193-59C1A4AE36B8.jpeg
     
    • Informative x 1
  15. Electroman

    Electroman Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2012
    Messages:
    6,104
    Location:
    TX
    Looks like Elon is not too pleased with these system malfunction induced aborts. Understandably. These Falcon 9s have flown many times, I guess 100 or more, so this should go like clockwork barring any weather related delays.
     
  16. e-FTW

    e-FTW New electron smell

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2015
    Messages:
    3,216
    Location:
    San Francisco, CA
  17. Grendal

    Grendal SpaceX Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2012
    Messages:
    5,661
    Location:
    Santa Fe, New Mexico
    Turbopump issues dealt with. First post has the new date and time.
     
  18. Cosmacelf

    Cosmacelf Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2013
    Messages:
    8,229
    Location:
    San Diego
    Anyone know what happened?
     
    • Like x 1
  19. Grendal

    Grendal SpaceX Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2012
    Messages:
    5,661
    Location:
    Santa Fe, New Mexico
    We'll probably get details tomorrow during the Crew 1 briefing. Something in certain engines was causing an overpressure event. Two were exchanged in B1062 and one was exchanged in B1061. Supposedly this wasn't terribly bad and seen before but the NRO and NASA are being especially sensitive and cautious with their important payloads. :)
     
    • Like x 2
  20. Grendal

    Grendal SpaceX Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2012
    Messages:
    5,661
    Location:
    Santa Fe, New Mexico
    It was gunk in a few engines:
    They were able to replicate the failure on McGregor. A relief valve on the gas generator was slightly blocked by some substance and made it start earlier than expected. The substance is one used during production and was not properly retired. Once retired the engine worked perfectly normal and was ready to go. They, out of extra precaution, replaced two engines on Crew 1.
     
    • Informative x 1

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Formed in 2006, Tesla Motors Club (TMC) was the first independent online Tesla community. Today it remains the largest and most dynamic community of Tesla enthusiasts. Learn more.
  • Do you value your experience at TMC? Consider becoming a Supporting Member of Tesla Motors Club. As a thank you for your contribution, you'll get nearly no ads in the Community and Groups sections. Additional perks are available depending on the level of contribution. Please visit the Account Upgrades page for more details.


    SUPPORT TMC