Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register
  • We just completed a significant update, but we still have some fixes and adjustments to make, so please bear with us for the time being. Cheers!

SpaceX F9 - GPS 3 SV04 - SLC-40

Grendal

SpaceX Moderator
Jan 31, 2012
5,683
6,836
Santa Fe, New Mexico
Launch Date: November 5
Launch Window: 2324-2339 GMT (6:24-6:39 p.m. EST)
Launch Site: SLC-40, Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Florida
Booster Recovery: ASDS - OCISLY
Booster: B1062.1
Mass: 3,880 kg (8,553 lb)
Orbit: Semi-synchronous MEO

A SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket will launch the U.S. Air Force’s fourth third-generation navigation satellite for the Global Positioning System. The satellite is built by Lockheed Martin.

GPS Block III - Wikipedia
 
Last edited:

Grendal

SpaceX Moderator
Jan 31, 2012
5,683
6,836
Santa Fe, New Mexico
This SLC-40 launch will be just two days after Starlink 12 launches from SLC-40?

Nice spot! It looks like Starlink 12 moved to LC-39A for its launch. That post has been updated. It's good that SpaceX has two launch pads at the Cape.

It makes sense that this one happens on the military base while Starlink launches from the civilian launch site.

It's also good they've got two ASDS's for recovery because they are needed for both of these launches. I wonder which one will get which? I'll post when I know.
 
Last edited:

Grendal

SpaceX Moderator
Jan 31, 2012
5,683
6,836
Santa Fe, New Mexico
New booster's static fire was successful.

SpaceX twitter:
Static fire test complete – targeting Tuesday, September 29 for Falcon 9's launch of the GPS III Space Vehicle 04 mission
 

Nikxice

Active Member
Oct 31, 2014
1,056
1,769
Hudson, NH
Scrubbed. Looks like a computer initiated abort at T minus 2 seconds. Possibly more information will be coming soon from the launch director.
 

ecarfan

Well-Known Member
Sep 21, 2013
19,186
13,841
San Mateo, CA
This appears to be why the launch scrubbed.

3AB66B10-A2EE-4ABA-8193-59C1A4AE36B8.jpeg
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Grendal

Electroman

Supporting Member
Aug 18, 2012
6,114
6,167
TX
Looks like Elon is not too pleased with these system malfunction induced aborts. Understandably. These Falcon 9s have flown many times, I guess 100 or more, so this should go like clockwork barring any weather related delays.
 

Grendal

SpaceX Moderator
Jan 31, 2012
5,683
6,836
Santa Fe, New Mexico
Anyone know what happened?
We'll probably get details tomorrow during the Crew 1 briefing. Something in certain engines was causing an overpressure event. Two were exchanged in B1062 and one was exchanged in B1061. Supposedly this wasn't terribly bad and seen before but the NRO and NASA are being especially sensitive and cautious with their important payloads. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: e-FTW and Cosmacelf

Grendal

SpaceX Moderator
Jan 31, 2012
5,683
6,836
Santa Fe, New Mexico
It was gunk in a few engines:
They were able to replicate the failure on McGregor. A relief valve on the gas generator was slightly blocked by some substance and made it start earlier than expected. The substance is one used during production and was not properly retired. Once retired the engine worked perfectly normal and was ready to go. They, out of extra precaution, replaced two engines on Crew 1.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: e-FTW

About Us

Formed in 2006, Tesla Motors Club (TMC) was the first independent online Tesla community. Today it remains the largest and most dynamic community of Tesla enthusiasts. Learn more.

Do you value your experience at TMC? Consider becoming a Supporting Member of Tesla Motors Club. As a thank you for your contribution, you'll get nearly no ads in the Community and Groups sections. Additional perks are available depending on the level of contribution. Please visit the Account Upgrades page for more details.


SUPPORT TMC
Top