You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The reason for two burns of the second stage is to get the payload into GTO (Geosynchronous Transfer Orbit). Basically the first burn gives it enough velocity to orbit down low, then the second burn makes the orbit very elliptical. The payload then uses its own thrust near the top of the ellipse to circularize the orbit again. For Low Earth Orbit (LEO) there is never a need for a second burn.Yeah, this all happened very quickly, no break needed in the webcast. Probably has to do with the target orbit *hand waving*...
2nd stage was one long burn instead of the usual two.
The reason for two burns of the second stage is to get the payload into GTO (Geosynchronous Transfer Orbit). Basically the first burn gives it enough velocity to orbit down low, then the second burn makes the orbit very elliptical. The payload then uses its own thrust near the top of the ellipse to circularize the orbit again. For Low Earth Orbit (LEO) there is never a need for a second burn.
So the aluminum fins are throw away? And the Titanium ones are reusable?
I noticed while I was watching the webcast that the second stage changed its azimuth (??) near the end of the burn. You could see the horizon changing on one of the camera angles. I assumed at the time that with the single burn that they were already near the altitude they needed but needed some more velocity. I did not check to see if the rate of altitude increase was reduced at that point because I was more interested in the landing.Not exactly. The minimum energy orbital insertion is still similar to a Hohmann transfer orbit with a short secondary burn at altitude. The Space Shuttle did this routinely using the OMS to circularize. This had the added bonus that the external tank was still in the transfer orbit which was designed to target it for re-entry in a benign location in the South Pacific.
If you have some fuel to throw away, you can loft the trajectory above the optimum Hohmann angle, arriving at the desired orbital altitude quickly while still thrusting towards orbital velocity, then cancel the excess vertical velocity by vectoring slightly down for the last few seconds of orbital insertion.
Needless to say, they had plenty of extra delta-v to squander considering that their payload was a 1000 lb satellite.
Yes, I agree. By setting that very difficult to achieve goal, Elon accelerates the timeframe for making the F9 rapidly reusable. And what SpaceX learns in that process will be applied to future rockets like the BFR. Rapid reusability also lowers costs to orbit by reducing the time and resources necessary to relaunch a rocket.Fundamentally, I don't see the 24 hour turnaround as something that SpaceX intends to do as an action but more as a design goal. I expect that SpaceX will have a good backlog of recovered Block 5 boosters pretty quick just like they have a significant number of block 3 and 4 recovered boosters now. Once they have a dozen of those and maybe two full Falcon Heavies in their "stable" will be when the company will need to lessen their manufacturing pace. However, by the time that happens then I can see those people working on the mini BFR.
I get to keep it, it pretty much just allow us to get into the chalet for the food and drink, other than not nothing special.Kengchang nice. Is that a badge they gave out? If so did you get to keep or have to hand back? Any photos of the launch to show? Wondering what your perspective was from there.