TMC is an independent, primarily volunteer organization that relies on ad revenue to cover its operating costs. Please consider whitelisting TMC on your ad blocker and becoming a Supporting Member. For more info: Support TMC
  1. TMC is currently READ ONLY.
    Click here for more info.

SpaceX Internet Satellite Network: Starlink

Discussion in 'SpaceX' started by Grendal, Nov 8, 2014.

  1. Todd Burch

    Todd Burch Voltage makes me tingle.

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2009
    Messages:
    7,792
    Location:
    Smithfield, VA
    If SpaceX can provide really cheap internet service to Tesla vehicles, then Tesla doesn't have to pay AT&T larger sums of money.

    Margins therefore increase on each car.

    Profits therefore flow to my pocket Tesla shareholders.
     
    • Like x 4
    • Funny x 4
  2. mongo

    mongo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2017
    Messages:
    12,857
    Location:
    Michigan
    I do not think there is a FCC regulation requiring fixed pricing to all for a private network system. Nor a requirement to share the mobile antenna technology needed.

    Free to owners, but not free to Tesla. Tesla is paying cellular providers for coverage and data.
     
    • Like x 2
  3. Waiting4M3

    Waiting4M3 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2016
    Messages:
    3,326
    Location:
    San Jose, California
    Other carmakers should be able to buy the same data access from SpaceX at the same price, but without building their cars to take advantage of it, for example software update, autonomous driving ghost training data, what would be their ROI on that?
     
  4. elasalle

    elasalle driVIN(188xx) it !!

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2016
    Messages:
    3,870
    Location:
    VA
    if SpaceX undercuts the telcos, the savings I will make on my internet and TV bills at home will be far greater ... that is what I am looking for.

    Also don't forget all the recent changes in Net Neutrality rules which will now allow ISP's to choose and provide preferences. This is what I am really looking for changes in. In big picture, this is what I think matters.
     
    • Like x 3
  5. GoTslaGo

    GoTslaGo Learning Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2015
    Messages:
    3,063
    Location:
    US
    All pricing will likely be negotiated. Enough competition out there, that it should be. It would only make sense that SpaceX would give preferential rates (free?) to Tesla... Anyone and everyone else should pay something. Issue would be whether Starlink would be cheaper/competitive with current incumbents.

    IIRC Audi offers internet access via TMobile (at least last I looked—several years ago). The first year was included with the car purchase, after that, you were on the hook to keep it, or you could cancel.
     
  6. ValueAnalyst

    ValueAnalyst Closed

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2016
    Messages:
    5,371
    Location:
    World
    Not sure if SpaceX can give "preferential rates" to Tesla without making the same available to others, but not sure if others have cars that can handle what Tesla's can handle either, or if other automakers would be willing.
     
    • Disagree x 2
  7. Kenypowa

    Kenypowa Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2015
    Messages:
    236
    Location:
    Calgary, AB
    Why not? SpaceX is not a publicly traded company.
     
  8. ValueAnalyst

    ValueAnalyst Closed

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2016
    Messages:
    5,371
    Location:
    World
    I think it has less to do with public/private and more with anti-competition laws. I don’t know; not an expert on this.
     
    • Helpful x 1
    • Funny x 1
  9. Lessmog

    Lessmog Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2013
    Messages:
    2,621
    Location:
    Smögen
    Maybe FCC will go the way of EPA &al ... ? There is already talk of privatising ISS. Perhaps other TLA's too? FAA? DOJ? USAF, NASA? (No, that's a 4LA)
     
  10. ggies07

    ggies07 Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2012
    Messages:
    3,772
    Location:
    Ft. Worth, TX
    hahahahaha. Tell that to the dealerships ;)
     
    • Like x 1
    • Funny x 1
  11. Reciprocity

    Reciprocity Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2017
    Messages:
    4,160
    Location:
    Chicagoland
    They dont have to, they can give preferential treatment to Vehicles over Homes or businesses for example. This is the opposite of net neutrality, which is the current law of the land with Net Neutrality dead. It was killed for this specific reason, that companies that built out networks can charge what they want and do not have to charge everyone the exact same. They can give preferential treatment to the certain traffic and charge different rates. I think if they where deemed a utility and there wasnt competition, there would be an issue. But I dont see that being in an issue in this case.
     
    • Informative x 1
  12. DragonWatch

    DragonWatch Small FootPrint

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2016
    Messages:
    1,025
    Location:
    Mother Earth (Grapeview, WA)
    Bottom line!!! Bears please list the current big auto makers willing to plung mega bucks into satellites so they can over the air update their fleet ~ even if I own my MX? Did I hear another pin drop?

    Bottom line, what auto company has entertained the idea providing their own satellite music service? Okay, maybe someone, somewhere, sometime will consider it.

    Bottom line. . . Who owns the current satellites you enjoy using for your GPS. Remember, I started using GPS back in 1983 and we needed three satellites within line of sight to function. Most taxpayer satellites are used free of charge by corporations, if I am not mistaken.

    I would switch to Tesla internet service faster than the fastest computer in existence today ~ bar none ~ amen.

    If net neutrality is no longer open and free ~ Tesla wins the game:)
     
    • Like x 1
  13. elasalle

    elasalle driVIN(188xx) it !!

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2016
    Messages:
    3,870
    Location:
    VA
    Not a bear definitely but ...

    US Population - 323 M
    US Households - 126.22 M
    Tesla owners in US -- 200K ?

    If I wanted to start a business, which of the above should I target?
     
    • Like x 1
  14. mongo

    mongo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2017
    Messages:
    12,857
    Location:
    Michigan
    Option D: Earth 7.442 billion
     
    • Like x 9
  15. ValueAnalyst

    ValueAnalyst Closed

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2016
    Messages:
    5,371
    Location:
    World
    #115 ValueAnalyst, Feb 13, 2018
    Last edited: Feb 13, 2018
    Mega bucks? Couldn’t one FH launch could possibly put a few thousand femtosatellites in space? That’s a few hundred mil afaik.
     
  16. BioSehnsucht

    BioSehnsucht Model 3 LR

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2016
    Messages:
    1,787
    Location:
    DFW, TX
    Starlink will have trouble with tunnels and crowded downtown skyscraper areas, etc, similar to satellite TV/radio/etc. Starlink also will have some limit to the number of subscribers it can handle per square mile (or whatever area metric you prefer) without bandwidth starvation (similar to terrestrial cellular networks). So if Tesla uses Starlink in the future, it is likely Tesla would still include a LTE/GSM/whatever cellular service as a backup when Starlink is unavailable and/or underperforming for a given location.

    With a clear view of the sky, and not in a crowded (in terms of Starlink subscriber) area, Starlink would provide high bandwidth, low latency (the planned LEO and VLEO constellations will in some cases have better latency than terrestrial options) coverage, and likely do so at a highly competitive rate, even without having to give Tesla special pricing.

    After all, typical cellular data service is usually some combination of limited bandwidth, limited data quota, or "unlimited" with scare quotes in which it eventually goes from fast to slow depending on your usage. But all these pricing schemes are just to extract more money from subscribers, none of the options guarantee a minimum speed (at most a maximum speed), so it would be more honest to have a flat rate. If Starlink doesn't participate in the pricing shenanigans, it could be cheaper just by being more honest.
     
    • Like x 1
  17. Reciprocity

    Reciprocity Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2017
    Messages:
    4,160
    Location:
    Chicagoland
    Option E: All of the above.
     
  18. elasalle

    elasalle driVIN(188xx) it !!

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2016
    Messages:
    3,870
    Location:
    VA
    Both answers correcto ;) I think SpaceX/EM thinking big ..
     
    • Like x 1
  19. mongo

    mongo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2017
    Messages:
    12,857
    Location:
    Michigan
    Agreeing. Depends on if they are classed as a common carrier, I think. Since they are secondary to the existing data markets, and do not need public easements (other than frequency allocation), they might not be tied to many of the regulations. Also a difference in terms of access points. If uplink station is at Fremont/ Hawthorne, not a lot others can do without a fat connection through there...

    (Regarding Option E: Is the US no longer part of Earth?)
     
    • Funny x 3
  20. mongo

    mongo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2017
    Messages:
    12,857
    Location:
    Michigan
    With 12k satellites in low/fast orbits, occlusion is less of an issue. Tunnels can be handled though per-buffering of needed data. SpaceX/ Tesla/ Boring can also add their own local repeaters similar to current satellite/ cellular systems.
     
    • Like x 3

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Formed in 2006, Tesla Motors Club (TMC) was the first independent online Tesla community. Today it remains the largest and most dynamic community of Tesla enthusiasts. Learn more.
  • Do you value your experience at TMC? Consider becoming a Supporting Member of Tesla Motors Club. As a thank you for your contribution, you'll get nearly no ads in the Community and Groups sections. Additional perks are available depending on the level of contribution. Please visit the Account Upgrades page for more details.


    SUPPORT TMC