TMC is an independent, primarily volunteer organization that relies on ad revenue to cover its operating costs. Please consider whitelisting TMC on your ad blocker and becoming a Supporting Member. For more info: Support TMC
  1. TMC is currently READ ONLY.
    Click here for more info.

SpaceX vs. Everyone - ULA, NG, Boeing, Lockheed, etc.

Discussion in 'SpaceX' started by Bgarret, Apr 25, 2014.

Tags:
  1. rabar10

    rabar10 Model 3 >> Focus Electric

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2010
    Messages:
    1,455
    Location:
    Indianapolis, IN
    For those wondering why these two Colorado representatives care about SpaceX:

    A Denver Post blog entry makes the connection.
     
  2. chickensevil

    chickensevil Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2014
    Messages:
    4,139
    Location:
    Virginia, United States
    Clearly they are slowing down the process for SpaceX in the interest of ULA... Sigh...
     
  3. Familial Rhino

    Familial Rhino Endangerous Herbivore

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2014
    Messages:
    1,555
    Location:
    Toronto, ON
  4. Grendal

    Grendal SpaceX Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2012
    Messages:
    5,661
    Location:
    Santa Fe, New Mexico
  5. kenliles

    kenliles Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2012
    Messages:
    3,060
  6. chickensevil

    chickensevil Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2014
    Messages:
    4,139
    Location:
    Virginia, United States
    We suck indeed...
    I find it interesting that they are working toward having an alternative engine that will be US made in 5 years. At the very least all of this has forced the ULA to consider a real alternative to sourcing Russian made parts and making our country reliant on these parts... which likely affects our relationship with them.
     
  7. Grendal

    Grendal SpaceX Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2012
    Messages:
    5,661
    Location:
    Santa Fe, New Mexico
    #67 Grendal, Nov 6, 2014
    Last edited: Nov 19, 2014
  8. aronth5

    aronth5 Long Time Follower

    Joined:
    May 8, 2010
    Messages:
    2,664
    Location:
    Boston Suburb
    ULA says not yet on reusable rockets

    "United Launch Alliance CEO Tory Bruno said firing engines to control a rocket's flight back to Earth, as SpaceX is now trying to do with its Falcon 9 booster, wastes fuel that could help deliver payloads to orbit.
    That's how rocket engineers see the world," he said. "That's all energy you could have used to put a bigger payload in the same orbit, or the same payload further up."

    Space Notebook: ULA says not yet on reusable rockets
    This certainly contradicts Elon Musk's contention that since the actual cost of rocket fuel used represents such a very small percentage of the rocket's stage 1 boosters total cost that paying for the fuel is insignificant in the long run when compared to the overall cost to launch. Any bets on who will turn out to be right?
     
  9. Cosmacelf

    Cosmacelf Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2013
    Messages:
    8,229
    Location:
    San Diego
    That's a pretty dumb quote from ULA. Fuel is not the expensive part, the rocket is, by far. Also, the rocket isn't coming down to earth at some screaming hypersonic speed. Air resistance slows it down to a manageable terminal velocity.

    Who knew that a rocket scientist (or rather their freaking CEO) was so dumb?
     
  10. ItsNotAboutTheMoney

    ItsNotAboutTheMoney Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2012
    Messages:
    10,212
    Location:
    Maine
    Well, it would intuitively seem that it's not rocket science, and that if you have a cheap stage, then as long as you can add more copies of that stage, you'd have more lift at low cost. But, maybe it's rocket science and it's more complicated than that.

    (Aside: Brain Surgeon - That Mitchell Webb Look , Series 3 - BBC Two - YouTube )
     
  11. Krugerrand

    Krugerrand Is Cat

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2012
    Messages:
    10,662
    Location:
    Tesla unfriendly place
    *slaps forehead*
     
  12. Johan

    Johan Ex got M3 in the divorce, waiting for EU Model Y!

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2012
    Messages:
    7,426
    Location:
    Drammen, Norway
    @ULA engineer: Or you could just use the money you saved by not crashing the rocket to refuel it... Like 100 times!
     
  13. Grendal

    Grendal SpaceX Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2012
    Messages:
    5,661
    Location:
    Santa Fe, New Mexico
    It's amazing how Elon's companies achievements gets his competitors to say idiotic things like this. We still see it all the time with Tesla and there are now over 50K cars on the road. With a genius like Tony Bruno at the head of ULA I'm sure they will keep underestimating SpaceX until it is just too late.
     
  14. aronth5

    aronth5 Long Time Follower

    Joined:
    May 8, 2010
    Messages:
    2,664
    Location:
    Boston Suburb
    #74 aronth5, Nov 16, 2014
    Last edited: Nov 16, 2014
    Imagine what people are thinking at ULA? This is my CEO! And oh by the way Tony did you ever think about this in a different way. That non-reusable rockets waste a lot more then fuel they actually waste rockets.
     
  15. Johan

    Johan Ex got M3 in the divorce, waiting for EU Model Y!

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2012
    Messages:
    7,426
    Location:
    Drammen, Norway
    Politics aside (this talk by ULA CEO is all politics) I would honestly think that most of the best talent of the ULA firms (Boeing and Lockheed Martin) in the field of spacecraft design etc. have aldreay made plans or deals with SpaceX to come work there. I would go the there future is happening, not where history is.
     
  16. TEG

    TEG Teslafanatic

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2006
    Messages:
    21,703
    Playing devils advocate a bit, I could see the quote interpreted other ways. We seem fixated on the fuel costs, but you could look at it like how much revenue you could get for being able to launch a larger satellite on the same sized rocket. Say the biggest rocket you can make is a certain size, but you want it reusable so you make it less able to carry cargo so that it can land itself. Then you are forced to launch less valuable cargo. There could be other factors, like going to a larger rocket starts limiting the launch sites that can handle it, etc. So, perhaps not as dumb as some are saying, but still there could be some "bury head in the sand" going on here.

    ostrich-head-In-Sand.jpg
     
  17. Johan

    Johan Ex got M3 in the divorce, waiting for EU Model Y!

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2012
    Messages:
    7,426
    Location:
    Drammen, Norway
    You have some very valid points. But the problem is you're looking at it at a certain point in time, where this might be true, but does really anyone not think Elon will succeed and then quickly be able to scale the tech to rocket/motor sizes where you comfortably can leave the earts gravitational field??? He talks about SpaceX as having the ultimate goal of going to Mars, you'd have to be able to leave the earths gravitational field for that right? :) So unless you believe that it will never be possible to build a reusable rocket able to go as high as it wants, there's no merit to the initial argument.
     
  18. Electroman

    Electroman Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2012
    Messages:
    6,104
    Location:
    TX
    What TEG said.

    Given that you can only carry so much of rocket fuel, the issue is what is the best use of the fuel you have on board? ULA CEO thinks it is best to use that fuel to carry heavier payloads further, than saving the first stage.
     
  19. TEG

    TEG Teslafanatic

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2006
    Messages:
    21,703
    Well, Elon seems to think bigger and bolder and wants to go beyond the status quo, so it wouldn't surprise me to see someday SpaceX building the biggest rocket ever, capable of carrying the biggest needed cargo, and also have re-usability. If it turns out to need a bigger launch pad then currently available, then they might build that too. "Giga-pad" coming soon to a space port near you. In the short term, ULA might be right, but they might not embrace the bigger long term vision.
     
  20. Arb1ter

    Arb1ter Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2014
    Messages:
    26
    Location:
    Illinois
    SpaceX already sandbags most(?) of the performance hit that would come from first-stage RTLS for engine-out capability and landing tests.
     

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Formed in 2006, Tesla Motors Club (TMC) was the first independent online Tesla community. Today it remains the largest and most dynamic community of Tesla enthusiasts. Learn more.
  • Do you value your experience at TMC? Consider becoming a Supporting Member of Tesla Motors Club. As a thank you for your contribution, you'll get nearly no ads in the Community and Groups sections. Additional perks are available depending on the level of contribution. Please visit the Account Upgrades page for more details.


    SUPPORT TMC