TMC is an independent, primarily volunteer organization that relies on ad revenue to cover its operating costs. Please consider whitelisting TMC on your ad blocker or making a Paypal contribution here: paypal.me/SupportTMC

Specuwaiting.....

Discussion in 'Model 3' started by amgibbo, Dec 23, 2015.

  1. amgibbo

    amgibbo New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2015
    Messages:
    3
    Location:
    Boston, MA
    Hey everyone, first post. While we eagerly await the arrival of the Model 3 I put some numbers together based on current options with some minor price adjustments. Obviously speculation is pretty worthless but here goes:

    I'm hesitant to give the lower kWh packs the range I did, but there should be some density improvements by 2017/18, plus there is the stated hard target of 200 real world miles.

    I also am guessing that some options on Model S will not be available purely for differentiation, such as air suspension. May be others as well.

    Fully expect Autopilot features to be available across the board to maximize fleet learning/mapping.

    Hoping for a smaller Model S in overall shape/stance, although aesthetics will be a distant relative. I don't think Tesla needs a funky shape a la Prius to sell cars. Otherwise I would opt for a CPO Model S in a couple years.

    No crazy doors, seats or pop-out door handles. I think we can agree that simplicity is key for higher production volume.

    Weight reduction will be moderate. Lighter packs and vehicle size, but use of steel over aluminum will offset a lot of overall weight loss.

    Cost at bottom is the fully loaded spec.

    Variations of range and 0-60 between packs based on current Models S deltas. No Ludicrous.


    15% lighter than 70 (4,000+lbs)455555DP60D
    Range220250260240
    0-606.254.73.5





    BASE35000450004500060000
    DUAL MOTORNANA4000INCL
    SUPERCHARGE2000INCLINCLINCL
    CONV PKG1000INCLINCLINCL
    AUTOPILOT2000200020002000
    PREMIUM PKGNA250025002500
    HIFI2000200020002000
    SUBZERO1000100010001000
    PAINT1000100010001000
    PANO1500150015001500
    18'' Wheels1000100010001000
    20'' WheelsNA250025002500
    SEATS2000200020002000
    INTERIOR TRIM1000100010001000
    AIR SUSPNANANANA





    TOTAL49500615006550076500
    Just guesses to spark discussion, don't crucify me.
     
  2. Saghost

    Saghost Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2013
    Messages:
    2,933
    Location:
    Delaware
    I think most of what you wrote makes sense. A couple little things - I don't think 220 miles from 45 kWh is likely for anyone in the next few years (and I do think the 220 is reasonably likely for a base range target, so I think the base is more likely to be a 50 or even 55 kWh car.)

    Not offering some options on the smaller battery car as options is something Tesla has never done before that I've seen - aside from the performance model special features, you've always been able to load up the cheap car with all the toys - in particular I'm looking at the premium package and 20" wheels, though I suspect there will be a dual motor small battery option, too. I'm also surprised by your suggestion of a third battery size for the performance model only - I'd expect the last three cars in your set to all share the same (60 kWh? 65 kWh?) pack.

    Agree that Autopilot will be available on all versions - possibly even standard on most, and possibly more capable than the current version is.

    It'll be interesting to see how Tesla handles Supercharging; they will undoubtedly offer it in some form. They have to be squeezing to hit the $35k target, so your speculation is a reasonable one - but I could also see them wanting to make it a non-issue as a comparison point and including it on all trims anyway.
    Walter
     
  3. coco81

    coco81 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2015
    Messages:
    72
    Location:
    Sevilla, Spain
    I think a 45/55 KWh battery is too small. If you want more than 200 real world miles of range, you need at least 220 miles EPA and considering a 20% smaller car... i think 50-55KWh it's the minimum. For a higher range version I also thinks that the minimun acceptable range will be the same of Model S85, or even more. This will be around 70KWh.
     
  4. MassModel3

    MassModel3 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2014
    Messages:
    903
    Location:
    MA South Shore
    First and foremost, welcome to the Forums!

    Geeze, I have no idea what to expect, but I think a lot of the add-ins here are a bit high. For example, the sub-zero package on the S went up from $750 to $1000 within the past year, but it shows that they can do it for $750. I think they'll have that for the 3 for no more than that cost. We can get some of the larger wheels at Tire Rack for a couple hundred bucks per wheel, so hopefully Tesla won't overcharge for them on the 3 like they do on the S. Upgrading to leather in a Camry is $1500, so in a Model 3 I expect that at the most.

    Basically, the Roadster and the S were designed to be the big money makers to fund the Model 3. The Model X I think of as a side project that they just felt like doing because they could. (What if we made the S as an SUV, gave it hospital grade filtration, gave it cool doors, etc., etc.) Then they priced it comparably to the S for like items.

    But I think the 3 will be much lower for most the options you have listed. Other in the forums post similar guesses to yours, but I think they're guessing high.
     
  5. aronth5

    aronth5 Long Time Follower

    Joined:
    May 8, 2010
    Messages:
    1,434
    Location:
    Boston Suburb
    As MassModel3 said welcome to the forum especially from another Massachusetts member!
    Wouldn't expect 4 different battery sizes. We've seen Tesla simplify options and choices for the Model S and I'd expect them to continue that approach with the 3.
    ammgibbo your low cost option is pretty pricey so what options do you believe the base model will have since Tesla needs to come under $40k?
     
  6. amgibbo

    amgibbo New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2015
    Messages:
    3
    Location:
    Boston, MA
    Thanks for the welcome! I hypothesized 3 pack sizes but it could easily be one, maybe with three motor outputs??? And certainly one pack size would make production that much easier.

    Remember the low cost option price of $49k is fully loaded. The standard $35k variant will be pretty bone dry I suspect. Can economy of scale from a pack standpoint really bring the price down that much and still have standard features akin to the Model S? I hope so but...

    I'm now starting to lean towards fewer battery sizes as you and Saghost suggest.

    Ideally I would like dual motor, 4sec or better 0-60, AP and premium interior for target price of $60k. Feasible? And it can't look like an i3 or Bolt.

    Really the least of my worries though. I live in the city with on-street parking only and no access to home charging.
     
  7. amgibbo

    amgibbo New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2015
    Messages:
    3
    Location:
    Boston, MA
    Thanks for the welcome! I adjusted options prices a bit and now have four 60 kWh variants in place of pack sizes. Quoted ranges get tricky when using same proportions for current Model S packs. Obviously won't be the same.

    We're getting closer!?

    15% lighter (4,000lbs)6060DP60P60D
    Range230240220225
    0-605.55.243.7
    BASE35000400005000060000
    DUAL MOTORNAINCLNAINCL
    SPC2000INCLINCLINCL
    CONV PKG1000INCLINCLINCL
    AUTOPILOT1500150015001500
    PREMIUM PKGNA200020002000
    HIFI1500150015001500
    SUBZERO500500500500
    PAINT1000100010001000
    PANO1500150015001500
    18'' Wheels500500500500
    20'' WheelsNA100010001000
    SEATS1500150015001500
    INTERIOR TRIM1000100010001000
    AIR SUSPNANANANA
    TOTAL47000520006200072000
     
  8. pmadflyer

    pmadflyer Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2015
    Messages:
    347
    Location:
    Shawnee, KS
    Just remember that Tesla will have enough automobile cells for every car to have 70 kWh. It wouldn't surprise me if we get something very similar to angibbo's table, but with options for the larger wheels and interior package on all models.
     
  9. coco81

    coco81 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2015
    Messages:
    72
    Location:
    Sevilla, Spain
    They have to offer two battery pack size. I will never buy the car if the range is lower than an actual S85.I bet 55, 55D, 70, 70D, P70D.
     
  10. Colsla

    Colsla Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2015
    Messages:
    156
    Location:
    Vancouver, BC, Canada
    I highly doubt that 10 kwh increase in battery will translate to 10k extra. even 70 to 85 is just over 12k (in Canada anyways). This without the GF too.
     
  11. MassModel3

    MassModel3 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2014
    Messages:
    903
    Location:
    MA South Shore
    Just to pull an old article out for battery cost comparisons:

    “I think most of the targets that we see from the likes of DoE or EIA are very much on the conservative side. And, you can sort of do the math on what a battery would have to cost, you know, for a vehicle that can travel 200 – 250 miles and still cost $35,000,” said Straubel, “but I think we would be disappointed if battery costs were not in the $100 dollar range [per kilowatt-hour] by the end of this decade, somewhere in this ballpark.”

    With these costs, we're only talking about another $1,000 productions cost for another 10KWh. Even if you figure the GF starts out with $150 per KWh, then we double it to make it a highly profitable product for Tesla, that's still only $3,000 for a 10 KWh increase.

    But since the goal is to sell cars, not make a profit on the batteries (that's what PowerWall is for), I think no more than maybe $180 dollars per KWh by the time the Model 3 starts production. This puts a 50KWh battery cost at $9K, and another 15KWh for less than $3K.

    And Elon Musk recently said that right now, if people don't have an urgent need to upgrade to a larger battery, then wait. This tells me that when the GF starts up next summer, prices will drop considerably. The cost of batteries will no longer be the reason pure EV's aren't mass market.
     
  12. ryanjm

    ryanjm Tesla Podcast Host

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2009
    Messages:
    376
    Location:
    San Francisco, CA
    Some fun speculative food for thought here, but I don't see any way the biggest battery option on Model 3 only gets 240 miles to a charge. It wouldn't be much of an upgrade over the base battery, and as someone hoping to buy a fully-optioned Model 3, I'd be very disappointed by that. I suspect 275-300 EPA miles from the big battery.
     
  13. igotzzoom

    igotzzoom Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2013
    Messages:
    838
    Location:
    Laguna Hills, CA
    I have always said I'd be perfectly content with a 0-60 acceleration time of 6 flat for the base model. That's plenty quick for real-world, everyday driving.
     
  14. Zwalderon

    Zwalderon Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2015
    Messages:
    27
    Location:
    Hillsboro, OR
    5 seconds for me
     
  15. coco81

    coco81 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2015
    Messages:
    72
    Location:
    Sevilla, Spain
    I know you have cheap fuel and powerful cars in America, but here in Europe the base Model 3 equivalent is a 1.8/2.0 four cilinder diesel with less than 200hp... 0-60 in these cars is about 8-10 seconds. If the base model 3 can do 0-60 in 6 seconds it will be absolutely great here. Vast majority of cars are much slower.

    I'm not sure if I will pay 4-5k $ more for a sub-5 seconds dual drive version considering this, for me 0-100Km/h (60mph aprox) in less than 6 seconds is a really really fast car.
     
  16. Yggdrasill

    Yggdrasill Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2012
    Messages:
    2,531
    Location:
    Kongsberg, Norway
    #16 Yggdrasill, Dec 30, 2015
    Last edited: Dec 30, 2015
    You're not the first to try to figure out how the pricing will be. :wink:

    Here's my estimates from a different thread, but I've changed them according to an assumed Cd of 0.199 and some other adjustments.

























































































































    Version 55 55D 70 70D P70D
    Range 220 230 280 290 270
    Horsepower 200 300* 200 400 500*
    0-60 6.0 4.8 6.5 4.0 2.8
    Base 34,900 38,900 40,900 44,900 56,900
    Supercharge 1,500** 1,500** INCL INCL INCL
    Tech Pack 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000
    Autopilot 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000
    Leather Seats 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000
    Premium Interior 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250
    Interior trim 500 500 500 500 500
    Sound Studio 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500
    Metallic Paint 750 750 750 750 750
    Winter Pack 750 750 750 750 750
    18" Wheels 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000
    20" Wheels 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500
    TOP SPEC: 48,650 52,650 53,150 57,150 69,150
    * Battery Limited
    ** One year access included for free, costs 2,000 after delivery
     
  17. wallet.dat

    wallet.dat Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2013
    Messages:
    443
    Location:
    SW
    I live less than 1 mile from the freeway, and work less than 100 yards from the same freeway, so 0-60 times are irrelevant to me. I'm just hoping the top end AWD model has at-speed acceleration that's better than, say, a Focus ST.
     
  18. mwulff

    mwulff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2015
    Messages:
    348
    Location:
    Danmark
    Acceleration comes from the from a combination of pack voltage and how many amps you can draw from the pack. At the moment tesla uses around 400 volts on their current pack design. If memory serves there are 16 modules in series in the pack with each having 6 groups of cells.

    Now when they reduce the pack size they will have to choose between voltage or capacity. They only have room for so many cells inside the car. I believe they will lower the voltage a bit to get more capacity.

    If you redid the model s pack to let's say 296V you could cram more kWh into the pack by adding more parallel cells to each module. But your max output would be lower.

    I think they will go for a lower voltage and as much capacity as they can cram into the smaller car-frame.
     
  19. coco81

    coco81 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2015
    Messages:
    72
    Location:
    Sevilla, Spain
    I think model 3 will have (more or less) the same battery pack voltage than model S for supercharger compability. And I also think that the smaller battery version (basic 35000$ or dual drive ¿40000$?) will have similar performance due to the maximum output power available from the battery (remember model S 40KWh performances). The bigger battery model 3 (¿70KWh?) will be much faster than the basic model 3 (both single or dual drive versions).
     
  20. Yggdrasill

    Yggdrasill Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2012
    Messages:
    2,531
    Location:
    Kongsberg, Norway
    You've misunderstood how it works. The number of given cells dictates the capacity, regardless of how they are configured. Cells in parallel have their Ah added together, while cells in series adds the voltage together.

    Say you have 10,000 cells with 4V and 2.5 Ah. You can configure them in one long series, giving you a pack with 40 kV and 2.5 Ah. Or a capacity of 2.5 Ah * 40 kV = 100 kWh. Or you can wire all the cells in parallell, giving you a pack with 4 V and 25 kAh. Or a capacity of 4V * 25 kAh = 100 kWh.

    The voltage is selected not because the capacity or power is different, but because some voltages are easier to work with. Lower voltage is better because it's less dangerous and you need less insulation on the wires, higher voltage is better because the resistive losses will be less, and you need less copper to conduct a given power. 400-ish Volts is a good compromise.

    I would expect the Model 3 to have a voltage similar to the Model S.
     

Share This Page