You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I haven't read every single post here, but the speed limit thing is only vaguely useful IMO... I think it may be more useful to Tesla as test data for driverless cars. They will essentially have a fleet of cars out testing how well their software reads signs and the environment, as the camera probably does more than just look at signs and the lane markers. Heck, it can even be used for adaptive cruise if they decide to use cameras instead of radar (Wasn't that part of a disagreement between Tesla and Google?)
New to the forum, thought I'd share my ideas below.
I'm not sure when they're planning to release the ACC, but having the speed assist first could be their first part of the rollout. They probably want to make sure the reading of speed limits is robust enough before making it work with ACC (as in set cruise speed automatically maybe?). They could also be running a beta version of ACC in the background and record / report it's accuracy of what the system would have done compared to the driver's actual behaviour. With that data they can see what tweaks to do before enabling the ACC to people with Driver Assist package.
Well, just adding folding mirrors is $2700.00, so it depends on what you consider "reasonable". I don't consider $2700.00 for two mirrors "reasonable" (unless they're made of gold I guess)
Does your wife's 2014 Volvo also have forward collision warning?
Good point. That would make it more expensive. I'm sure people have had to get windshields replaced due to rock damage. Anyone know the price of a new windshield?
About $1,400.
The text from brianman says there is a haptic response from the steering wheel when the car drifts out of lane. There will be some sort of retrofit for that, if not a completely new steering wheel.
BMW utilizes the same feedback for lane departure - vibrating steering wheel.
I did the parking sensor upgrade (VIN 8950) without replacing the bumper. While Tesla say it is, that's nonsense. Any experienced shop can drill the required holes in the bumpers. My total cost was about $2,400.
Where do you drive, Afghanistan? Over here (EU) we consider state of our roads as pretty bad and still I know only 2 people who had to have their windshield replaced due to rock damage.
This is another example of the problems that come from not having a real NAV system. All of my Garmin systems have real time speed limit indication on the maps, thing next to the actual speed readout, provided by the internal database. No camera and no internet connection required. This development worries me, as an indication that NAV functionality will never include an POI or other database. That's a big issue for someone living where there is no cell service. And it is a huge kluge work-around, with a stupid hardware kluge and added cost, and no availability for older cars. Every NAV database knows road speed limits. Without that, TM is reduced to interpreting, interpolating, and downloading, with tons of warnings and caveats thrown in. It simply isn't as good as a hard wired NAV database. Given the added cost and inability to retrofit, it seems to be a death knell indication for those of us expecting a software solution to speed limit awareness, and the end of any possibility that we will ever be able to get categorized POIs or simply ask "Where's the nearest police station, post office or library?"
Just to clarify, it wouldn't require a data connection to read and interpret a speed limit sign, and I would rather that than going off a database. Maybe your roads in your area doesn't change that often, but my Navigon maps in the MS are so outdated that there are whole swaths of road that are just plain missing, and I would be afraid at the number of times the speed limits have been changed around here. Sure, for 90% of the roads, a database would probably work fine, but what about that other 10%? You willing to risk it?
"Do you know how fast you were going?"
"Yes, 55, that is the speed limit"
"Uh no, sir, the speed limit is 45"
"But my car database told me 55!"
It is virtually the same risk using both systems... And at least if the Mobileye system can't read the speed limit sign you *might* be able to claim that *you* couldn't read the sign. Which has been known to work, if the sign is partially covered or blocked or whatever by... well... anything, really, you can generally argue that the sign was unreadable and therefore you went the speed you assumed the road would be posted at.
But, to be clear, mobileye does not need an internet connection to work for any of its features. I don't see why this would be any different since it is virtually the same technology.
Yes, Tesla will sell the parts for the parking assist if you give them the part numbers. They will also update the car's firmware to recognize the new hardware. They charged $150 to do that (1 hour labor charge).
1) Check the windshield for cutouts around the mirror (parts where the black paint is missing). You could probably just take a picture and we can compare to our cars
2) Take off the microphone grill (don't worry, it's easy and pops right back on) to see if there's a loose connector in there.
We don't know exactly where the camera will be mounted, so 1) probably won't tell us anything definitively unless you have a new camera-size cutout with no camera. They could put it on the mirror mount itself, in which case old windshields might be fine. No way to know yet.
artsci
Did you get the Tesla or aftermarket sensors as I have been researching this retro fit and am caught between an LED monitor
or two thin bar graphs (one on the front dash one on the rear widow if I go aftermarket cost around $1500.
Now reading your post.... just an idea if I go to a shop and have them pre drill the holes would Tesla install the OEM as the big expense has been replacing the bumpers?
Sorry if this distracts from the org OP subject
This is another example of the problems that come from not having a real NAV system. All of my Garmin systems have real time speed limit indication on the maps, thing next to the actual speed readout, provided by the internal database. No camera and no internet connection required. This development worries me, as an indication that NAV functionality will never include an POI or other database. That's a big issue for someone living where there is no cell service. And it is a huge kluge work-around, with a stupid hardware kluge and added cost, and no availability for older cars. Every NAV database knows road speed limits. Without that, TM is reduced to interpreting, interpolating, and downloading, with tons of warnings and caveats thrown in. It simply isn't as good as a hard wired NAV database. Given the added cost and inability to retrofit, it seems to be a death knell indication for those of us expecting a software solution to speed limit awareness, and the end of any possibility that we will ever be able to get categorized POIs or simply ask "Where's the nearest police station, post office or library?"