ElectricEel
Member
INTERESTING!ODD: Let's see if i math correctly. From 95% to 5% I used 36kWH. but 90% of 50 is Is 45kwh...where the eff did my other 9kWh go? Picture of proof:
I hate to say this but I think the SR battery is only 40kWh....
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
SR owners only (NOT SR+) What is your max range at 100% SOC?
- Thread starter Cmunny
- Start date
INTERESTING!ODD: Let's see if i math correctly. From 95% to 5% I used 36kWH. but 90% of 50 is Is 45kwh...where the eff did my other 9kWh go? Picture of proof:
I hate to say this but I think the SR battery is only 40kWh....
super20g
Member
I found the jack points all torn from improper transport or something prior to delivery. Only way to fix is to replace the battery.
the consumption totals only count driving energy use. The heat, AC, radio, lights, etc don’t impact the consumption calculation.
If that is the case and depending on temp, the HVAC can easily consume the remaining 9kw. To me though it is not very useful to only measure driving consumption.... Total consumption is much more useable and what I thought the system was measuring.
ElectricEel
Member
If that's the case then, yea makes complete sense, the A/C can eat up 2kWh and if I drove for 5 hours that day, that's around 10kW just there. And that would explain the loss. I'll do another comparison in the winter because I won't be using the heat or ac at all.
I agree. I wish it showed all consumption. Breaking it down by energy by use time would be awesome but Tesla would be even more inundated with questions about variations lol
AlanSubie4Life
Efficiency Obsessed Member
It shows all consumption, when the car is not in park. If the car is in park it does not count energy use. Which can be significant! But absolutely, the trip meter takes into account HVAC usage - when you are driving!
It went to the heater, cooling and the rest of the cars systems
ElectricEel
Member
Yeap I figured that already. I always have mine on. Even at 2-3kWh in 5 hrs of driving, it's 10-15kwh consumed. Makes sense, I just really really wish the system calculated that into a single system like how the Chevy Volt does it, in my bolt it shows live kWh usage.
I saw my range plummet overnight when I did my SR+ to SR downgrade. After 15k miles, I was still getting 239 miles at 100%, and it went down to 208 the day I got the downgrade. I’ve highlighted the date of the downgrade and the date of the previous OTA upgrade per TeslaFi.
A month later, I’m showing 207 at 100%, and lucky if I get 200 miles, even with a lifetime average of 221Wh/mi (which is often under 200).
A month later, I’m showing 207 at 100%, and lucky if I get 200 miles, even with a lifetime average of 221Wh/mi (which is often under 200).
I was really hoping an OTA update would resolve this -- after 15k miles of no range loss (my SR+ charged to 238-239 until the day I downgraded to SR 15,000 miles in, at which point I got 208 at 100%), my range loss continues to increase. I'm down to 198 miles at 100%.
Blucenturion
Member
Celledral
Member
Had SR, upgrade to + and the most I saw was 228-230. Now I’m at 209-215 with 12k miles in 6months. That’s either some heavy degradation or some bad battery calculation.
AdamMacDon
Member
I didn't vote as I have the SR+, but I get 360km of rated range, which is about 223 miles. I've had the car for about 6 months, so I've seen a bit of degradation for sure.
AdamMacDon
Member
I dunno, it could be temporary because of the cold, but here in BC it's usually around 5-10 degrees, we don't get real winters in my city, so I think the ~5% loss might just be normal degradation.
Similar threads
