Thats what makes it unconstitutional.
Which clause of the Constitution are you referencing here?
Thank you kindly.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thats what makes it unconstitutional.
Haha what? Drunk drivers mow down 2000 pedestrians per year, which is 50% of all pedestrian deaths. I'd call that an epidemic!There isn't an epidemic of people being mowed down by drunk drivers either. Should we ignore that too? While you're at it why not take out all the lights in your car and drive wearing a night vision scope. Then you will be invisible too!
That's not true however, since an "ICE" noise level can vary significantly. For example, a Rolls Royce would have a completely different noise profile than a Corolla. Most premium class vehicles (which outnumber hybrids and EVs by a large margin) now have extensive sound insulation in the engine bay, with significantly lower noise levels. The law should set a dB minimum that applies to all passenger vehicles or it's simply unfairly targeting a class of vehicles (hybrids and EVs).Sorry, I'm trying to use common sense here. You don't need to regulate the noise level an ICE makes near pedestrians, because they make sufficient noise to allow for visually impaired people to be aware of their presence.
they're saying you need to produce noise. they're not saying you can't drive it at all.That's not true however, since an "ICE" noise level can vary significantly. For example, a Rolls Royce would have a completely different noise profile than a Corolla. Most premium class vehicles (which outnumber hybrids and EVs by a large margin) now have extensive sound insulation in the engine bay, with significantly lower noise levels. The law should set a dB minimum that applies to all passenger vehicles or it's simply unfairly targeting a class of vehicles (hybrids and EVs).
I'm simply pointing out this law is unfair to hybrids and EVs because they don't apply to other vehicles (particularly ICE vehicles are completely excluded) that may be as quiet if not more quiet. A fair law would apply to all passenger vehicles based on the minimum dB necessary for a pedestrian to hear the vehicle under some standard (this assumption may be specious in the first place based on background noise levels; personally I feel there are lots of problems with the studies used to support this law, but that's a discussion for another time).they're saying you need to produce noise. they're not saying you can't drive it at all.
please stop using phrases like "targeting", you make it sound as if you're being persecuted. It's a simple technological fix that makes complete sense for the safety of all involved.
next you'll tell me that drunk driving laws unfairly target those who like to get plowed and then go plowing through pedestrians.
> In this case, it's legislating/regulating a particular product that behaves a certain way. [ModelNforNerd]
No, since other categories of vehicle behave in the same manner (the very large population of quiet ICEs). Thats what makes it unconstitutional. And legal laws are the only ones found unconstitutional, btw. Being constitutional is so *inconvenient*; it is more politically effective to pick an unpopular group and aim the legislation directly against them.
Example of a constitutional law would be the 85db noise law which is often posted on signs upon entering a village or special district. It is fact based and applies either to all vehicles or else only to the type specified (or pictured) on the sign e.g. dirt bikes.
--
There is more to the constitution than discrimination.Since driving an EV is not a protected activity and drivers of EVs are not a protected class, I wouldn't expect a US court to find the law unconstitutional.
There is more to the constitution than discrimination.
Why harp about the constitution ? Equitable treatment sounds good to me.What clause or amendment would you cite to find it unconstitutional ?
Why harp about the constitution ? Equitable treatment sounds good to me.
Or not.but a BEV is inherently quieter.
Or not.
I really do not understand your position that a quiet ICE is OK for blind people but a quiet EV is not.
I am not. My Prius has a noise generator that does not bother me in the least.If you're complaining that the government is going to require your car to make noise
Honestly I just watched a bunch of videos and while the sound is neat, it's kind of annoying. It's louder than all the other cars driving around it, and it's not a soft "putt putt putt", but rather an abrasive, grating noise. Maybe it's just the pitch or the camera mics aren't doing it justice, but I would hope Tesla comes up with a better noise than that.See post #32
music to one's ears
winner winner
Honestly I just watched a bunch of videos and while the sound is neat, it's kind of annoying. It's louder than all the other cars driving around it, and it's not a soft "putt putt putt", but rather an abrasive, grating noise. Maybe it's just the pitch or the camera mics aren't doing it justice, but I would hope Tesla comes up with a better noise than that.