Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Strangling Innovation: Tesla versus “Rent Seekers”

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
Recently, the New York and North Carolina legislatures considered a new law written by Auto Dealer lobbyists that would make it illegal for Tesla to sell cars directly to consumers. This got me thinking about the legal obstacles that face innovators with new business models.


Examples of startups challenging the status quo include: Lyft, Square, Uber, Airbnb, SpaceX, Zillow, Bitcoin, LegalZoom, food trucks, charter schools, and massively open online courses. Past examples of startups that succeeded in redefining current industries include Craigslist, Netflix, Amazon, Ebay and Paypal.


While Tesla, Lyft, Uber, Airbnb, et al are in very different industries, they have two things in common: 1) they’re disruptive business models creating new markets and upsetting the status quo and 2) the legal obstacles confronting them weren’t from direct competitors, but from groups commonly referred to as “rent seekers.”

The rest of why this happens and how new companies like Tesla can fight back is here: Strangling Innovation: Tesla versus | Steve Blank
 
thanks. I thought so too.
But it's more than likely the wrong forum for anything more complicated than complaints about 5mile/day vampire losses and Tesla grins.

Here's hoping there are people dealing with these issues strategically inside Tesla.