That will do nothing, since those bug reports do not go anywhere at all, they stay local to the car. They are only used for troubleshooting for a SC / other service personnel if you take your car for service and say "XXX happened and I did a bug report"
It basically puts a marker in the cars internal log file. Telling people to submit a bug report for a feature is misguided, since it doesnt go anywhere.
I also personally dont think any manufacturer has any duty at all to make it "easier" to use aftermarket parts, so Tesla's duty in this is to do everything they can to extend the life of the parts they chose as OEM ones. They have no duty to make it easier to use aftermarket electrical parts.
The only service calls it would eliminate would be from people who have aftermarket batteries, and people with aftermarket batteries are not covered by warranty for that, so I doubt it changes their actually service calls much.
They dont have any duty to make it easier to use an Ohmmu (or any other 3rd party battery).
Not to mention adding such a feature creates more headaches for Tesla, not less.
It tacitly endorses non-OEM technology that they have had no involvement in testing or qualifying being fitted to their cars. Someone buys a car with a third-party battery installed, or fits it themselves, notes that Tesla "support" it via the UI allowing you to choose it, and quite legitimately go to Tesla when something goes wrong. "Why does Tesla let you choose what battery type you've got then?", etc.
It is also a waste of development time & effort supporting non-OEM equipment. Tesla don't benefit financially from it, so they have nothing to gain and - as noted above - more to lose just in officially accommodating it in support query headaches, etc.
The only way things like Ohmmu can work, replacing something that is part of a managed system (unlike something "dumb" like, say, aftermarket alloy wheels) is if that system doesn't "know" it's there. As soon as the car suspects something is wrong with the auxiliary battery, because it's responding in an unexpected way, then the car has no other choice but to assume the lead-acid battery it thinks is there is faulty and flag warnings appropriately.
The fact this has happened several times with Ohmmu batteries isn't - I think - malice on Tesla's part, rather that the auxiliary battery maintenance system is opaque, not trivial and subject to change at any point in much the same way as Tesla tweaks efuse blow limits and VCLeft/VCRight behaviour without warning or agreement.
Ohmmu batteries no doubt work great but you are introducing something to a managed system that does have the very real potential of being "outed" by the car at any given moment, after any update, probably when you least expect or are prepared for it.