I've got 4 days left to my trial and so far I've had this false positive occur a good dozen times. I've seen 3 scenarios trigger this:
1) A truck passes me in the left lane and when the truck moves back to the right lane in front of me, unless there is a LONG distance spread, I get a brake jerk. That is unsettling at a minimum, and though I haven't had any cars following me closely while that happenned, if it had been the case I could have been rear-ended that way.
2) A vehicle joins the highway from the right ahead of me but with a tight distance, albeit at the right speed, my car slams the brakes and prays no one's following.
3) This morning, clear highway ahead of me, but being followed closely behind by a truck again, and the adaptive cruise (after 3 sudden brake episodes from situation 1 I was pretty annoyed and had stopped using EAP) pulled a brake check on the truck following behind.
Tesla, if you're reading this, please do not hesitate to pull the logs from my car and review this.
I'm not happy at all with this trial. I'm ending it early. As far as I'm concerned, EAP in its current state is annoying and the brake checking / sudden braking can be dangerous in some situations and could even get me in trouble with the law as in my province it is considered a detrimental maneuver endangering other road users and can be heftily fined. Trust me folks, I know this the hard way from a past lifed.
My conclusion to this trial: I have no doubt EAP as a whole may be safer than many drivers out there. As far as I'm concerned (professional driver speaking) it is a useless and annoying driving assist / tool. Tesla has much, MUCH more development work ahead to make this EAP, nevermind FSD truly a useful and safer tool for professional driving.
Here's what I believe Tesla needs to prioritize in development of EAP/FSD:
* Putting an end to those false positives should already have been sorted out.
* Better tolerance for temporary safe distance infringement (as in getting cut off from someone closing a pass early and not actually slamming the brakes).
* Improving speed limit panel recognition (EAP limiting speed to 60kph in a 90kph zone is not cool).
* Implementing pothole/pavement damage avoidance.
* Apex trajectories in curves to avoid crossing vehicles to closely.
* Allow variable centering to keep vehicle outside carved pavement (ruts) especially in rainy conditions, but also for smoother ride.
* Smoother maneuvers in general.
In my opinion, this should be done even before on-off ramp would be implemented, because you know what, on-off ramps and auto lanec change are going to be game-changers for many people who might then get frustrated by the apparent lack of intelligence and/or borderline dangerousness of some maneuvers such as sudden braking and lack of apex trajectories in curves allowing the car to cross incoming traffic dangerously close or at least too close for comfort.
/rant