Yeah, because defacing private property is such a good, and legal, thing to do.
I’m sure if Tesla gave back the capacity they stole the posters would disappear overnight
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
Wiki Sudden Loss Of Range With 2019.16.x Software
- Thread starter Dutchmeeuw
- Start date
I’m sure if Tesla gave back the capacity they stole the posters would disappear overnight
Daniel in SD
(supervised)
Looks like a model 3 owner tried to tear off the sticker but was too distracted by the koolaid to finish.
But stealing battery capacity from individuals is ok? Seams like an opposite of Robinhood idea.Yeah, because defacing private property is such a good, and legal, thing to do.
That sticker has been there for more than a month, so I think it's holding up fairly well
frankly I could not give a crap about pRiVaTE prOpErTy. Get some letter sized sticker paper from amazon and go to town:
Attachments
I fully agree but as I said I remember some kind of pumping. Means, after reaching 4.200 in one cell you switch off and wait for some balancing and then you can do the next trial to get closer to 4.200V on all cells and not only on one. I mean like stage4 in figure1 of this article https://batteryuniversity.com/learn/article/charging_lithium_ion_batteries
Had some weird SuC activity yesterday. Drove 15’ P85D from michigan to Georgia. And it took 17 hours. This is the last charge
2020.8.1
Switched SuC and it ramped down from 90kw. So ready for this battery to fail. Arrived with 1 mike range.
Switched SuC and it ramped down from 90kw. So ready for this battery to fail. Arrived with 1 mike range.
Daniel in SD
(supervised)
I don’t know the specific way Tesla does it (though my understanding is that they use off the shelf chips so you can look at the data sheet). There is no need to stop charging when one cell hits 4.2v, you can have a circuit to shunt current around the cell that is full or on more advanced designs you can shunt current from the cell with the highest SoC to the one with the lowest SoC (this is more efficient but more complicated).
Shortly on the news, 'Amazon in now out of toilet paper, bleach and letter sized sticker paper.'
Wouldn't a possible replacement strategy be that non P models gets the - assumed - 350V pack and P models the refurbed 400V packs? For the same power at 350V as at 400V, the current draw is 15% higher, which could be above what wiring supports.
Depends on local rules. Here in Denmark, a part replaced under warranty receives a new warranty with period equal to the original warranty period, but with a 3 year limit due to another Danish law regarding expirations. So here your replaced part will have a new 3 year warranty.
Last edited:
Does it really work that way? The warranty is on the car, not the part, so if the car is repaired, even by replacing a part, wouldn't it keep the original warranty period? (However, if the car is replaced you would get a new warranty period.)
Nope, this is very clear because of cases in 2016-2018 where the 'ombudsmand' had to pull back and acknowledge the 3 year 'to old claim' limitation..At my cars 4 years warranty expires check, my local SC told me that my MCU (replaced under warranty at age 2,3 years) has warranty untill 6.3 years.
I'm pleased with that!
MeToo!
My S 70D October 2015 is A-okay, only unwanted 'degradation' is the 10-15% slower Super Charging.
As an Electronics Engineer, I always wondered how Tesla could expect that boosted charging up to 1.5C would NOT effect longevity and degradation of their super high capacity cells. I would rather SUC at a maximum of 90kW and retain capacity and ability, than super charge with 120kW and degrade my battery in no time.
If Tesla had set the expectations right and informed that super charging is not for free degradation wise . . . . . .
Same stats for my car: S70, 2015, no degradation, about 20% slower supercharging.
In case anyone from Tesla is listening in, I'd love a "Turbo charge" option for supercharging that lets me charge at a higher rate on some occasions. For example, let's say I'm in Mobile Alabama late at night and I'm tired and just want to move on and NOT spend extra time in a dark deserted scary parking lot tethered to charger that won't allow me to put the car in drive. Let me get moving along at the expense of more rapid degradation just this one time. You can put a counter on the amount I've charged at high rates. Play an annoying alert while charging at higher rates... anything. Just give me my speed back when I NEED it.
I wish it was only reduced to 90kw. I haven’t seen anything above 70-80kw recently. At 25% SoC the car is barely doing 55kW on an empty supercharger.
I remember people asking for the ability to slow down supercharging years ago. If faster rates are damaging batteries and/or causing fires, Tesla should have listened to them instead of just removing the option and planning to take away faster rates from everyone else in a few years. If a "Turbo" button had Ludicrous' "I want my mommy" message alerting of increased battery wear, across the board downgrades probably wouldn't have happened. I mean, look at how many apologists are still trying to say the slowed speeds and shrunk batteries are great for them... they wouldn't have ever used faster charging or range or the turbo button.
Similar threads
